Could anybody please update me on public transport options in the UK at the moment? If I were to manage to fly back, how would I get anywhere, or are taxis the only option?
They’ve produced some guidance on office working following lockdown. Part of this recommends against ‘hot desking’ for obvious reasons.
Quite amused by this because my old employer (big engineering consultancy firm) was pushing for this in all offices, whereby employers had a kind of locker/small cube somewhere where they were supposed to keep all their crap, finding an empty desk each morning and having to set everything up. It had some horrible term, ‘agile working’ I think, I guess the idea was to minimise number of desks required. There’s a reason they were known as the ‘sweatshop’ of engineering consultancy, with offices more like a call centre than a design office. Ignores that people like to stick pictures of their ugly kids on their desk, or like me fill the big bottom drawer of the desk with food and clothing to change into on arrival. Hope it puts a spanner in their inhuman ways.
He's right to say it's not rocket science. There's nothing there that hasn't been suggested and discussed here weeks ago.Devi Sridhar on what ought to happen.
This is what you should be demanding from your government to contain the virus | Devi Sridhar
Four months in, we know what works against coronavirus. These are eight important lessons from east Asia, says Devi Sridhar, chair of global public health at the University of Edinburghwww.theguardian.com
there's two solutions to the 'no hotdesking' advice - increase capacity so all staff have a desk, or decrease staffing numbers until all staff have a desk.They’ve produced some guidance on office working following lockdown. Part of this recommends against ‘hot desking’ for obvious reasons.
Quite amused by this because my old employer (big engineering consultancy firm) was pushing for this in all offices, whereby employers had a kind of locker/small cube somewhere where they were supposed to keep all their crap, finding an empty desk each morning and having to set everything up. It had some horrible term, ‘agile working’ I think, I guess the idea was to minimise number of desks required. There’s a reason they were known as the ‘sweatshop’ of engineering consultancy, with offices more like a call centre than a design office. Ignores that people like to stick pictures of their ugly kids on their desk, or like me fill the big bottom drawer of the desk with food and clothing to change into on arrival. Hope it puts a spanner in their inhuman ways.
Or keep everyone working from home.there's two solutions to the 'no hotdesking' advice - increase capacity so all staff have a desk, or decrease staffing numbers until all staff have a desk.
First Provisional SAGE meeting starts at 12.
Buses and trains are running, but often with reduced frequency. Might be difficult in rural areas.Could anybody please update me on public transport options in the UK at the moment? If I were to manage to fly back, how would I get anywhere, or are taxis the only option?
Crikey! One of them's Greek, even.I don't think it's going to have sufficient credibility with the media:
Not-So-Independent, Activist-Stuffed Shadow SAGE
Committee includes Boris haters, 2 Labour Party donors, 2 literal Communists, assorted "anti-Zionists", Corbynistas and conspiracy theorists.order-order.com
Guido Fawkes isn't going to say anything different, is he?I don't think it's going to have sufficient credibility with the media:
Not-So-Independent, Activist-Stuffed Shadow SAGE
Committee includes Boris haters, 2 Labour Party donors, 2 literal Communists, assorted "anti-Zionists", Corbynistas and conspiracy theorists.order-order.com
First Provisional SAGE meeting starts at 12.
Or keep everyone working from home.
Wasn't a case of not working it out: the measures listed are for containment, and Whitehall were following a completely different objective, controlled spread, based on a pandemic plan for flu. What we still don't know is why SAGE made the crucial decision to recommend abandoning the containment of a completely different virus, and worse, a novel virus.He's right to say it's not rocket science. There's nothing there that hasn't been suggested and discussed here weeks ago.
Unbelievable that government hasn't been able to work it out and start doing what's necessary.
Given the woes of the current CMO, poorly I hope.Azrael what's your current job and background in this area if you don't mind saying?
Given the certainty of position and massive amounts of knowledge about this subject that you think you have I'd give Downing Street a quick call first thing Monday and tell them you'll have the CMO job. Maybe you could do head of PHE in the evenings too?
Let us know how it goes.
