The point was whether Icke contradicted himself, rather than whether his belief that the moon is a hologram is false. He could have the belief that the universe is holographic yet still use terms like 'hollow', 'sollid', 'liquid' to define those things as we experience them rather than as they are.
sacrilege!
Apparently you can't take anything other than literally. It was a suggestion that the phrase is so common that your remark is in fact largely irrelevant. But didn't think I'd need to point that out. Obviously, I did.Have I claimed that I own it?
No, I'm remarking on the fact that you used it only after I did.
Do at least try to make your flailings relevant.
would you say that the attribution of protection from serious mental disorder is a positive one?
Why doesn't it allow for it, oh brainy one, given that the terms are only used to express how we would experience it rather than how they actually are. You do understand that point, don't you?He can have the belief, but that doesn't make it non-contradictory. The holographic universe theory that he's badly mangled doesn't allow for the moon being both a hologram and a hollowed out planetoid. I guess that's too much logic for your raisin of a brain tho.
He's arguing that the hollowed out moon bases are noumenal? Then how the fuck is he describing them oh brainy one?Why doesn't it allow for it, oh brainy one, given that the terms are only used to express how we would experience it rather than how they actually are. You do understand that point, don't you?
This isn't his argument btw. You commit fraudery upon him. You do understand that point, don't you?Why doesn't it allow for it, oh brainy one, given that the terms are only used to express how we would experience it rather than how they actually are. You do understand that point, don't you?
Why doesn't it allow for it, oh brainy one, given that the terms are only used to express how we would experience it rather than how they actually are. You do understand that point, don't you?
Apparently you can't take anything other than literally. It was a suggestion that the phrase is so common that your remark is in fact largely irrelevant. But didn't think I'd need to point that out. Obviously, I did.
How can I be 'caught out' if I've never claimed to know anything about it in the first place? Don't flatter yourselves. So I talk about whether the claim that the moon is a hologram and the claim that it has bases on it is in fact a contradiction or not, and then the next thing you know I'm being hounded about the Protocols of the Elders of Zion! ROFL!
She's just argued that icke is outside of space and time. Really. That's excellent waffleThere's no point there to understand, it's waffle from one end to the other. Do you know what a hologram is? I don't care what Icke thinks it means, I want to know what you think it means.
So you don't understand it. Fair enough!There's no point there to understand, it's waffle from one end to the other. Do you know what a hologram is? I don't care what Icke thinks it means, I want to know what you think it means.
wow! you've really convinced me that you know what you're talking about with your argument there!!So you don't understand it. Fair enough!
How do you know how I have to spend my time today. More wild assumptions from the superior 'critical faculties' again, I guess.Wow, 20 minutes to come up with that self-justificatory bollocks? You're slipping!
She's just argued that icke is outside of space and time. Really. That's excellent waffle
How do you know how I have to spend my time today. More wild assumptions from the superior 'critical faculties' again, I guess.
No. If I was trying to vote "fringe right" where I live it'd be UKIP.
So you don't understand it. Fair enough!
So you don't understand it. Fair enough!
I don't claim to be all that well-read on string theory and the more exotic corners of quantum cosmology. Icke does, and he's so far off the ball that he's not even within a 100-mile radius of the pitch. But I do know enough to know that what he's claiming would make batshit dry up in distaste.
You've got me curious now Louis. Who is it that's said to be particularly resistant to mental illness?
To be fair to Faux pas, s/he's only saying that if Icke thinks this then there's no contradictionHowever, you seem to be saying you maintain an old fashioned modernist distinction betwee 'reality' and subjective 'perception' - but go on to make a conscious choice in favour of the perception?? You know there's an objective truth out there, but choose to ignore it??
See, that's the thing with giving it the blah blah blah about quantum phenomena. There's only a relatively small amount of people who can gainsay you, and even the ones who're leaders in their fields often say shit that, to the uninitiated (in quantum physics, not Icke-ism!), sounds as barefacedly bollocks as Icke's witterings. Great camouflage!
We are getting dangerously close to discussing Ick'e epistemology - that's not a rabbit hole/hologram I want to fall down.To be fair to Faux pas, s/he's only saying that if Icke thinks this then there's no contradiction
There is no basis for arguing that contradictions can be demonstrated ever in that line of argument. What sort of idiot thinks like that?To be fair to Faux pas, s/he's only saying that if Icke thinks this then there's no contradiction
Fucking Fritjof Capra has a lot to answer for.