Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Climate change policies

I have had concerns about the mass movement of iron ore & " & it means nothing.

Just like the measurements we take today about climate change, It means nothing.

We are humans, devouring this organic material, it is what we do best.
Sorry could you explain exactly how the "the mass movement of iron ore ....destabilizes the planets orbit".
Where are you getting this shit from?
 
Sorry could you explain exactly how the "the mass movement of iron ore ....destabilizes the planets orbit".
Where are you getting this shit from?
2.6 billion metric tons of iron is produced each year on the planet earth & most of it moves from were it was mined, to the production factory & to the end destination, mainly the comerical hubs of the earth.

But it does not matter, we are on an ending circuit of change, one day the energy will stop so we must focus our minds on the present & ways to show the populase that a individual life is non existence, rather a united life is more !

We are a body of humans traversing this universal space & its greedy individuals that are breaking up our community that is the real danger 😢
 
  • Haha
Reactions: LDC
2.6 billion metric tons of iron is produced each year on the planet earth & most of it moves from were it was mined, to the production factory & to the end destination, mainly the comerical hubs of the earth.

But it does not matter, we are on an ending circuit of change, one day the energy will stop so we must focus our minds on the present & ways to show the populase that a individual life is non existence, rather a united life is more !

We are a body of humans traversing this universal space & its greedy individuals that are breaking up our community that is the real danger 😢
Exactly where did you get this ludicrous notion that the earth's orbit is being destabilised?
 
Exactly where did you get this ludicrous notion that the earth's orbit is being destabilised?
The earth weights 5.97 billion trillion metric tons, if 2.6 billion tons was moved each year from it's center of gravity, would that not have an effect on the orbit ?
 
Last edited:
Look we are talking about water & iron now that is moving around the planet in millions of tonnage per year!

Of course this is having an effect on the earth's orbit .

Steel is more condensed than water 💧

Then there is human migration 🙄

 
The earth weights 5.97 billion trillion metric tons, if 2.6 billion tons was moved each year from it's center of gravity, would that not have an effect on the orbit ?
The entire earth's crust is estimated to make up roughly 1% of the earth's total mass, how would moving a small percentage of the crust's mass as iron ore disrupt the earth's orbit?

I haven't seen the Carlin video, I remember him being unhelpful on this subject (not surprising given how much less was known about climate change then), we don't need to save the earth, it'll carry on regardless, climate change is going to put a lot of biological life at risk of death, and extinction, that's what needs to be addressed.
 
Only 2.6e12kg of iron ore?

There are are ~2e12kg of animals roaming the planet.

Over 1e21kg of water are sloshing around on the surface of the Earth...

Over 1e24kg of liquid iron and nickel are moving around in the Earth's outer core...
 
Last edited:
You missed the part about human migration. Imagine the imbalance in the earth's spin caused by everyone being allowed to live in London. Plus they bring over their cousins, and a lot of their languages are really heavy as well.
 
That has NOTHING to do with iron ore.
Iron ore is made into steel,
Steel is used to build massive structures that rise out of the planet which has a measured effect on the surrounding environment.

Every thing on this planet effects the planet
From the tallest building to the smallest microorganism.

I've just picked a very obvious climate change changer.

The majority of humans are hungry for change because there brainwashed by advertisements & unfortunately & ultimately that includes climate change.

Anyway all this talk about climate change policies around the world is utter nonsense when its the continuing expansion of human greed that is causing all this to happen, humans won't be here in a million years but our planet will so the climate change in the long run doesn't matter to our planet.

Imagine your in a boat heading towards a massive waterfall on a powerful river, the boat starts to take on water ! What do you do ? Jump over board ? Start bailing the water out so you don't sink ? Or just sit back & enjoy the view ?

The water represents the planet, the boat represents humans ideas of what should be, so human activity is having an effect on the climate, so is the worms activity & just because we can measure that effect its causing alot of fuss about something that's beyond us. Imagine wearing a watch that counts down to your death, what good would it be ? Apart from driving you mad every time you looked at it.

our values are screwed up, the only reason the climate change policies are been talked about now is the elites of the world are realising the change of weather in there high mountain top mansions & the snow doesn't look quite as nice when its melted.

They have realised that their greed will eventually catch up with them & now there trying to convince the rest of us it's our fault for driving capitalism down our throats.





 
Last edited:
The earth weights 5.97 billion trillion metric tons, if 2.6 billion tons was moved each year from it's center of gravity, would that not have an effect on the orbit ?

Like when someone took out your brain and it keeps making you spin about weirdly?
 
Like when someone took out your brain and it keeps making you spin about weirdly?
Definitely, it completely messes up your centre of gravity, mind you it's been a while since I did the head spin, I was quite good at it in my younger days on the dance floor, I'd be a weird tangle of legs & arms now flapping about 🤣
 
Only 2.6e12kg of iron ore?

There are are ~2e12kg of animals roaming the planet.

Over 1e21kg of water are sloshing around on the surface of the Earth...

