That Tim Holt guy, or whatever his name was, was one I could never get into.
He was playing Donovan to Pratchett's Dylan.
It was one of those series' where the first book starts as a rollicking space adventure and four books later it's turned into a philosophical treatise. Bit like Enders Game. I do remember thinking that the pirate captain, whatever his name was, was a great character though.Not sure that's quite fair. Did you read to the end of it? The entire plot arc is the rise of the character from ultimate victimhood to her being master of the universe. It could be argued that it is an exploitative way for a male writer to write a woman character, but I didn't think that was the vibe of it by the end. It was a while ago I read it though
It was one of those series' where the first book starts as a rollicking space adventure and four books later it's turned into a philosophical treatise. Bit like Enders Game. I do remember thinking that the pirate captain, whatever his name was, was a great character though.
one thing I will say in defense of Tolkien- the epics you get today, the 12 booker mortgage payers have usually a happy ending, if not a return to the past peace but a sense of happy homecoming. We won. Scouring of the Shire doesn't give you that.
gamgee settles with rosyThey all die too. Well, cross to the undying lands... Except Merry and Pippin maybe, I forget.
Which is another thing, we praise Erikson for killing people (and Whiskeyjack's leg is a jolt), and GRRM (not read any of his though) but they're a bit shit at it. I mean the Bridgeburners ascend and become not dead. GRRM seems to be ressurecty too, although I stopped watching GoT and never read his stuff - just going off the endless sidebar articles on 'OMG will X return?'.
gamgee settles with rosy
and on the erikson one- the bridgeburners ascended as whole so I bought it. We were introdced to them at the point of that legendary status so the apotheosis didn't jar.
loved the late stuff so much as well, y'ghatan. Shai'k and the army of the apocalypse.
Proper shite..........soft porny-rapey-macho big old bollocks
It's really worrying that Gor would be a "Men's rights activists" paradise.
I only read the first two, but Speaker for the Dead wasn't that bad.now that's a series that dosen't improve in the later books.
especially when you realise time sadly linear and not cyclicalwhen you do finish, you really wish you'd never bloody started.
massive islamaphobe apparentlyDan Simmons.
yeh but that might be one thing tolkein got right: life has so few happy endings.one thing I will say in defense of Tolkien- the epics you get today, the 12 booker mortgage payers have usually a happy ending, if not a return to the past peace but a sense of happy homecoming. We won. Scouring of the Shire doesn't give you that.
In the Malazan Book of the Fallen many loved and/or interesting characters die a final death without ascending or being resurrected.I do get the bridgeburners as legend, but come on, that's not death. It's not the blank and definitely eternal absence of a loved character.
e2a: except Mappo Runt.
I really enjoyed the hitchhikers books in my youth, but on recently reading the first one again. . .well I'm inclined to agree with you.Maybe not at the very top of the list, but Douglas Adams and Ray Bradbury are certainly massively over-rated for the shite they produced.
Bloody hell. I post the most incediary flamebait I can, slating two of the best fantasy authors I could think of, and don't get a single bite. And then you come along with THIS!I really enjoyed the hitchhikers books in my youth, but on recently reading the first one again. . .well I'm inclined to agree with you.
What, about ray Bradbury too? That's a bit harshI really enjoyed the hitchhikers books in my youth, but on recently reading the first one again. . .well I'm inclined to agree with you.
Adams, while popular, would hardly rank as among the most accomplished fantasy authors. Entertaining nonsense. Pratchett, hardly a literary genius himself, massively outwrote him quality-wise. Bradbury otoh has moments of genius.Bloody hell. I post the most incediary flamebait I can, slating two of the best fantasy authors I could think of, and don't get a single bite. And the you come along with THIS!
oh yeah you read adams for the laughs more than the prose or the story although given the plot was nearly entirely in the service of jokes thats one and the same lolAdams, while popular, would hardly rank as among the most accomplished fantasy authors.
I think the book of his I enjoyed the most was where he and some other bloke used British place-names as words for things that otherwise have no words for them iyswim. Just jokes, none of the other filler stuff.oh yeah you read adams for the laughs more than the prose or the story although given the plot was nearly entirely in the service of jokes thats one and the same lol
I only read the first two, but Speaker for the Dead wasn't that bad.
What the fuck is going on with you recently DotC? See post #113 FFS!bradbury is no way on par with the bad names we've had here. Suck a bollock with your iconoclasm corax. My left one