Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Diane Abbott suspended as Labour MP.

It's not even so much about being called out, imo. Are we not allowed to have a discussion/debate/argument about this issue?

On this thread, it's been pointed out that DLR thinks it's a racist letter while I don't. Does that mean one or other of us needs to be 'called out'? We disagree. We're allowed to disagree. If DLR were following Starmer's lead, presumably he'd be calling for me to be banned from the thread, and quite possibly thrown off Urban. ;)
When I say being called out, I mean challenged because it's a controversial view and could be construed as being very offensive. (When I came across this stance in a training course many years ago I actually found it offensive and I am not Irish, Jewish or Gypsy/Roma/Traveller).

I don't mean that she should lose the whip and quite probably, eventually, the seat she's held a big majority in for decades and in which she appears to be a popular constituency MP. She's apologised and that should be the end of it.
 
The horrible irony of all this is that she is an active anti-racist in a racist Labour Party, and has experienced serious discrimination from within her own ranks with no official support....

and while the labour racists happily ignore their own prejudice ( apart from limited politically expedient anti-Semitism), continue to block status quo challenging ethnic minority labour party members who would make great MPs, ignore their own commissioned reports that find a heirarchy of racism being practiced, it will be her that gets the boot.

The clear picture is ethnic minority MPs are promoted when they don't challenge the status quo, and preferably play the role of actively perpetuating racist attitudes. Those who try to stand against prejudice are for the door
 
Last edited:
What a weird and silly thing to do, to write a letter to a newspaper and then claim next day that you totally disagree with what your own letter said. Very odd. If stupidity or poor judgement were reasons to get sacked as an mp I’m not sure there’d be many left though.
 
Tomiwa Owolade has published a response to Abbott's letter responding to his article.
Owolade makes a very strong argument, and I also like his wider points made elsewhere about the dangers of conflating US racism with UK racism, but I don't quite see why there is a need to have a dig at Abbott or insist that Starmer's response was right. 'I think you're wrong, and this is why'. Isn't that enough? Why add 'I think you're wrong and you're not fit to be in public life'?
 
I live in the Hackney North constituency and I know two very strong Labour party supporters who don't like her and have said they only vote for her because she represents the party for our area.
Also, I'm only repeating what one of them said, I don't know if it's true, but apparently she has been heard to slag off white people.

I'm wondering if the letter she wrote has been the Labour party's excuse to call her out and there have been other things going on :hmm: just my thoughts of course!
 
Owolade makes a very strong argument, and I also like his wider points made elsewhere about the dangers of conflating US racism with UK racism, but I don't quite see why there is a need to have a dig at Abbott or insist that Starmer's response was right. 'I think you're wrong, and this is why'. Isn't that enough? Why add 'I think you're wrong and you're not fit to be in public life'?
Yes. Better, though, to have left his critique at that. He doesn't seem to buy the 'wrong draft' argument, but then few people will.
And the whole Labour anti-semitism thing is so toxic. I don't get why he has to score extra Starmer brownie points like this either, but maybe he just believes that?
 
'I think you're wrong, and this is why'. Isn't that enough? Why add 'I think you're wrong and you're not fit to be in public life'?
i haven't read that but on this point 100% yes, the opposite, we need MPs who actually care enough to talk about racism rather than bow to the power of those who ignore their own reports telling them their party is racist, systemically ignoring their ethnic minority MPs who complain it is being ignored etc.
blood boiling
 
Whatever the nuances of the letter's content and history of racism/s might be in a wide ranging discussion (not a 150 or so word letter ffs) the complete fucking incompetence and tone-deafness of sending a letter saying Jewish, Irish and traveller people don't experience racism give the context of these arguments and raging problems this has caused in her party the last years is pretty mind blowing.

And then what seems likes minutes later issues a weird apology that incredibly manages to seem more incompetent than the original letter.

Absolute fucking moron, she deserves to be sacked for completely earth shattering idiocy.
 
Whatever the nuances of the letter's content and history of racism/s might be in a wide ranging discussion (not a 150 or so word letter ffs) the complete fucking incompetence and tone-deafness of sending a letter saying Jewish, Irish and traveller people don't experience racism give the context of these arguments and raging problems this has caused in her party the last years is pretty mind blowing.

And then what seems likes minutes later issues a weird apology that incredibly manages to seem more incompetent than the original letter.

Absolute fucking moron, she deserves to be sacked for completely earth shattering idiocy.
She hasn't been sacked. Starmer can't do that. If she had been in the shadow cabinet, then ok, he sacks her. But she's not. She's been purged, basically. He was waiting for an excuse and here it is.
 
She hasn't been sacked. Starmer can't do that. If she had been in the shadow cabinet, then ok, he sacks her. But she's not. She's been purged, basically. He was waiting for an excuse and here it is.

Ok, I was using sacked as a lazy shorthand. Well, exactly, she gave him a very easy excuse. Unless it's part of some grand plan she has, although the apology suggests otherwise?
 
Here are the proposed boundary changes to the Hackney constituencies: existing in dark blue, proposed in light blue.



Screenshot_20230423-180704~2.png
 
What does that mean?

Will the constituency till exist - will the carve up make any real difference?
The ongoing (third attempt!) boundary review process should conclude this year. The next election will be fought on the new boundaries.

For great swathes of London the changes won't matter much to Labour. But all MPs have their strong areas and weak areas; sometimes boundary reviews place an MP into places were they don't have the personal connection/vote they are used to.

I posted that to just provide another element to the story, connected to earlier posts about her standing in the constituency.
 
Back
Top Bottom