Donald Trump, the road that might not lead to the White House!

[seventh bullet]

Think about it, old son. You came back spoiling for a fight. But not actually knowing anything about American people...

When you post something about Russia I'll ask you if you've been there to try and delegitimise what you have to say.

 

[snadge]

I've been reading for over 40 years. But not all of us can be as clever as the elite here.

Trump got a higher percentage of Black, Female and Hispanic votes, even Asian votes, he also got more votes from the LGBT community.

Stop it.

Or do you think that those people that voted for Clinton are worth more?

 

[krtek a houby]

I've lived there. Does that make my opinion worth more?

Nah, your opinion is as good as mine or anyone else here. But you seem to be quite determined, all the same.

 

[krtek a houby]

When you post something about Russia I'll ask you if you've been there to try and delegitimise what you have to say.

But you have nothing to say, darling. Nothing at all.

 

[krtek a houby]

Trump got a higher percentage of Black, Female and Hispanic votes, even Asian votes, he also got more votes from the LGBT community.

Stop it.

Can you back that up with links?

 

[seventh bullet]

But you have nothing to say, darling. Nothing at all.

You like talking about yourself.

 

[Johnny Canuck3]

Trump got a higher percentage of Black, Female and Hispanic votes,

A higher percentage than who, or what?

 

[snadge]

Can you back that up with links?

Fucking try google, there are even breakdowns for state, fuck me, it's the same for about 7 pages of google, I didn't use infowars.com if that is what you are insinuating.

For some one that doesn't know what identity politics you sure wear their strip.

US elections, voting by sexuality - Google Search

 

[Johnny Canuck3]

What I find on Google, is that Trump got an incredibly low percentage of the black vote; also on Google is the fact that Clinton won the popular vote by 3 million votes.

 

[snadge]

What I find on Google, is that Trump got an incredibly low percentage of the black vote; also on Google is the fact that Clinton won the popular vote by 3 million votes.

Hit the shelters, it's carpet bombing time.

 

[snadge]

What I find on Google, is that Trump got an incredibly low percentage of the black vote; also on Google is the fact that Clinton won the popular vote by 3 million votes.

I'm looking at countrywide, I know there are problems in Hicksville SUS with unregistered voters etc.

 

[Johnny Canuck3]

Hit the shelters, it's carpet bombing time.

I was just asking you for clarification of your comment that Trump got 'a higher percentage of black votes'.

A higher percentage than who, or what?

 

[maomao]

What I find on Google, is that Trump got an incredibly low percentage of the black vote; also on Google is the fact that Clinton won the popular vote by 3 million votes.

He got more black voters than Romney.

What I have been unable to find is turnout figures for the black population. More people voted for no-one than voted for any of the candidates.

 

[snadge]

I was just asking you for clarification of your comment that Trump got 'a higher percentage of black votes'.

A higher percentage than who, or what?

Look above your post.

 

[Johnny Canuck3]

He got more black voters than Romney.

.

That's interesting.

The picture gets more complicated when comparing this with prior elections:

Trump performed better with black voters than McCain did in 2008, and on par with Bush’s performance in 2000.

Trump performed as well as McCain did with Latino voters in 2008, and did only somewhat worse than Bush in 2000

Trump got more votes from people of color than Romney did. Here’s the data.

It seems reasonable to think that a percentage of conservative black voters voted for the black candidate in the two elections involving Barack Obama.

Another interesting fact - from the exit polls -

Trump actually performed slightly worse among white voters than Mitt Romney did.

- same article

 

[Johnny Canuck3]

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) says President-elect Donald Trump is at odds with nearly the entire Senate over whether Russia interfered in the election.

“There are 100 United States senators. ... I would say that 99 percent of us believe that the Russians did this, and we’re going to do something about it,” Graham told CNN’s Jim Sciutto on “The Situation Room” on Tuesday.

Graham: 99 percent of senators believe Russia interfered in election

 

[Johnny Canuck3]

Here's a good one:

Why shouldn’t the president surround himself with successful people? Wealthy folks have no need to steal or engage in corruption.

The Trump Transition Is Transcendent, but the Economy Needs Attention Now

The author is short listed to head Trump's Council of Economic Advisors.

 

[Bernie Gunther]

Graham: 99 percent of senators believe Russia interfered in election

Have any of them any ideas on what to do about that?

Or even on what exactly 'Russian Interference' is meant to have consisted of?

 

[Johnny Canuck3]

Have any of them any ideas on what to do about that?

Or even on what exactly 'Russian Interference' is meant to have consisted of?

Those are both good questions.

 

[snadge]

Those are both good questions.

Yeah because guess what, it wasn't the fucking Ruskies.

 

[Johnny Canuck3]

Certainty: such a rare and valuable commodity.

 

[Casually Red]

I have. From start to finish. Which is why I'm so interested in these instances of Trump apologising.

The only examples of note have been from Casually Red and squirrelp neither of whom have been involved in the current discussion. So examples please.

I've referred to trump as a no good cunt from page one of this thread and regularly throughout . Wanting a Clinton defeat , and pointing out how awful that candidate and everything she stands for is is not Trump apologism . trump is vile , dangerous , despicable ..a horrible cunt . I've made that clear repeatedly .

 

[Casually Red]

How about demonstrating genuine commitment to tackling the inequalities that underpin the divisions?

When history tells folks that such calls for solidarity are mostly about window-dressing, that issues affecting them will always be bottom of the agenda and they'll be thrown under a bus when the going gets tough, don't be surprised if they say, "Nah."

Was a big problem with Sanders campaign - looked great on paper to white folks who are still scratching their heads why Black people didn't fall into line.

