We're set to now exceed the highest daily deaths in the first wave soon aren't we looking at the figures?
I cant make that claim yet because when going by date of death, daily figures have so far in the second wave maxed out at under half the level of the first wave peak. And there is not a straightforward mapping between how many deaths the number of people in hospital with covid-19 implies, and its probably a fair bit different in the 2nd wave compared to the first wave. I can still say that I expect number of daily deaths to rise in response to numbers of cases and admissions increasing again, but I wouldnt try to guess what levels it will hit.
So far for me the second waves horrible number of deaths is more about how long high rates of death persist rather than quite how high the peak is, and the real picture is obviously a combination of both of these things.
I'm annoyed that media etc arent counting second wave deaths in a way that allows people to get a sense of the second wave compared to the first.
If I count all deaths as being where the actual death happened from September 1st onwards, for the UK using the 'death within 28 days of a positive test' figures I have 41,559 first wave deaths and 27,487 second wave deaths so far. Using ONS 'covid-19 mentioned on death certificate figures' instead, I have 57,641 first wave deaths and 23,658 second wave deaths, but their figures currently only go up to December 11th. I cannot repeat the exercise properly using excess deaths instead, because the excess deaths figures are failing to capture all the second wave covid deaths, presumably because there are less people than normal dying for other reasons, including flu.
It is my intention not to be on here with graphs and figures for at least Christmas eve->Boxing day. So I'm getting this out of my system over the next hour or so and will then break with that side of things for as long as I can get away with.