Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Do you consider yourself an audiophile?

Are you an audiophile?

  • Yes

    Votes: 31 13.5%
  • No

    Votes: 83 36.1%
  • Audiophiles are deluded bullshitters

    Votes: 116 50.4%

  • Total voters
    230
I also personally think that amplifiers all sound the same, or to be more precise, any differences they may have are so small as to be insignificant.

im confused now:D i really don't know shit about this kind of thing, but im after an amp to go with my b&w speakers. And so I just search around on google for ideas and opinions and the same three amps keep cropping up, Rotel ra, Nad and Arcam. These 3 amps will best suit the b&w speakers apparently. So a lot of people keep saying.. why is that? and if its all just about some very minute differences in the specs/and or sound - would u reccommend i just save my money and carry on just using the old kenwood amp ive already got??
 
I like this thread. So tell me y'all (to use Dogbot's vernacular) - what system do you listen to at home?

:D

I refer the gentleman to my reply of yesterday.

"Does it matter? If you're like most audiophiles/people who believe they can tell the difference between interconnects, you'll spout some blather about how my kit is too "consumer-market" to be able to appreciate the subtle differences of the interconnects."
 
im confused now:D i really don't know shit about this kind of thing, but im after an amp to go with my b&w speakers. And so I just search around on google for ideas and opinions and the same three amps keep cropping up, Rotel ra, Nad and Arcam. These 3 amps will best suit the b&w speakers apparently. So a lot of people keep saying.. why is that? and if its all just about some very minute differences in the specs/and or sound - would u reccommend i just save my money and carry on just using the old kenwood amp ive already got??

The only really important bit with amps is that they provide sufficient power for the speakers you have. The make is irrelevant. You'll read all sorts of guff in the hifi mags about one brand or another having "forward presentation" or "involving dynamics", ignore the lot, it's utter bollocks.

If the Kenwood amp you have is sufficiently powerful for the B&Ws save your money, or spend it on a big pile of new CDs :)
 
Oh come on Bees. I'm no confessed audiophile but even I feel compelled to mention that there's more to the sound of an amplifier than its power output.

Speakers remain far more important to me admittedly, but some amplifier brands just tend to sound leaner than others. In real world listening conditions, it's often how the whole set up sounds at comparatively low volumes and so on.
 
you guys are talking a different language! lean? bright? adjectives that don't make any sense when applied to sound.
 
Oh come on Bees. I'm no confessed audiophile but even I feel compelled to mention that there's more to the sound of an amplifier than its power output

Unless you're talking about ones with valves in, I'd bet a pint that you can't tell any difference in an ABX/blind test, once the two being compared have been level matched to within 0.5dB...
 
You think? You'll be attempting to lecture me on Hip Hop next you amateur.

:D

No, no I won't.

Well done, you've WON your self-proclaimed Hip Hop willy waving war, by defeating someone who doesn't care less.

Cool, this clearly makes you far less of a sad old cunt... *snicker* :D
 
Unless you're talking about ones with valves in, I'd bet a pint that you can't tell any difference in an ABX/blind test, once the two being compared have been level matched to within 0.5dB...

I'd take you up on that pint bet fwiw. I can't for a second buy into geeky audiophile excursions, nor claim to identify brand tonality with casual ease, but I have and can swapped in various amps of seemingly identical power outputs over the years with clear enough differences in bass weight and tightness. No idea why - they just sounded different for some reason.
 
No, no I won't.

Well done, you've WON your self-proclaimed Hip Hop willy waving war, by defeating someone who doesn't care less.

Cool, this clearly makes you far less of a sad old cunt... *snicker* :D

You are becoming increasingly tiresome. Putting the issue of your apparent deafness to one side - when did you last have sex with a (live) human being?!

;):D
 
But YOU think all amplifiers and cd players sound the same (and any differences are too small to notice!!)

OK, try this.

Take 2 CD players. Record the same track playing on each into Cubase or similar. Line them up precisely. Invert the polarity of one track. Press play.

Then tell me what you hear.
 
I'd take you up on that pint bet fwiw. I can't for a second buy into geeky audiophile excursions, nor claim to identify brand tonality with casual ease, but I have and can swapped in various amps of seemingly identical power outputs over the years with clear enough differences in bass weight and tightness. No idea why - they just sounded different for some reason.

They key bit is that you knew they had been changed, so your brain tends to latch onto a perceived difference. Hence the need for blind tests etc

It's also crucial that the levels between things being compared are exactly matched (to within 0.5dB). Anything that is louder, no matter how slight, will almost always be perceived as better. Our ears also change their frequency response as volume changes. Hi end and bass drop off as things get quieter (we get more emphasis on the range speech is in), so if something is louder you will naturally hear more bass, and top end will seem clearer.
 
I'm sure amps could make a difference in much the same way guitar amps do. However the only purpose of a hi-fi amp is to amplify the signal from the source so the speakers as is. I worry constantly about what guitar or bass amp I am going to use but I have never ever in a studio or at home given a shit about what amp powers the speakers. It just has to be the right power.
It's not a hi-fi amps job to change the sound, that would be a shit amp and could only involve something like pointless gain, drive, pre-amps tone or eq. All stuff you don't want.
Again, look at the pro amps? What do they do? They work without blowing up. Do you ever see speaker amps in pro sound mags? No. Just like there are no adverts or features on cables. What could you say? They work or they don't work, they have a pretty cover on them? Make any other claim and you would be laughed out of a job.
 
They key bit is that you knew they had been changed, so your brain tends to latch onto a perceived difference. Hence the need for blind tests etc

It's also crucial that the levels between things being compared are exactly matched (to within 0.5dB). Anything that is louder, no matter how slight, will almost always be perceived as better. Our ears also change their frequency response as volume changes. Hi end and bass drop off as things get quieter (we get more emphasis on the range speech is in), so if something is louder you will naturally hear more bass, and top end will seem clearer.

Nonsense - you have previously admiited that differences might exist between components (after all the sound has probably been engineered in a particular way) - so the insistence on 'blind' listening is an attempt (on your part) to make a nonsense of this basic fact. But putting that to one side - if one person can articulate a difference in perceived sound (even during one 'test') your 'all Hi Fi equipment sounds the same' line falls apart!

What system do you listen to at home Bees?

:D
 
Back
Top Bottom