I think that was..and remains..an infinitely bigger problem with the Clinton campaign . Who arent merely scratching their heads about people not falling into line but going into meltdown..despite being smugness incarnate right up until the moment reality slapped them silly at 3 in the morning . Which was quite gratifying to watch .

Sanders big problem was that his own party was inherently corrupt ...to its core...and conspired to ensure the other candidate won instead .

 

[Jeremiah18.17]

I'm not going to link it on here, but stumbled across a vid of Bill Reilly talking about the upcoming demonstrations and blockades at the inauguration. Now it may be just the usual far right crap, but in casting resistance to Trump as an attempted coup and assassination, in linking the left with Daesh and in calling on the right to tool up and prepare to support the state in violent suppression of any resistance there is more than a whiff of the US far right preparing to do " a Rwanda" on the largely unarmed US left.

The bloodcurdling threats underneath the vid online only serve to reinforce this.

Looks like things may be about to go to a whole new level I am afraid.

 

[Casually Red]

I'm not going to link it on here, but stumbled across a vid of Bill Reilly talking about the upcoming demonstrations and blockades at the inauguration. Now it may be just the usual far right crap, but in casting resistance to Trump as an attempted coup and assassination, in linking the left with Daesh and in calling on the right to tool up and prepare to support the state in violent suppression of any resistance there is more than a whiff of the US far right preparing to do " a Rwanda" on the largely unarmed US left.

The bloodcurdling threats underneath the vid online only serve to reinforce this.

Looks like things may be about to go to a whole new level I am afraid.

Rwanda ?

Rwanda ?



Ok..how many million US liberals do you think might die in the first month of this Trumpocide ? Ball park figure ? 2 million...3 million ?

 

[Jeff Robinson]

There is an actual fairly interesting spat between the alt right and the rest of the Trump movement at the moment, might be interesting to discuss but instead we are still stuck on attacking anyone who actually wants to talk about politics.

Please post on this thread:

The Alt-Right

 

[Jeremiah18.17]

Rwanda ?

Rwanda ?



Ok..how many million US liberals do you think might die in the first month of this Trumpocide ? Ball park figure ? 2 million...3 million ?

Scoff away, hope you are justified in scoffing. But from what I can see there is going to be blood in America. O'Reilly, the Breitbart gang, the xtian fundies are talking the language of civil war. They are now not sounding too different from fruit loop Alex Jones and his guest last month:

"MATT BRACKEN: Demographically, we’re doomed. If they keep the borders wide open for another election cycle, if they get another couple Ruth Bader Ginsburgs on the Supreme Court, then the only way back will be a shooting civil war. And a shooting civil war today won’t be a clean North-South thing – like war in northern Virginia with a line around Richmond, it’s going to be more like Bloody Kansas, or Missouri, with Quantrill and the Red Legs. It'll be a war of assassinations, IEDs -- it’s going to be a really nasty war.

ALEX JONES (HOST): It’s going to be the war of the death squads.

BRACKEN: Yeah. Or like Argentina in the ‘70s with people being taken out on helicopters and thrown out in the ocean. It’s going to be that kind of a war."

Do you think "liberals" are the only target and Putinbot "reds" like yourself will be safe from the "purge" ?

 

[hot air baboon]

...from Putin's recent press conference...

 

[TomUS]

I'm not going to link it on here, but stumbled across a vid of Bill Reilly talking about the upcoming demonstrations and blockades at the inauguration. Now it may be just the usual far right crap, but in casting resistance to Trump as an attempted coup and assassination, in linking the left with Daesh and in calling on the right to tool up and prepare to support the state in violent suppression of any resistance there is more than a whiff of the US far right preparing to do " a Rwanda" on the largely unarmed US left.

The bloodcurdling threats underneath the vid online only serve to reinforce this.

Looks like things may be about to go to a whole new level I am afraid.

Could get pretty nasty. Trump is the most hated and feared president elect in living memory. I went to Bush's "counter-inaugural" for his 2nd term and it was wimpy and disorganized. But the Donald is infinitely worse and has very violence prone followers.

On top of the daunting threats to any inaugural ceremony, the three dozen agencies responsible for security at the Jan. 20 festivities are preparing for the possibility of large numbers of protesters flooding the capital, along with what may be nearly a million supporters of Mr. Trump.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/27/us/politics/donald-trump-inauguration-security.html?_r=0

 

[Casually Red]

Scoff away, hope you are justified in scoffing. But from what I can see there is going to be blood in America. O'Reilly, the Breitbart gang, the xtian fundies are talking the language of civil war. They are now not sounding too different from fruit loop Alex Jones and his guest last month:

"MATT BRACKEN: Demographically, we’re doomed. If they keep the borders wide open for another election cycle, if they get another couple Ruth Bader Ginsburgs on the Supreme Court, then the only way back will be a shooting civil war. And a shooting civil war today won’t be a clean North-South thing – like war in northern Virginia with a line around Richmond, it’s going to be more like Bloody Kansas, or Missouri, with Quantrill and the Red Legs. It'll be a war of assassinations, IEDs -- it’s going to be a really nasty war.

ALEX JONES (HOST): It’s going to be the war of the death squads.

BRACKEN: Yeah. Or like Argentina in the ‘70s with people being taken out on helicopters and thrown out in the ocean. It’s going to be that kind of a war."

Do you think "liberals" are the only target and Putinbot "reds" like yourself will be safe from the "purge" ?

Yeah because I don't live other there, I don't take Alex Jones seriously and because there isn't going to be a feckin Rwanda genocide in the US . Wise up .

Even on invowars they're surmising it'll only be as bad as Guatemala or El Salvador .