beesonthewhatnow
going deaf for a living
Anyone thinking 6 year olds aren’t aware of and thinking about gender norms, needs to go look in their local toy shop.
No-one's kids think very deeply about gender norms: but they're bombarded every day with information about what a girl or a boy is, and how a girl or a boy should act or dress or behave, and gender norms - without any conscious thinking about the topic necessary - are formed in their little heads. The explicit purpose of this event is to challenge this bombardment of information - whether it does this or not is clearly debatable, but what isn't really debatable is that people form ideas about gender very early in their lives. If you want to challenge those ideas, then getting to them young is probably a good idea. That's why the fascists don't like it.
DQST don't keep their reasoning a secret:
"The aim of DQST is to capture the imagination and fun of the gender fluidity of childhood, while giving children a glamorous, positive, and unabashedly queer role model. DQST provides spaces in which kids are able to see people who defy rigid gender restrictions and allow them to imagine a world in which people can present as they wish."
Not sure how dressing up as Gruffalo or whatever would achieve those things...
Sure. I don't think anyone here is saying there's anything wrong with it.Used to be mates with one of the reddest of red blooded straight men who would put on a skirt every time he'd had a few drinks. There's nothing wrong with it.
Theres quite a few people on here saying it's a parody of women, is intrinsically misogynistic etc. Maybe I've misunderstood them?Sure. I don't think anyone here is saying there's anything wrong with it.
I don't think it's intended as a 'parody of women' at all tho.
people are poisoned with bullshit from the cradle is the issueThat's reasonable, when our kids were young we emphasised being kind to people - one of the few things they'd get a telling off for was not being kind. Apart from that, they were pretty free range. Most kids of that age are rather lovely and nice, it's the bullshit they are poisoned with in their later life that turns some into assholes.
Or perhaps you have an over simplified view of what drag artists actually doPerhaps that is more an indicator of the amount that mysogyny pervades society than anything else.
That cis men can dress as a caricature of women and perform an act that plays to mysogynistic tropes and not consider themselves as doing anything offensive to women whatsoever means perhaps that the idea that this might be offensive hasn't even dawned on them.
Is that being a drag queen thoughUsed to be mates with one of the reddest of red blooded straight men who would put on a skirt every time he'd had a few drinks. There's nothing wrong with it.
.Perhaps that is more an indicator of the amount that mysogyny pervades society than anything else.
That cis men can dress as a caricature of women and perform an act that plays to mysogynistic tropes and not consider themselves as doing anything offensive to women whatsoever means perhaps that the idea that this might be offensive hasn't even dawned on them.
No it's not, I was just saying. Dressing up in feminine coded clothes isn't bad.Is that being a drag queen though
I said my kids, I don't speak for other people's kids.
It might not be intended but what if people (ie women) perceive it as such?I don't think it's intended as a 'parody of women' at all tho.
What if they do?It might not be intended but what if people (ie women) perceive it as such?
No of course not. Men dressing in feminine coded clothes is gender non-conforming.No it's not, I was just saying. Dressing up in feminine coded clothes isn't bad.
There must be something that differentiates cross-dressing with parody, perhaps? NB I don't find drag offensive generally and I don't perceive it as parody. But there are certainly some very unpleasant characters in that sphere or aligned to it, especially in the influencer world it seems to me.No it's not, I was just saying. Dressing up in feminine coded clothes isn't bad.
No, we are talking about drag.Theres quite a few people on here saying it's a parody of women, is intrinsically misogynistic etc. Maybe I've misunderstood them?
Yeah i totally agree. There's a difference between that and seeing all drag as offensive though.There must be something that differentiates cross-dressing with parody, perhaps? NB I don't find drag offensive generally and I don't perceive it as parody. But there are certainly some very unpleasant characters in that sphere or aligned to it, especially in the influencer world it seems to me.
There must be something that differentiates cross-dressing with parody, perhaps? NB I don't find drag offensive generally and I don't perceive it as parody.
Not all performances and performers are benign - but that's true across the performing boardsYeah i totally agree. There's a difference between that and seeing all drag as offensive though.
Explain why cis men parodying women by dressing up as a highly exaggerated caricature of one and then performing an act that plays heavily on exaggerated female stereotypes is dissimilar?
Drag is not the same as being trans.
Drag isn't caricature, a least if it is done well. Drag artists are aiming for a sort of accuracy, albeit it can be hard to achieve. It just isn't a send-up of women.No of course not. Men dressing in feminine coded clothes is gender non-conforming.
But a performance of/as a hyper-feminine woman caricature (whether you think that is good or bad) seems to me to be about conforming to a gender role.
Oh yeah, we saw that when they were little they all went to judo, same sports clubs etc, my son wore a Pocahontas uniform for about a year because he wanted to be an Indian and had a very mixed group of friends. From primary school onwards they really wanted to conform, which made me a little sad.A friend of mine was trying to bring up her daughter in a fairly gender-neutral kind of way and was pretty shocked that almost from the age of speaking fluently, gender was very important to her.
Eg. not wanting to wear something because “that’s for boys” etc.
I think kids have a drive for finding their place and the majority of them are actually very conformist.
Which maybe things like this could help, in terms of how things go for those kids who are less good at “fitting in”.
That's a good point. I haven't seen as many complaints about degrees of campness though. Do you think it's camp plus feminine coded dress and makeup that = parody in some people's view?Maybe this is where the notion of “camp” and how male gay culture incorporated some elements of feminity can lead to conflation.
Drag queens could be thought of as a case of shifting the “camp” slider up to 11.
(See also Polari)
If it's accuracy then it's even more gender-conforming then.Drag isn't caricature, a least if it is done well. Drag artists are aiming for a sort of accuracy, albeit it can be hard to achieve. It just isn't a send-up of women.
Er, OK.If it's accuracy then it's even more gender-conforming then.
Wow thanks for the mansplaining, fuck.
No, in fact I'd say no drag I've ever seen was a send up of women, drag is almost always a send up of men. The drag costume, as much as anything, is a shield against reprisals.Drag isn't caricature, a least if it is done well. Drag artists are aiming for a sort of accuracy, albeit it can be hard to achieve. It just isn't a send-up of women.
That's a good point. I haven't seen as many complaints about degrees of campness though. Do you think it's camp plus feminine coded dress and makeup that = parody in some people's view?