platinumsage
HaveMyPassword123
Why drag and not a children's entertainer though, all popular kid characters and colourful and fun.
it's not about just being colourful and fun, I quoted their reason for doing it above.
Why drag and not a children's entertainer though, all popular kid characters and colourful and fun.
My daughter befriended some drag artists on Instagram and interviewed them for a school newspaper article. On her own initiative. Her and her friends decided to do something about pride. It was not a task they were given but something they were aware of and wanted to hear about.I'd have loved some good LGBT role models when I was a kid ffs
Well spoteed Batman!I think there's a quoting error, there!
Somehow I don't think costs have any relevance at all.Children's entertainers not being free, probably.
Explain why cis men parodying women by dressing up as a highly exaggerated caricature of one and then performing an act that plays heavily on exaggerated female stereotypes is dissimilar?No I do not, and I do not think drag is like the black and white minstrel show ffs
This is like trying to argue that theatre can be culturally enriching, to someone who has only seen one school play.
Maybe it was just my kids at the age they were reading the Gruffalo I don't think gender, sexuality etc crossed their minds.
No, your right I know nothing about my own children .... what was I thinking!You really think that? Kids just like animal cartoons until they're teenagers?
Libraries are very underfunded, so getting stuff for free is usually pretty relevant. If you're looking for ideological librarians I expect you could find some lefties around of course, but that's in the realm of speculation.Somehow I don't think costs have any relevance at all.
No, your right I know nothing about my own children .... what was I thinking!
I think they didn't care about it when they were six, when they got older they went through the same period of self-doubt and working themselves out we all did.You think they had no concept of gender norms?
You reckon small kids are looking at Tinkie Winkie and solemnly pondering "why does this purple tv-chested alien have a purse, are they a woman" do you?You think they had no concept of gender norms?
You reckon small kids are looking at Tinkie Winkie and solemnly pondering "why does this purple tv-chested alien have a purse, are they a woman" do you?
I reckon kids have well-formed ideas from a very young age of what girls/women and boys/men are supposed to dress and behave like. The notion that these ideas shouldn't be addressed by getting a gender-non-confirming person to read them story, but we should just plonk them in front of Frozen instead is a bit weird tbh.
How often have you discussed gender norms with a sex-year-old?
If parents want to take their kids to these events good luck to them, they seem pretty harmless fun and if the kids and parents enjoy it that's great. I think the idea that four to seven years olds are going to walk away from them questioning the nature of social norms is somewhat far-fetched IMHO.
DQST isn't about "discussing" gender norms though is it?
No one is forcing parents to send their kids to these events.
I don’t think the drag queens are free either - they need to get paid too!Children's entertainers not being free, probably.
Where have a said anyone is forced to attend?
I don't have any criticism, I've simply said that my kids at six-year-olds won't be thinking about gender norms when being read a child's book. You've gone off on your own tangent.So what's your criticism of DQST exactly?
I don't have any criticism, I've simply said that my kids at six-year-olds won't be thinking about gender norms when being read a child's book. You've gone off on your own tangent.
I even called it harmless fun which seems to upset you.
I said my kids, I don't speak for other people's kids.I posted the DQST rationale, you responded by implying it wasn't relevant to your children, and by implication, other children. Presumably you think it won't achieve its stated aims. That sounds like a criticism of it to me
"The aim of DQST is to capture the imagination and fun of the gender fluidity of childhood, while giving children a glamorous, positive, and unabashedly queer role model. DQST provides spaces in which kids are able to see people who defy rigid gender restrictions and allow them to imagine a world in which people can present as they wish."
Actually, women can object to it regardless that they are always at the bottom of the identity politics hierarchy…
No-one's kids think very deeply about gender norms: but they're bombarded every day with information about what a girl or a boy is, and how a girl or a boy should act or dress or behave, and gender norms - without any conscious thinking about the topic necessary - are formed in their little heads. The explicit purpose of this event is to challenge this bombardment of information - whether it does this or not is clearly debatable, but what isn't really debatable is that people form ideas about gender very early in their lives. If you want to challenge those ideas, then getting to them young is probably a good idea. That's why the fascists don't like it.I've simply said that my kids at six-year-olds won't be thinking about gender norms
Absolutely, and I think that gender norms should be challenged.No-one's kids think very deeply about gender norms: but they're bombarded every day with information about what a girl or a boy is, and how a girl or a boy should act or dress or behave, and gender norms - without any conscious thinking about the topic necessary - are formed in their little heads. The explicit purpose of this event is to challenge this bombardment of information - whether it does this or not is clearly debatable, but what isn't really debatable is that people form ideas about gender very early in their lives. If you want to challenge those ideas, then getting to them young is probably a good idea. That's why the fascists don't like it.
Used to be mates with one of the reddest of red blooded straight men who would put on a skirt every time he'd had a few drinks. There's nothing wrong with it.Are drag queens gender non-conforming? I thought it was more about presenting a very exaggerated female gender performance?
Dave, the builder and single dad who loves pink handbags and glitter might be gender non-conforming, but not sure Trixie or Bianca with a tight dress, big boobs and loads of make up is.
Tbh I agree I don't usually like drag because I find people talking in exaggerated high pitched voices for comedy effect annoying