The demand side of things is not 'fussing around the edges'. It is fundamental to how much needs to be done on supply side, and how that compares to what is actually possible and sustainable. And also relevant to reallocating one use of energy to a different purpose, for example when having to deal with great reductions in the amount of liquid fuel available for transport.
I dont spend long seriously engaging with people who seek to diminish half the picture. Its absurd to be that narrow and misses the point.
The point is to reduce carbon emissions, or so I've been lead to believe. Improving the efficiency of energy usage can be helpful in that goal, but that energy has to be generated in the first place, and how that is done matters.
I'm extremely leery of the solutions being pushed which are dominated by demand-side measures. People should not be forced to downgrade their lifestyles because of the petrofuels industry's desperate push to remain relevant.
A shocking clip here from the Thurrock protests. Having to get your 11 year old son by car isn’t an ambulance needing to reach a hospital, and at 11 most kids would be able to make their own way to school unless disabled I should think.
Video shows Range Rover pushing Insulate Britain activist at sit-in
Driver seen inching car forwards on to protesters blocking road in Thurrock as onlookers goad her onwww.theguardian.com
Not sure you can drive over someone without injuring them, however careful you may be.
I work quite near there in a newish town with lots of car-free foot paths and bike lanes. Barely anyone comes to the school from more than about 15 minutes walk away but there's a 45 minute traffic jam outside it every day because people are idiots. The wanker in that clip should be done for assault but she won't.A shocking clip here from the Thurrock protests. Having to get your 11 year old son by car isn’t an ambulance needing to reach a hospital, and at 11 most kids would be able to make their own way to school unless disabled I should think.
Video shows Range Rover pushing Insulate Britain activist at sit-in
Driver seen inching car forwards on to protesters blocking road in Thurrock as onlookers goad her onwww.theguardian.com
While I'm aware that our images of people we communicate with online are rarely accurate, the mental picture that post gave me is comedy gold.If someone’s blocking a doorway and doesn’t move when I say excuse me, I’ll barge past them whilst being careful to ensure I don’t injure them.
there may be a very good reason for them not to let you pass, for example a great hole in the floor.If someone’s blocking a doorway and doesn’t move when I say excuse me, I’ll barge past them whilst being careful to ensure I don’t injure them.
I attended an early IB meeting, & told Liam Norton that alienating people isn't a good way to make a political point stick in the mass consciousness. I also made it clear that with local authority funding the way it is, & with Tories likely to be in Downing St until 2029, LA funding won't get any better, so the retrofitting of council housing to Passivhaus or EnerPhit standard is a non-starter.Dead easy - I don't support then, in fact I oppose them, because I find it easy to differentiate between the aim/cause and anyone who supports it.
I take the view that their actions - including winding up middle class mums in SUV's - are actually turning people against the aim, given that it would make them more comfortable and save them money on heating bills, that they'd otherwise be supportive of.
I oppose EU membership, but I think Farage is an excreciable shit, I believe in healthcare free at the point of delivery, regardless of ability to pay, but I think the NHS is a monolith of inefficiency and bad outcomes...
IB isn't a "spin-off", although there is some crossover (unsurprisingly). XR is a much more "arts-oriented" grouping than IB.Insulate Britain is a spin off of XR (and has sprung 'into action' because of the failure of XR's 2 weeks of protest during the summer). Blocking roads is counter-productive and rightly enrages people. These activists, just like XR, are mainly white middle class folks, which is why they were initially treated with kid gloves by the police and I hear they were even brought cups of tea.
More effective forms of action would be occupations of buildings (such as corporate headquarters or empty commercial premises).
They are a wrong headed group and one that is ineffective and counter-productive. I, personally, do not support Insulate Britain.
No. No, I won't. You can't make me!Will no-one think of the middle class dads in their huge SUVs?
Who do you think you are, ernestolynch?You are already on the list.
They need to directly inconvenience/disrupt those in power & those with influence - perhaps throw a cordon sanitaire around Hampstead, & another around Wimbledon?100% support the protests.
In fact I think their demands are too moderate and - crucially - don't they're being disruptive enough.
Depends who/what you disrupt.Disruption only causes resentment and has little or no impact. Economics has impact. Money. Wealth. Capitalism.
Gets you beaten up by angry grannies, that does!Or smash up a bus shelter.
Yeh I kinda thought again about that statement with killer b responsesDepends who/what you disrupt.
Amazing reporting from the British media again.
For those reluctant to click “you can grow concrete” about sums it up.