Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Donald Trump the road that might not lead to the White House - Redux 2024 thread.

He's getting even crazier.


Donald Trump tried to reset his campaign at a rally in battleground Pennsylvania on Saturday as polls show Kamala Harris pulling ahead in key swing states.

But the former president quickly broke away from the prepared speech about economic issues to launch personal attacks on Harris including accusations that her agenda is both communist and fascist, and that she has “the laugh of a crazy person”.

And, that ^^ is why I laughed at the idea of him under going training for the TV debate with KH, it will never work, he just can't help himself.

Then..

“They’ll say he was rambling. I don’t ramble. I’m a really smart guy, you know, really smart. I don’t ramble. But the other day, anytime I hit too hard, they say he was rambling, rambling,” he said.

Yep, no rambling there, nothing to see here, move along.
 

Pro-Trump local election officials may try to slow down the certification of election results in November based on unsubstantiated allegations of widespread voter fraud – but legal experts say those efforts alone won’t secure the White House for the former president.

Instead, legal experts say they’re more concerned about the role of state legislatures and the Trump-friendly Supreme Court coming to Trump's aid as he sows the kind of discord and doubt in the nation’s electoral processes that preceded the violence of the riot in the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.


Berwick said Trump and allies’ narratives about undocumented voters on the voter rolls will set the ground for their plan to fight the election results.

“We're likely to see mass challenges to voter eligibility,” he said. “We're likely to see more threats to election officials. We're likely to see post-election litigation based on some of these conspiracy theories. We're likely to see officials, some county, refusing to certify results.”

OTHER LEGAL CONCERNS

Lessig outlined several scenarios that could provide favorable legal arguments for Trump.

The 2022 electoral count reform law requires the governor of a state to certify the winner six days before the electors are to vote.


Lessig said hypothetically, a governor could certify that Trump is the winner “only because those other counties have not sent in their votes."

"That creates a real problem, because there's no mechanism on the Electoral Count Reform Act to recognize a recount,” he said.

Lessig said if that happens and Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris takes it to court, the legal battle could stretch until after the day electors are supposed to vote. “It could be that even if the Harris team should win, they can’t win,” Lessig said.
Haven't seen anything on how easy it is for republicans to delete people off voter lists, though.

The bit about certifying the winner six days before the electors are to vote confused me, but I think 'electors' refers to people who have to confirm the vote.
 


Haven't seen anything on how easy it is for republicans to delete people off voter lists, though.

The bit about certifying the winner six days before the electors are to vote confused me, but I think 'electors' refers to people who have to confirm the vote.

i have no connection to this blog but the guy is documenting it

 
And, that ^^ is why I laughed at the idea of him under going training for the TV debate with KH, it will never work, he just can't help himself.

Then..



Yep, no rambling there, nothing to see here, move along.
I just read that he is being coached for the debate by Tulsi Gabbard 😄. That's a sure fire winner for him.

Anyway, this is delicious. The poor lamb 🤣.



Imagine going for the job of the President, and being such a fucking whining, crying man baby, that you have to be shielded from the facts.
 
I just read that he is being coached for the debate by Tulsi Gabbard 😄. That's a sure fire winner for him.

Anyway, this is delicious. The poor lamb 🤣.



Imagine going for the job of the President, and being such a fucking whining, crying man baby, that you have to be shielded from the facts.

" unnamed sources spoke to Rolling Stone", I believe this guy about as much as the Loons on the republican side, the country has turned into a bunch of children trying to bully each other with name calling and invented slurs, pathetic
 
" unnamed sources spoke to Rolling Stone", I believe this guy about as much as the Loons on the republican side, the country has turned into a bunch of children trying to bully each other with name calling and invented slurs, pathetic
Hmm, get out of bed the wrong side?

Farron is a very well-known and respected commentator. If you don't like him, don't watch him.
 
Hmm, get out of bed the wrong side?

Farron is a very well-known and respected commentator. If you don't like him, don't watch him.

Not to defend the bigot (Russ) but is Farron well respected? I haven't clicked on the video as from previous experience, they have been mostly hyperbole or click baity.
 
Not to defend the bigot (Russ) but is Farron well respected? I haven't clicked on the video as from previous experience, they have been mostly hyperbole or click baity.
Well, he seems to be one of the top rated progressive commentators, and is often used by Pakman as a fill in when he is away. I don't see the very rational and very fair-minded and not at all hyperbolic Pakman entrusting him to keep his seat warm if he were a shock jock. He is also a political scientist, with expertise on polling, who works on America's Lawyer, amongst other things, and in his day job works with lawyers, although not a lawyer himself.

I enjoy his output, as he does it with a very good comic timing, and he will own up if he has got something wrong.
 
Well, he seems to be one of the top rated progressive commentators, and is often used by Pakman as a fill in when he is away. I don't see the very rational and very fair-minded and not at all hyperbolic Pakman entrusting him to keep his seat warm if he were a shock jock. He is also a political scientist, with expertise on polling, who works on America's Lawyer, amongst other things, and in his day job works with lawyers, although not a lawyer himself.

I enjoy his output, as he does it with a very good comic timing, and he will own up if he has got something wrong.
I like him, although Pakman's not above the old hyperbole and bait, himself, tbh.
 
I like him, although Pakman's not above the old hyperbole and bait, himself, tbh.
I find Pakman one of the most even-handed and balanced of the many commentators. He easily holds his own in debates with the rabid right, in that he does not lose his cool, but trounces them with cool logic.

Farron could do a comedy show with his comic timing and impressions. That Pakman trusts him to stand in for him, with his record of integrity speaks volumes.
 

Former President Donald Trump boasted about his standing in the polls when they showed him leading President Joe Biden earlier this year. Now, he's calling those same polls "fake."

Recent polls have found that Vice President Kamala Harris and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz have a national multi-point lead over the GOP ticket.

Fox News noticed and asked Sen. JD Vance about them in an interview on Sunday.

"The media uses fake polls to drive down Republican turnout and to create dissension and conflict with Republican voters. I'm telling you, every single person who's watching this, the Trump campaign is in a very, very good spot. We're gonna win this race," Vance said.
 
"The media uses fake polls to drive down Republican turnout and to create dissension and conflict with Republican voters. I'm telling you, every single person who's watching this, the Trump campaign is in a very, very good spot. We're gonna win this race," Vance said.
Wouldn't Harris being in front prompt Trump-leaning voters to make an effort to get out and vote?
 
" unnamed sources spoke to Rolling Stone", I believe this guy about as much as the Loons on the republican side, the country has turned into a bunch of children trying to bully each other with name calling and invented slurs, pathetic

Citation of "unnamed sources" is a practice that predates the Trump era. You can dislike that if you want, but talking as if something unique to the present political situation just makes you come across as ignorant.
 
Back
Top Bottom