Even jazzz wouldn't fall for that one
To answer this properly would involve reading the bits of this thread I have actually read again - and also the many pages I haven't even looked at. Frankly, I would rather stick pins in my eyes so I will bow out.
Whilst I do not doubt the sincerity of many posters on this thread, I am just left a little uneasy about the amount of over-the-shouldering and drive-by's going on. It reminds me of the abuse detective-boy used to get on occasion (and which I freely indulged in myself).
So when Icke says he's the messiah, he's actually.....
I'm not entirely comfortable with people trying to claim that Jazzz is antisemitic. I don't think he is. Icke is though and the problem I have with Jazzz and his ilk is that they swallow his bullshit far too uncritically (which is ironic really because the sheeple apparently swallow the ill defined elite's bullshit too uncritically). In defending Icke they're making excuses for antisemitism and making it easier for even more dangerous antisemites to disguise their bigotry. But that's not antisemitism, it's just idiocy, albeit potentially dangerous idiocy. Personally I think it's a defence mechanism - he's invested far too much time and energy in conspiraloonery to even begin to contemplate the possibility that the sheeple of urban75 might be right. And so he's willing to commit the kind of crimes against logic and evidence we've all become accustomed to.
Can we all agree that Nathaniel Rothschild is an odious creep?
More like anti-semiotic?
WTC was controlled demolition
About 90% 0f the abuse d-b got was reactive, after he'd posted one of his condescending cuss-laced diatribes.
You are correct, the utter lunacy is rife. I find it a disgusting manipulation. By the same token, one is a hatred of Americans for opposing the USG foreign policy, one is a hatred of Englishmen for opposing our foreign policy... etc.Well, apart from this Guardian piece along with thousands of other similar articles:
Anti-Zionism is anti-semitism
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2003/nov/29/comment
You are correct, the utter lunacy is rife. I find it a disgusting manipulation. By the same token, one is a hatred of Americans for opposing the USG foreign policy, one is a hatred of Englishmen for opposing our foreign policy... etc.
Crazy.
Jazzz, are you ever going to give Blagsta an answer?
He's not answering cos there's no answer he can give which would be both internally consistent with his own beliefs and with what is factually known about the origins of the Protocols. I know he's not gonna answer me, which is why I keep asking.
I know this thread has gone off on tangents, but what has water skiing got to do with anything?a poor man's Jeremy Paxton,
I don't really care how I come across to you. I enjoy prodding Jazzz as I think he's a far right prick.Hmm. Unfortunately though - and I have a very mild, passing interest in this thread - you are coming across as a poor man's Jeremy Paxton, a broken record, a stuck CD.
Have you and he had this conversation - or a similar one - elsewhere?
I'm more worried about this 'White people are from Mars' crap. It's the classic idea of the darker races being more 'in tune' with nature, more 'animalistic', just given a science fiction twist. Jazzz, explain yourself on this, please. It's insulting to champion the cause of a dirty scumcunt white supremacist.
If someone starts a thread on an upcoming event, then it is entirely reasonable for them to be asked questions relevant to that event by other posters - otherwise it becomes more of an advert and less of a discussion.Have you and he had this conversation - or a similar one - elsewhere?
"all White humans are from mars"
He has really said this? Jazzz get a fucking grip. If he really said this, if he is really claiming that different races have different origins like this, then he is not only a loon but he is a nasty racist loon. You insult everyone on here who knows you by pushing the ideas of a racist.
Does Icke really think that white men comes from Mars? Surely not.