8ball
Decolonise colons!
If you are Jewish, then possibly.
Do you think there's anything wrong with putting your penis in a dead pig's mouth?
- Thread starter danny la rouge
- Start date
If you are Jewish, then possibly.
maomao
普費斯
Ok. A salt beef and mustard bagel then?
littlebabyjesus
one of Maxwell's demons
Ah, the hole could come in handy.
Gromit
International Man of Misery
Damn you. i want a fucking egg n bacon sarnie now.
It's an alternative use of something that could also have been eaten.
fucked (tenderised, marinaded) then eaten (with 'jus'), surely.
gimesumtruf
pedant fodder
Yes- Something gets tainted.
Necrophilia and bestiality? Nope. Nothing wrong with that....
danny la rouge
More like *fanny* la rouge!
There's no *need* to pronounce. It's just that the question arose, so I decided to discuss it away from the specific thread. (Some time after the specific thread began). But whether or not one was going to make ones feelings known, it's something that people would have had a feeling about, one way or the other.
danny la rouge
More like *fanny* la rouge!
What?
If I had been writing a book I might have laid all these things out for the reader, but if it's a throwaway poll on a bulletin board, maybe the respondents can say whether they think the alternatives they've thought of make them vote one way or the other.
Is minced pig's head a better or worse alternative? From your post I don't actually know, so tell us!
DotCommunist
So many particulars. So many questions.
I deffo wouldn't put my dick in a mincer. Cameron probably wouldn't either. Not even for membership of the Justice League
danny la rouge
More like *fanny* la rouge!
Certainly easier to fuck a bagel than a sandwich (whatever filling).
But then one bagel would feed fewer people than a pig's head.
What if I got pleasure from buying a sandwich and putting it straight in the bin? I do this every day. I get a rush of enjoyment, however short lived.
maomao
普費斯
It's either a very minor transgression compared to the amount of waste capitalism produces or it's not a transgression at all given that you're actually getting pleasure from it. I had a nutritious and filling dinner last night but afterwards rammed a rather pointless single serving tiramisu down my gluttonous throat. It probably would have been better all round if I'd tried to extract some sort of sexual gratification from the tiramisu. Was that not a waste too?
emanymton
A cat politely sat on the flaming gardener.
Turned off (the mincer not you), not contacted to the power, £100?
danny la rouge
More like *fanny* la rouge!
Of course it's minor. But is the pleasure really relevant?
maomao
普費斯
Unless we're all going to live like Jainist monks. I believe you enjoy jazz music Danny. Is artistic pleasure so much more important and worthwhile than sexual gratification that it really justifies the energy and materials required to press your Thelonious Monk CDs?
danny la rouge
More like *fanny* la rouge!
Ah, that's good. Because now you're getting me to rank needs. Yes, I think hunger trumps artistic pleasure. I also think love/belonging/relationship trumps artistic pleasure. What I'm not so clear about is where sexual gratification fits into that. It's certainly a need, and a physiological one, so quite basic, but it's one that we have social rules about. We don't just gratify ourselves on the bus. We wait til we get home. It's a need that we can fulfil within relationships, and in so doing can enhance those relationships, but there are rules about that, too. Your partner should be in the mood, your partner should not be your child and so on.
So, it's a need that we nevertheless regulate.
However, whatever pleasure initiants get from the pig head ceremony, I'm assuming sexual gratification is, if it exists, only a minor factor. Belonging is the major factor. But one can express belonging in many ways socially, and sharing food together is far more used than shagging food together. Or binning food together. Or burning money together. Those are deliberately transgressive acts.
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
let's ask him and find out
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
use a manual one. or a mangle.
danny la rouge
More like *fanny* la rouge!
Also, I were to say that I got artistic pleasure from binning a sandwich every day, you'd be right in thinking me a twat. Two sandwiches, a bigger twat. A salver? - twatness increases.
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
your twatness would explode if you used two salvers.
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
i'd like to think respect for oneself would be up there somewhere too.
danny la rouge
More like *fanny* la rouge!
And given that the ceremony is deliberately transgressive, I think it fair to infer a degree of deliberate lack of respect. Defilement is part of the thinking. (Which does lead us to other aspects of the general attitudes thereby displayed).
two sheds
Least noticed poster 2007
Noooo not minced pig's head, an actual mincing machine. Concentrate peoples' minds and possibly their penises.
danny la rouge
More like *fanny* la rouge!
Putting their penises in mincing machines? This is not at all wrong if the owners are Tories and the mincer is The People's Mincer.
I thought you wanted to divorce this from its context and just ask about the physical act in and of itself?
danny la rouge
More like *fanny* la rouge!
I wanted to divorce it from the specific person.
As an act in itself I'm struggling with the concept of it existing outside of such ceremonies, if I'm honest. I doubt very much there have been that many people who have considered just in passing, placing their penis in the mouth of a severed pig's head (whether just as a neutral act or for sexual thrills), never mind done it. In all the years of human existence.
fredfelt
Mostly unknown member
You never know, he might have been respectful and ate the animal after putting his cock into it.
danny la rouge
More like *fanny* la rouge!
I think we can strongly infer that this was not the case.
Similar threads
