Fozzie Bear
Well-Known Member
Yes. No.What does that mean?
Will the constituency till exist - will the carve up make any real difference?
Yes. No.What does that mean?
Will the constituency till exist - will the carve up make any real difference?
They should just kick her out.
Such a useless waste of space
Not entirely sure I’d agree with the ordering but yep.She makes a lot of crappy mistakes, but the level of vitriol directed at her is magnitudes above what is levelled at other dickhead MPs. And you can’t help but feel that is cos she is:
A woman
Black
In that order.
Not entirely sure I’d agree with the ordering but yep.
Feeling quite uncomfortable with non Black people labelling her a racist tbf. And it shuts down any conversations about the hierarchy of racism/differences between groups.
She makes a lot of crappy mistakes, but the level of vitriol directed at her is magnitudes above what is levelled at other dickhead MPs. And you can’t help but feel that is cos she is:
A woman
Black
In that order.
Not entirely sure I’d agree with the ordering but yep.
Feeling quite uncomfortable with non Black people labelling her a racist tbf. And it shuts down any conversations about the hierarchy of racism/differences between groups.
Diane Abbott was near crucified for having a can of mojito on a train ffs.My first thought when I read this was: Braverman. A dickhead is a dickhead. Would you suggest that Braverman deserves a break?
I’m not sure I’m the best person to answer this without stepping waaay out of my lane, but a couple of things that spring to mind are a) a certain levelling quality (to a degree at least) of being a hugely rich capitalist, and b) Tories who are PoC have learnt not to raise it as much.There's also the broader institutional racism issue on the Parliamentary left. Why is it so much easier for people from minority backgrounds to progress in the Tory Party, than in the Labour Party?
They have. They were waiting for any excuse.
Apparently she's a very good constituency MP, but in recent years she's definitely showing problems that make her not really suitable for the job any more.
I'm kinda surprised that almost everyone here is blanketly accepting that the letter was antisemitic TBH. Stupid, yes, antisemitic, no.
Because the Tory party are much better at using tokenism?Yes, she's clearly someone the current leadership want rid of, and this stupid letter is just what they need to do so.
There's also the broader institutional racism issue on the Parliamentary left. Why is it so much easier for people from minority backgrounds to progress in the Tory Party, than in the Labour Party?
That's a really crap comparison.My first thought when I read this was: Braverman. A dickhead is a dickhead. Would you suggest that Braverman deserves a break?
View attachment 371920I've just fired up Twitter for the first time today...saw this and closed it again.
What a cunt....
View attachment 371920I've just fired up Twitter for the first time today...saw this and closed it again.
What a cunt....
This. There was a chance to get into a debate about whether racism is or can be an umbrella term, specific historical contexts, neo-liberalism and material inequality, the language of anti-oppression and the rest. And of course building anti-racist politics from these messy components. But this avoids all of that and plays out along the horrible well trodden path of the post-Corbyn/kieth era.It's not new, as many people have pointed out. I think you'd really need to include the ideas around the construction of whiteness too though, with different groups being considered "white" at different points. Including the Irish. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Irish-Became-White-Routledge-Classics/dp/0415963095
So the whole thing requires a lot more nuance. Hypothetically there may be some specific situations at different points in history and geography in which Irish people can reduce their exposure to racism in a way that black people can't. For example by appearing English and not opening their mouths, which is a form of racist oppression in itself.
Obviously the bit about anti-semitism predating racism is nonsense. It's worth exploring how anti-blackness and anti-semitism are different (for example anti-semitism is one of the few forms of racism in which the victims are seen to be insidiously powerful on a global level).
Yep, very different to the phalanx of rapists in the tory parliamentary ranks.She makes a lot of crappy mistakes, but the level of vitriol directed at her is magnitudes above what is levelled at other dickhead MPs. And you can’t help but feel that is cos she is:
A woman
Black
In that order.
I’ve been at band practice, so a bit behind. And to be honest I’m not sure I can gather the strength to read through the thread. Because, you know, priorities.It's not even so much about being called out, imo. Are we not allowed to have a discussion/debate/argument about this issue?
On this thread, it's been pointed out that DLR thinks it's a racist letter while I don't. Does that mean one or other of us needs to be 'called out'? We disagree. We're allowed to disagree. If DLR were following Starmer's lead, presumably he'd be calling for me to be banned from the thread, and quite possibly thrown off Urban.
It was a dumb thing to say and the apology was piss poor but I suspect there is a lot of unseemly high-fiving happening in Labour HQ at the moment. I'm not a fan of Abbott but I suspect with most other Labour MP's the piss poor apology would be considered enough and there would certainly be no suspending from the party over it.
She doesn't come across as a very good MP but there is a whiff of being targeted here and the chance has been seized.
If someone in starmer's camp had come out with this or indeed anything that caused similar levels of offence, they'd have been given the chance to dig themselves out of the hole they'd dug. Probably with party assistance.Erm, no. Any Labour MP who composed an email like that and then was thick enough to send it to a national newspaper would have been sacked instantly.
She's had plenty of chances. She's not very good at her job, and never has been. Starmer had absolutely no choice. If it was Rachel Reeves or anyone else senior in his shadow cabinet, they'd be gone too. It's indefensible and what's most worrying is that she's clearly been harbouring these views all her career but her inability to use a computer properly is the only reason she's been outed.
Do you think she should have kept the whip?
Do I think Starmer is acting in good faith? Almost never.
No, it’s a catch-all analysis. Worth writing down and looking at from time to time.that's not specific to this thread, though...
She’s far from thick, & she’s bloody good at her job on a grassroots level.Erm, no. Any Labour MP who composed an email like that and then was thick enough to send it to a national newspaper would have been sacked instantly.
She's had plenty of chances. She's not very good at her job, and never has been. Starmer had absolutely no choice.
Erm, no. Any Labour MP who composed an email like that and then was thick enough to send it to a national newspaper would have been sacked instantly.
She's had plenty of chances. She's not very good at her job, and never has been. Starmer had absolutely no choice. If it was Rachel Reeves or anyone else senior in his shadow cabinet, they'd be gone too. It's indefensible and what's most worrying is that she's clearly been harbouring these views all her career but her inability to use a computer properly is the only reason she's been outed.
Do you think she should have kept the whip?