two sheds
Least noticed poster 2007
I don't know, I think we should be getting some of that £30 billion back off Truss for a start.No-one should really ever be awarded $83 million by anyone for anything anywhere in any circumstances.
I don't know, I think we should be getting some of that £30 billion back off Truss for a start.No-one should really ever be awarded $83 million by anyone for anything anywhere in any circumstances.
He's got to post a bond of $83million just to appeal. He can't wiggle out of not paying, he has property that can be seized.and also stop trying to sue the victim again as he would have to put the 83 million in escrow to do it
Nothing just more nonsense bullshit that sounds good to the brainless fucks who support him.What the hell does "permanently barring" someone from the "MAGA movement" even mean?
It will never be paid.
He has to put the money in escrow to appeal. He already did that for the first five million from the other trial.It will never be paid.
No-one should really ever be awarded $83 million by anyone for anything anywhere in any circumstances.
well, well
Donald Trump's donor threat backfires
Nikki Haley received $1.2 million in fundraising after Trump said all her contributors would be "permanently barred from the MAGA camp."www.newsweek.com
"Nikki Haley has received more than $1 million in donations to her presidential campaign since Donald Trump threatened to "permanently" bar anyone who contributed to it from the MAGA movement."
No one should have $83m to pay to someone else.
What the hell does "permanently barring" someone from the "MAGA movement" even mean?
Thing is like at of rich people because of the fibs they just get to borrow it.Fortunately, bearing in mind his tendency to fib, Donald Trump probably doesn't have $83m
I guess time will tell.He has to put the money in escrow to appeal. He already did that for the first five million from the other trial.
He is already being monitored to make sure he doesn't fuck up or sell off a load of businesses so that he can avoid paying.
Stupidly he has been boasting during the trial that he has $400 million in ready cash "more than developers usually have, I'm the best developer" as part of the crap "I don't need the money" defence.
This will have almost certainly affected the amount the court has ordered him to pay.
It's thought that he actually had only about $30 mill and sold off some assets to boost that. Even before lawyers fees and court costs he is losing more money than he makes. He is not "good at biznez"
He will have to sell some more assets or they will be seized . . and they will have to be something quite substantial.
And the £60 million from the Tory lord PPE scam.I don't know, I think we should be getting some of that £30 billion back off Truss for a start.
Fortunately, bearing in mind his tendency to fib, Donald Trump probably doesn't have $83m
He won't have it in liquid cash, but he will have it in assets. He is in a sticky spot though. Even without his lawyer fees and court pay outs, his empire currently costs more than it makes to run. He would have performed better as a 'business man' if he had never done anything with his inheritance.Fortunately, bearing in mind his tendency to fib, Donald Trump probably doesn't have $83m
Yeah, basically this. A very rich person bought a load of buildings in New York just before a massive property price boom. He got lucky. Anyone could have done it.He won't have it in liquid cash, but he will have it in assets. He is in a sticky spot though. Even without his lawyer fees and court pay outs, his empire currently costs more than it makes to run. He would have performed better as a 'business man' if he had never done anything with his inheritance.
The art of the deal my arse.
It’s not about giving her the money, it’s about taking it FROM Trump, as the only thing that motivates him is money.
She does indeed, but the fact is that the large pay out is to hopefully teach trump a lesson, because he didn't learn it last time.Sorry, but I happen to think much of this is about giving her the money.
It was her that was raped, lied about and as a result threatened. In my book E. Jean Carroll deserves every penny she gets.
Are you assured
Yes that was the point I tried to clunkily make.She does indeed, but the fact is that the large pay out is to hopefully teach trump a lesson, because he didn't learn it last time.
11 Million for damage to her reputation
7 million for emotional damage.
65 million is straight up punitive retribution. . . a sum paid to carol just to hit trump where it hurts.
He'll not cough up a cent. He'll be be pleading to his MAGA diehards to contribute to his pursuit of freedom, liberty and yada yada ya...
By what measure?but he won the largest victory in presidential election history, this time it'll be economic successes, trump's increasingly unhinged rhetoric, and Dobbs.
in the same election Trump had the 2nd highest number of votes ever cast for a presidential candidate.
It proves there is a hell of a lot of support there,