Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Donald Trump - MAGAtwat news and discussion

Oh dear oh dear oh dear


A New York judge has ruled that Donald Trump committed fraud for years while building the real estate empire that catapulted him to fame and the White House.

Judge Arthur Engoron, ruling Tuesday in a civil lawsuit brought by Letitia James, New York’s attorney general, found that the former US president and his company deceived banks, insurers and others by massively overvaluing his assets and exaggerating his net worth on paperwork.

oh dear oh dear oh dear

non-jury trial
oh dear oh dear oh dear
 
"the judge ordered the Trump Organization to cancel its New York business certificates"

What does that mean? And what are the implications?
 
Last edited:
China overtook the US as the biggest polluter of CO2 a few years ago. The US is now the second biggest polluter.


Quatar is the biggest polluter by per capita emissions.

CO2 emitted by energy production in the US has been dropping. It's now down 17% from its peak:


A number of states are now at or above 50% carbon neutral. In those states where it's still really high, are all red states:

I’m more interested in the consumption that causes the CO2 to be produced than I am in where precisely the CO2 production happens as a result of that cause. Given that the US has a GDP 50% greater than China and given the relative wealth per capita of those two nations and given the extensive offshoring of US production overseas and given all the other structural elements that exist under globalisation, I find it extremely hard to believe that the Chinese people are the driving cause of those emissions.
 
I’m more interested in the consumption that causes the CO2 to be produced than I am in where precisely the CO2 production happens as a result of that cause. Given that the US has a GDP 50% greater than China and given the relative wealth per capita of those two nations and given the extensive offshoring of US production overseas and given all the other structural elements that exist under globalisation, I find it extremely hard to believe that the Chinese people are the driving cause of those emissions.

I think your GDP figures are outdated, but if you're going to use that standard, its mostly the extremely wealthy that are causing most of the carbon emissions. The richest 10% of Americans are responsible for 40% of the US's carbon. Personally, I think it's a red herring to blame the average person since its assuming that's where the decisions are made. It's a common tactic of high emitting entities to point that direction when the average person cutting back has little effect on total emissions. Cuts need to be at the production level to be effective.

A new study, led by the University of Massachusetts Amherst, reveals that the wealthiest Americans, those whose income places them in the top 10% of earners, are responsible for 40% of the nation's total greenhouse gas emissions. The study, published in PLOS Climate, is the first to link income, especially income derived from financial investments, to the emissions used in generating that income.

The authors suggest that policymakers adopt taxes focused on shareholders and the carbon intensity of investment incomes in order to equitably meet the goal of keeping the global temperature to 1.5° C of warming.

Scientists and environmentalists have long known that consumption—the amount and kind of food we eat, the vehicles we drive and all the stuff we buy—is closely linked to greenhouse gas emission. Traditional environmental policy has then sought to either limit consumption or guide it into more environmentally friendly avenues: replacing red meat with plant-based diets or swapping a gas-guzzler for an electric vehicle.

"But, consumption-based approaches to limiting greenhouse gas emissions are regressive. They disproportionately punish the poor while having little impact on the extremely wealthy, who tend to save and invest a large share of their income," says Jared Starr, a sustainability scientist at UMass Amherst and the lead author of the new study.

 
i can feel a

fry.PNG


coming on
 
You realize they've not actually started a war yet. But you feel Ukraine should be left on its own to fight Russia? Full Putin bot too?

There are plenty of NATO troops fighting in the Ukraine, even if they're not officially at war. It's an incredibly dangerous situation, it threatens to be the end of humanity. It's only arisen because Biden's senility has allowed the neocons to do their will. Give me Trump over this any day.
 
There are plenty of NATO troops fighting in the Ukraine, even if they're not officially at war. It's an incredibly dangerous situation, it threatens to be the end of humanity. It's only arisen because Biden's senility has allowed the neocons to do their will. Give me Trump over this any day.
Only arisen because of Biden? Russia deciding to invade Ukraine had nothing to do with it? :facepalm: Fuck me, you've got a brain the size of a planet but are still incredibly thick.
 
Back
Top Bottom