Guido was never going to be a fan who ever was on it though was he?
No, it's not the authority fallacy.Given the woes of the current CMO, poorly I hope.
I'm heartened that you chose to make it personal, because by flying in two footed while the ball escapes you, you've just told me that the evidence is so against you that you can't even attempt to dragoon it to your cause (whatever that is: the authority fallacy?).
I don't think it's going to have sufficient credibility with the media:
Not-So-Independent, Activist-Stuffed Shadow SAGE
Committee includes Boris haters, 2 Labour Party donors, 2 literal Communists, assorted "anti-Zionists", Corbynistas and conspiracy theorists.order-order.com
Guido Fawkes isn't going to say anything different, is he?
'promoted Ken Loach films'
By christ, these people should be locked up.
He's a nasty fucking cunt, isn't he, bringing up Shamima Begum as if that had anything to do with it. (Look, she's Muslim is the subtext there.)
ETA:
I wouldn't normally link to the Mail, but I think it's relevant here regarding credibility in the r/w media. The Mail is very much not on board with Fawkes' characterisation of this, using it instead to have a go at the secrecy of the 'real' SAGE.
Former chief scientific adviser sets up rival to Sage
promoted Ken Loach films
don't post such awful tosh.Anyone claiming that a position taken at that point in the process was unequivocally wrong is in effect claiming some kind of superior knowledge, some expertise exceeding that held by the people involved in making the decisions. So it doesn't seem unreasonable to wonder whether that's what you have.
Allowing a deadly virus to spread through the population when you have the means to prevent it is unequivocally wrong. Are you claiming it isn't? If not, we don't even disagree.No, it's not the authority fallacy.
LynnDoyleCooper is not the only one who is finding your blustering certainty, applied with hindsight to a context where evidence relating to the relative merits of different strategies was extremely patchy (and continues even now to be entirely incomplete), a little wearing.
Anyone claiming that a position taken at that point in the process was unequivocally wrong is in effect claiming some kind of superior knowledge, some expertise exceeding that held by the people involved in making the decisions. So it doesn't seem unreasonable to wonder whether that's what you have.
by 'the people involved in making the decisions' you mean tory ministers.No, it's not the authority fallacy.
LynnDoyleCooper is not the only one who is finding your blustering certainty, applied with hindsight to a context where evidence relating to the relative merits of different strategies was extremely patchy (and continues even now to be entirely incomplete), a little wearing.
Anyone claiming that a position taken at that point in the process was unequivocally wrong is in effect claiming some kind of superior knowledge, some expertise exceeding that held by the people involved in making the decisions. So it doesn't seem unreasonable to wonder whether that's what you have.
Of course Fawkes is a twat but nobody should be mugged that this is some sort of apolitical alternative - King can go fuck himself the twat (although the general idea of alternative SAGEs is good)Guido was never going to be a fan who ever was on it though was he?
Not to mention scores of public health experts outside the corridors of power, who from the moment that "mitigation" was adopted, were screaming that it'd be a disaster to drop containment and allow the virus to spread.don't post such awful tosh.
often enough people outside the corridors of power, operating without the expertise or knowledge of those in the corridors of power, come to better conclusions that the government.
Including ignoring a report that Britain was dangerously unprepared for a pandemic, and failing to produce a dedicated plan for a coronavirus outbreak. The success of countries that'd experienced SARS and MERS in preparing for a novel coronavirus and then containing SARS-CoV-2 should banish any appeal to "hindsight" to get the government off the hook.by 'the people involved in making the decisions' you mean tory ministers.
and we've seen over many years how they manage to take the hard decisions and make the wrong choice every fucking time.
i find it disappointing but not surprising that teuchter thinks tory ministers should be believed, that they have some sort of expertise denied the rest of us.Including ignoring a report that Britain was dangerously unprepared for a pandemic, and failing to produce a dedicated plan for a coronavirus outbreak. The success of countries that'd experienced SARS and MERS in preparing for a novel coronavirus and then containing SARS-CoV-2 should banish any appeal to "hindsight" to get the government off the hook.