Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Drag Queen Story Times picketed by protestors who claim that it grooms children and promotes paedophilia

No I do not, and I do not think drag is like the black and white minstrel show ffs 🙄

This is like trying to argue that theatre can be culturally enriching, to someone who has only seen one school play.
Explain why cis men parodying women by dressing up as a highly exaggerated caricature of one and then performing an act that plays heavily on exaggerated female stereotypes is dissimilar?

Drag is not the same as being trans.
 
Somehow I don't think costs have any relevance at all.
Libraries are  very underfunded, so getting stuff for free is usually pretty relevant. If you're looking for ideological librarians I expect you could find some lefties around of course, but that's in the realm of speculation.
 
I have a question about language. The drag queens I knew twenty five years ago didn't perform on stage. They called themselves drag queens and dressed as women all the time, not just to put on shows . Contrast that with Lily Savage who also presents lovely TV shows about dogs as Paul O'Grady.

Is "drag queen" now restricted to the stage personas?
 
You reckon small kids are looking at Tinkie Winkie and solemnly pondering "why does this purple tv-chested alien have a purse, are they a woman" do you?

I reckon kids have well-formed ideas from a very young age of what girls/women and boys/men are supposed to dress and behave like. The notion that these ideas shouldn't be addressed by getting a gender-non-confirming person to read them story, but we should just plonk them in front of Frozen instead is a bit weird tbh.
 
I reckon kids have well-formed ideas from a very young age of what girls/women and boys/men are supposed to dress and behave like. The notion that these ideas shouldn't be addressed by getting a gender-non-confirming person to read them story, but we should just plonk them in front of Frozen instead is a bit weird tbh.

How often have you discussed gender norms with a sex-year-old?

If parents want to take their kids to these events good luck to them, they seem pretty harmless fun and if the kids and parents enjoy it that's great. I think the idea that four to seven years olds are going to walk away from them questioning the nature of social norms is somewhat far-fetched IMHO.
 
How often have you discussed gender norms with a sex-year-old?

If parents want to take their kids to these events good luck to them, they seem pretty harmless fun and if the kids and parents enjoy it that's great. I think the idea that four to seven years olds are going to walk away from them questioning the nature of social norms is somewhat far-fetched IMHO.

DQST isn't about "discussing" gender norms though is it?

No one is forcing parents to send their kids to these events.
 
Kids often express strong opinions, including sometimes on gender, but I don't think these necessarily come from well-formed ideas. Being kids and all they don't have depth of knowledge, but they do reflect what they see around them, mapped as best it can be against their internal world. With a bit of luck that becomes a well-formed idea over time. But when little they can simultaneously be pretty hot on boys not wearing pink, and fine with the concept of a Tinky Winky.

Though that all said, I think we're rapidly moving into realms which are very hard to really understand even by experts, let alone opinionated gits on Urban. Kids' psychology and learning processes is a hell of a topic.
 
Last edited:
Are drag queens gender non-conforming? I thought it was more about presenting a very exaggerated female gender performance?

Dave, the builder and single dad who loves pink handbags and glitter might be gender non-conforming, but not sure Trixie or Bianca with a tight dress, big boobs and loads of make up is.
 
So what's your criticism of DQST exactly?
I don't have any criticism, I've simply said that my kids at six-year-olds won't be thinking about gender norms when being read a child's book. You've gone off on your own tangent.

I even called it harmless fun which seems to upset you.
 
I don't have any criticism, I've simply said that my kids at six-year-olds won't be thinking about gender norms when being read a child's book. You've gone off on your own tangent.

I even called it harmless fun which seems to upset you.

I posted the DQST rationale, you responded by implying it wasn't relevant to your children, and by implication, other children. Presumably you think it won't achieve its stated aims. That sounds like a criticism of it to me :confused:

"The aim of DQST is to capture the imagination and fun of the gender fluidity of childhood, while giving children a glamorous, positive, and unabashedly queer role model. DQST provides spaces in which kids are able to see people who defy rigid gender restrictions and allow them to imagine a world in which people can present as they wish."
 
I posted the DQST rationale, you responded by implying it wasn't relevant to your children, and by implication, other children. Presumably you think it won't achieve its stated aims. That sounds like a criticism of it to me :confused:

"The aim of DQST is to capture the imagination and fun of the gender fluidity of childhood, while giving children a glamorous, positive, and unabashedly queer role model. DQST provides spaces in which kids are able to see people who defy rigid gender restrictions and allow them to imagine a world in which people can present as they wish."
I said my kids, I don't speak for other people's kids.

Keep trying I'm sure you'll turn it into an argument at some point, even though I've said they are harmless fun, people protesting them are weirdos & if kids and parents enjoy it that's great.
 
I've simply said that my kids at six-year-olds won't be thinking about gender norms
No-one's kids think very deeply about gender norms: but they're bombarded every day with information about what a girl or a boy is, and how a girl or a boy should act or dress or behave, and gender norms - without any conscious thinking about the topic necessary - are formed in their little heads. The explicit purpose of this event is to challenge this bombardment of information - whether it does this or not is clearly debatable, but what isn't really debatable is that people form ideas about gender very early in their lives. If you want to challenge those ideas, then getting to them young is probably a good idea. That's why the fascists don't like it.
 
No-one's kids think very deeply about gender norms: but they're bombarded every day with information about what a girl or a boy is, and how a girl or a boy should act or dress or behave, and gender norms - without any conscious thinking about the topic necessary - are formed in their little heads. The explicit purpose of this event is to challenge this bombardment of information - whether it does this or not is clearly debatable, but what isn't really debatable is that people form ideas about gender very early in their lives. If you want to challenge those ideas, then getting to them young is probably a good idea. That's why the fascists don't like it.
Absolutely, and I think that gender norms should be challenged.

However, as said, drag is a parody of women.

Challenging gender norms might be having stories read by trans people, not cis men.
 
Are drag queens gender non-conforming? I thought it was more about presenting a very exaggerated female gender performance?

Dave, the builder and single dad who loves pink handbags and glitter might be gender non-conforming, but not sure Trixie or Bianca with a tight dress, big boobs and loads of make up is.
Used to be mates with one of the reddest of red blooded straight men who would put on a skirt every time he'd had a few drinks. There's nothing wrong with it.
 
Back
Top Bottom