I'm suggesting that risk is not a binary, and the more you pile riskier behaviours on top of each other - a semi-enclosed space, packed with people that you don't know, all shouting directly into each others' faces, lots of hand-to-face contact, sharing packets of crisps - the sillier a choice it seems just for the sake of being able to have a drink.
Gardens and parks would seem much safer - more spread out, fewer people, quieter, and also cheaper.
Yes, I think that's certainly right from a personal risk perspective.