Over 1e24kg of liquid iron and nickel are moving around in the Earth's outer core...
In general, the redistribution of mass on and within Earth -- like changes to land, ice sheets, oceans and mantle flow -- affects the planet's rotation. As temperatures increased throughout the 20th century, Greenland's ice mass decreased. In fact, a total of about 7,500 gigatons -- the weight of more than 20 million Empire State Buildings -- of Greenland's ice melted into the ocean during this time period. This makes Greenland one of the top contributors of mass being transferred to the oceans, causing sea level to rise and, consequently, a drift in Earth's spin axis.
 
You missed the part about human migration. Imagine the imbalance in the earth's spin caused by everyone being allowed to live in London. Plus they bring over their cousins, and a lot of their languages are really heavy as well.
Which came first the egg or the chicken ?

 
Last edited:
The entire earth's crust is estimated to make up roughly 1% of the earth's total mass, how would moving a small percentage of the crust's mass as iron ore disrupt the earth's orbit?

I haven't seen the Carlin video, I remember him being unhelpful on this subject (not surprising given how much less was known about climate change then), we don't need to save the earth, it'll carry on regardless, climate change is going to put a lot of biological life at risk of death, and extinction, that's what needs to be addressed.
It takes a lot of energy to move that 1%, Seriously !!!



 
Last edited:
In general, the redistribution of mass on and within Earth -- like changes to land, ice sheets, oceans and mantle flow -- affects the planet's rotation. As temperatures increased throughout the 20th century, Greenland's ice mass decreased. In fact, a total of about 7,500 gigatons -- the weight of more than 20 million Empire State Buildings -- of Greenland's ice melted into the ocean during this time period. This makes Greenland one of the top contributors of mass being transferred to the oceans, causing sea level to rise and, consequently, a drift in Earth's spin axis.
No mention of iron ore extraction, nor indeed any mining activity, there. The paper points out longitudinal dynamical effects of secular mass redistribution in the hydrosphere and the mantle. Diurnal anthropogenic contributions to mass relocation are insignificant. Your bowel movements have an effect but one that is too small to measure and is also ultimately swamped at planetary scale.
 
See Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill: reforms to national planning policy

I've copied, pasted and slightly edited this post about an important consultation that urbanites might like to respond to - apologies if it is already on the boards elsewhere. One relevant aspect is the section "Climate change mitigation: exploring a form of carbon assessment" and specifically question 39:
"Q.39: What method and actions could provide a proportionate and effective means of undertaking a carbon impact assessment that would incorporate all measurable carbon demand created from plan-making and planning decisions?"
Linked here is the work of some campaigning groups, building on SSM's work on conducting a carbon impact assessment of the Greater Manchester spatial plan, Places for Everyone and development of a Carbon and Planning Workbook for community campaigners. There is also the lone example of the Greater Cambridge plan, which did commission a quantitative carbon impact assessment for its spatial options.
Others, particularly those with research or practice interests in carbon metrics and planning might also like to pitch in.
There are a number of other questions worth responding to, including things like the role of local communities in planning and "biodiversity net gain".
You can also refer to the government's proposed changes, to date, but the questions (for example the carbon one) go wider. You can find the Government description of changes here, and the NPPF with tracked changes here.
Please do also share with others, who might be interested and able to respond.
 
Car emissions are a major source of pollution we all know this

Insurance companies should make it available to insure your car daily & scrap this yearly no claims bonus as it obstructs people from car pooling.

90% of putting a car on the road is prepaid, i.e. buy car, tax it, insure it & all that's left is to put the fuel in daily

Advertising too sells us this idea of jumping in your brand new BMW & riding off into the sunset, Such bullshite.... ( Talk about a good cock & bull story !!! )

But like good humans we imitate what we aspire to be & ultimately its our planet that pays the price for our conceit.
 
Advertising too sells us this idea of jumping in your brand new BMW & riding off into the sunset, Such bullshite.... ( Talk about a good cock & bull story !!! )
More and more they're adapting their ads to push EVs in a similar way, with added holier than thou effects.

Electric vehicles do emit less CO2e per mile than diesel or petrol cars. However, given the current grid mix in the UK, they should in no way be sold as even slightly "carbon zero". Being forced to prominently display the emissions, more so than currently, could slightly shift that narrative.
 
More and more they're adapting their ads to push EVs in a similar way, with added holier than thou effects.

Electric vehicles do emit less CO2e per mile than diesel or petrol cars. However, given the current grid mix in the UK, they should in no way be sold as even slightly "carbon zero". Being forced to prominently display the emissions, more so than currently, could slightly shift that narrative.
I live rural so having a car is essential, I did try to live without a car & cycled into town, 20km, ended up with sciatica for a month, had to use the car for everything then but if there was better public transport I would definitely use it more
 
“delegates from the poorest countries had mostly left by this point, leaving mainly rich countries and the richest economies in the global south to hash out the final wording of a document that will shape, to some degree, how habitable the planet remains for all humans”

And that, just about sums it up.
 
Fr0BCA7X0AITzZe
 
We need some cross-party working on this, and across all parties. As it stands whatever either of the two main parties comes up with will most likely be woefully insufficient, painted as "anti-business" or too expensive, or both.
 
Back
Top Bottom