Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Critiquing Oasis

First few dates will be more popular as there's always a chance they won't be together for the later ones :D
Now they're older and richer, I imagine they'll do like the Sex Pistols did when they reformed and see as little as possible of each other on tour by travelling in separate luxury coaches, staying in different hotels and only seeing each other on stage.
 
OK so they shamelessly rip off and regurgitate older rock and roll tropes and styles, they admit this themselves. They are not creating something new, just a more bland mish mash of the hits of yonder. Musically I think the turgid shit they churned out and the excuse for doing it was/is as valid as it is for anyone. Anything goes in music. Copy and evolve / devolve. It's just depressing that the public couldn't get enough of that MOR conservative brown sludge they swirled up on the palate. Oasis don't deserve the pedestal they are on, but the people who put them there deserve the uninspiring, tory boy, rugby league, monkey music they got. The misogyny and homophobia just goes to highlight the depressingly luddite angle from which these little boys approached their 'art' . . . . It also reinforces my opinion that they are all five star twats.
 
You middle class haters just can't stand music made by working class people for working class people. You can't pretentiously pontificate about meaning and subtext when it's just rock and roll :p

you've inadvertantly put your finger on why oasis were a bit shit. They were actaully class traitors.
The great tradition of working class rock/pop music - from the beatles and the who to the pistols to sabbath to the specails to the stone roses and the prodigy and bowie and the smiths and the mondays and many many more - was about youth who were looking to expand their horizons, to reject and transcend the narrowness of what society was offering them, to see what else life had to offer - and taking their audience with them on imaginative and creative jouneys.
Oasis were like parody working class - celebrating the narrowness of their imaginations, deriding ideas or orginality as "poncey" or "middle class" (see also Oi Punk) - and this is refelcted in the recationary and retrogressive nature of their music.
TBF - their early stuff (1st album) did have some cracking tunes (i.e half a world away, live forever, supersonic, cigs and alchohol) - but they never develped on it - just plodding away in the same dirgey vein. And even their good stuff is lacking in any imagination or creativeity in their musicality - no subtley, lightness of touch, dynamics or proper fire. Compare with - say - supergrass, or blur or suede.
They made indie guitar rock (as stated above - outsider/missfit music) for people who wanted what they were familiar with and didnt want to be challenged - and became massive off the back of it - and pretty much killed off the genre as a living creative force in the process.

eta - and all of the above is refected in their "blend in down the pub" sense of style as well.
 
Last edited:
Ah, you can see Prodigy next ti-oh... 😢

Saw The Prodigy in Brighton last year, was fucking great.



Saw Oasis at Finsbury Park, maybe 2002? Worst gig ever, shit sound, shit crowd, and Liam and Noel could not give the tiniest of fucks. Had comp tickets, still way over-priced.
 
They weren't all that when I saw them at Glastonbury in 1995, probably not going to bother 30 years later - still regret not going to the other stage to see the Prodigy that night
sorry to rub it in but - I was at glasto that year - and the prodigy was one of the best gigs Ive ever seen. My mate went to see oasis - and was similarly unimpressed.
 
you've inadvertantly put your finger on why oasis were a bit shit. They were actaully class traitors.
The great tradition of working class rock/pop music - from the beatles and the who to the pistols to sabbath to the specails to the stone roses and the prodigy and bowie and the smiths and the mondays and many many more - was about youth who were looking to expand their horizons, to reject and transcend the narrowness of what society was offering them, to see what else life had to offer - and taking their audience with them on imaginative and creative jouneys.
Oasis were like parody working class - celebrating the narrowness of their imaginations, deriding ideas or orginality as "poncey" or "middle class" (see also Oi Punk) - and this is refelcted in the recationary and retrogressive nature of their music.
TBF - their early stuff (1st album) did have some cracking tunes (i.e half a world away, live forever, supersonic, cigs and alchohol) - but they never develped on it - just plodding away in the same dirgey vein. And even their good stuff is lacking in any imagination or creativeity in their musicality - no subtley, lightness of touch, dynamics or proper fire. Compare with - say - supergrass, or blur or suede.
They made indie guitar rock (as stated above - outsider/missfit music) for people who wanted what they were familiar with and didnt want to be challenged - and became massive off the back of it - and pretty much killed off the genre as a living creative force in the process.

eta - and all of the above is refected in their "blend in down the pub" sense of style as well.
The Gallaghers were a pair of Irish lads (the clue is in the name) who were from Mayo. And ya know who else was from Mayo?



I'd say they expanded their horizons quite dramatically, given where they started from.
 
you've inadvertantly put your finger on why oasis were a bit shit. They were actaully class traitors.
The great tradition of working class rock/pop music - from the beatles and the who to the pistols to sabbath to the specails to the stone roses and the prodigy and bowie and the smiths and the mondays and many many more - was about youth who were looking to expand their horizons, to reject and transcend the narrowness of what society was offering them, to see what else life had to offer - and taking their audience with them on imaginative and creative jouneys.
Oasis were like parody working class - celebrating the narrowness of their imaginations, deriding ideas or orginality as "poncey" or "middle class" (see also Oi Punk) - and this is refelcted in the recationary and retrogressive nature of their music.
TBF - their early stuff (1st album) did have some cracking tunes (i.e half a world away, live forever, supersonic, cigs and alchohol) - but they never develped on it - just plodding away in the same dirgey vein. And even their good stuff is lacking in any imagination or creativeity in their musicality - no subtley, lightness of touch, dynamics or proper fire. Compare with - say - supergrass, or blur or suede.
They made indie guitar rock (as stated above - outsider/missfit music) for people who wanted what they were familiar with and didnt want to be challenged - and became massive off the back of it - and pretty much killed off the genre as a living creative force in the process.

eta - and all of the above is refected in their "blend in down the pub" sense of style as well.
Oasis, class traitors who killed indie... Bastards....
 
Oasis were like parody working class - celebrating the narrowness of their imaginations, deriding ideas or orginality as "poncey" or "middle class" (see also Oi Punk) - and this is refelcted in the recationary and retrogressive nature of their music.

Good post.

Whilst their ouput was both derivative and dire, even worse was that Oasis actively played along with the stereotyping.

They revelled in playing the role of being what the middle class think the working class are like.

They attracted the petit bourgeois in droves who could dress up and act out like they thought the proles did.

And you are right, whilst actually working class themselves (or at least they were until the one from Ride joined), their contribution wasn't to celebrate, defend or advance working class culture it was to parody it and to reflect the limited middle class understanding of the culture back to the middle class.
 
Not sure about the “acting out what working class means to the middle classes” either. I didn’t look down on them. I didn’t see them as a parody. I don’t think they made class a massive part of their mythology tbh, even in their lyrics. But they clearly were working class, and they just spoke for themselves. Half the nation was on the piss and sniff those days and they were just wild expressions of it, and class was just who they were and their background rather than a motive for their rock and roll behaviour.
 
It’s going to be shite - a load of middle-aged buggers drunk on nostalgia and overpriced lager paying top dollar to singalong to NG’s nonsensical doggerel. I’m going to cherish the memories of when their only decent first LP came out and when I saw them in 94/95.
 
Back
Top Bottom