You said "sexy dancing". That's a very broad category. I can't think of many types of dancing (apart from the hand jive maybe) which don't include some form of "sexiness". Well played with taking kids to lap dancing clubs, mindAll sexy dancing? Should dads be taking two year olds to lap dancing clubs? Or is there a line somewhere between appropriate and inappropriate behaviour, and we are disagreeing about exactly where that line should be?
Not sure I can think of anyone who has opted to take their infant to a baby rave with semi-clad dancers rather than, say, soft play tbh. But each to their own.
Half of London parents at a vague guessNot sure I can think of anyone who has opted to take their infant to a baby rave with semi-clad dancers rather than, say, soft play tbh. But each to their own.
Would anyone like to venture the opinion that sexy dancing is something that positively should be done in front of babies, and then I can have a turn at the whataboutery?
I have, and I haven't ever needed to take a baby/child to an event involving nipple tassles and thongs I mean, you can just go to actual baby sensory sessions where everyone is dressed.How? By preventing parents from attending any event where sexy dancing may take place?
Have you ever been a main carer for a baby?
But this was an event aimed at parents, not babies, at which some very mild burlesque appears to have been a small part. It was billed as a cabaret/rave, not a sexy dancing show. I agree it looks a bit naff and middle class and I doubt it's something I'd have gone to but I support the principle of events for parents of babies to enjoy which aren't cringy infantilised sing alongs or other nonsense (which also are usually just as middle class).I have, and I haven't ever needed to take a baby/child to an event involving nipple tassles and thongs I mean, you can just go to actual baby sensory sessions where everyone is dressed.
Sadly, they'll only find it again and continue throwing it at the rest of usMumsnet is losing its shit over this
I'm not really sure what the distinction is between 'aimed at parents' and 'aimed at babies' or whether it matters. It seems to me to be aimed at parents bringing their under 5s with them, with performers interacting with children and there being explicitly 'baby sensory' elements of the show.But this was an event aimed at parents, not babies, at which some very mild burlesque appears to have been a small part. It was billed as a cabaret/rave, not a sexy dancing show. I agree it looks a bit naff and middle class and I doubt it's something I'd have gone to but I support the principle of events for parents of babies to enjoy which aren't cringy infantilised sing alongs or other nonsense (which also are usually just as middle class).
As the event organisers said, there's only so many times you can listen to wheels on a fucking bus.
I think there's a note to be drawn on this - the moniker "Terf" is largely out of date at this point but it doesn't come from nowhere. A fair number of very active leftists were involved in the build-up to the current mess. They often declare themselves "politically homeless" these days precisely because 90% of their politics are left, with a side of single-issue bigotry. There's lots of people who have similar issues around their political positions, including with anti-Semitism, racism, sexism etc, and we probably need a conversation to happen which isn't either "I'm a bigot and left, accept me or I'll whine about cancel culture forever" or "no true leftist."And the ones on here pretend to be left wing as well.
I'm not really sure what the distinction is between 'aimed at parents' and 'aimed at babies' or whether it matters. It seems to me to be aimed at parents bringing their under 5s with them, with performers interacting with children and there being explicitly 'baby sensory' elements of the show.
Yeah sure, it's the putting men in thongs in there that makes it weird.But isn't that a good thing? Way back when I was involved with parties and festivals we used to actively push for a kids/family space so that parents, who were usually women, could be included. We didn't expect them to stay in those spaces though, the intention was that there'd be something for adults to enjoy and something for kids.
There's lots of people who have similar issues around their political positions, including with anti-Semitism, racism, sexism etc,
Not a main carer though. But a carer non the less.Have you ever been a main carer for a baby? I know loads of people, myself included, who've taken babies to festivals where there might be sexy dancing, foul language, suggestive attire and all manners of lewdness. As the event organisers said, there's only so many times you can listen to wheels on a fucking bus.
we probably need a conversation to happen which isn't either "I'm a bigot and left, accept me or I'll whine about cancel culture forever" or "no true leftist."
Which is fine on an individual level, especially for people who have to live with it being aimed at them, but fact is these people won't sort out their shitty opinions if they're permanently corralled into internet silos filled with other bigots. Imo as a movement we've repeatedly made errors by thinking we can aggressively exclude our way out of this. There's plenty of hopeless cases of course, but I can also personally think of several people I know who maybe could have gone the other way if the choices hadn't been "people calling me a scumbag for voicing my fears" and "people calling me a hero for asking the important questions."And until those people sort out their shitty opinions I've got no time for them either.
Which is fine on an individual level, especially for people who have to live with it being aimed at them, but fact is these people won't sort out their shitty opinions if they're permanently corralled into internet silos filled with other bigots. Imo as a movement we've repeatedly made errors by thinking we can aggressively exclude our way out of this - I can personally think of several people I know who maybe could have gone the other way if the choices hadn't been "people calling me a scumbag for voicing my fears" and "people calling me a hero for asking the important questions."
Wtf at anyone thinking this is appropriate for children of any age.
And if you think it’s just the far right who have a problem with sexualised drag queen performances for children you’re deluded.
And I’d be very wary of letting young adolescents in my care be exposed to lap dancing, drag shows, burlesque or any other name you want to give the objectification of women. And I say that as someone who as an adolescent was involved in that world.
Adults- do what you like to get your kicks, I know I have my kinks But you won’t find me supporting the exposure of children to sexual material. Hard no from me. And I give no shits if that makes me a pearl clutching prude in your eyes.
Wtf at anyone thinking this is appropriate for children of any age.
And if you think it’s just the far right who have a problem with sexualised drag queen performances for children you’re deluded.
And I’d be very wary of letting young adolescents in my care be exposed to lap dancing, drag shows, burlesque or any other name you want to give the objectification of women. And I say that as someone who as an adolescent was involved in that world.
Adults- do what you like to get your kicks, I know I have my kinks But you won’t find me supporting the exposure of children to sexual material. Hard no from me. And I give no shits if that makes me a pearl clutching prude in your eyes.
But people tend to exclude themselves from groups when they discover that their opinions are considered problematic
I think people are being very naive if they don't acknowledge that the queer/drag element has played a huge part on the confected outrage to this.
Ick.Who is arguing that adolescents should be exposed to lap dancing? This was very mild burlesque as part of a much wider performance in front of babies who won't have any idea what's going on. If it was in a film I doubt it would even be PG.