Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Citroën Ami - a tiny, electric 'polypropylene cube on wheels' for urban driving

editor

hiraethified
Now, I'd rather have no cars at all, but if we've got to have them, then I'd prefer these tiny little thid on the city streets. Interestingly, in France kids as young as 14 can legally drive them.

4500.jpg



It can be recharged from a standard home socket in three hours and, in its basic grey-and-orange edition, costs €6,000 (£5,550) to buy outright, or, with €100 down, €78 a month – roughly what most Parisians pay for an all-zone metro and suburban rail pass.

Driving it is a doddle. You sit beneath a panoramic roof in the spacious interior, turn the key, select D for drive from the three buttons to the left of your seat, release the handbrake and depress the accelerator pedal – and off you go, with a surprising kick.

In front of you is a monochrome display from the dark ages showing speed, battery level and kilometres remaining before the next charge. There is no boot, but plenty of neat storage nets for small items and room for shopping in front of the passenger seat.

3000.jpg


The Ami hits 45km/h pretty quickly and can go no faster, but in habitually gridlocked Paris – where speed limits vary from 20km/h to a theoretical 50km/h – that is neither necessary nor, most of the time, even possible (the Ami is not allowed on expressways). The brakes are reassuringly efficient, and a standard parking bay fits two Amis.

 
Being restricted to 30mph makes it pretty useless for city dwellers, it would be highly dangerous on the north circular for example. Seems like it’s more a substitute for cycling/walking/scooters rather than for actual cars.
That’s an argument for reducing the speed limit on the North Circular, not against this car. 30mph is more than enough for cities.
 
That’s an argument for reducing the speed limit on the North Circular, not against this car.

Maybe when the speed limit on the north circular and all other urban dual carriageways and motorways is reduced to 30mph, this will be a viable alternative to larger cars. Until then it obviously isn’t.
 
Maybe when the speed limit on the north circular and all other urban dual carriageways and motorways is reduced to 30mph, this will be a viable alternative to larger cars. Until then it obviously isn’t.
Motorways have nothing to do with this car. It’s not allowed on them.

Almost no urban/city road should have a higher limit than 30. Most should be 20.
 
Why? Most cities have a max speed of 20mph and the average speed n central London is below that.

Take the Coventry ring road for example. As this car is incapable of traveling on it, it will instead have to ratrun through residential streets. It's not capable of reasonable city car journeys and will instead add to motorised traffic on quieter roads.
 
Try Peterborough or Milton Keynes etc, plenty of dual carriageway roads above 30mph that are part of direct routes from one part of town to another. Precisely to avoid cars going via residential areas, which this thing will have to do. Like a scooter but wider and heavier.
 
There’s a video somewhere of canyon reps plugging that vehicle, throughout they just throw shade on how shit uk transport infrastructure is. ‘It might not work in the uk, but in Europe which has proper bike lanes and better zoning it should work’.
 
Try Peterborough or Milton Keynes, plenty of dual carriageway roads above 30mph that are part of direct routes from one part of town to another. Precisely to avoid cars going via residential areas.
Both cities have plenty of areas with 20mph zones - with more likely on the way - and so fucking what if you have to go a bit slower?


And here's why we need more:

One of the first studies of pedestrian injury and car impact speed found that at 20mph there was a 2.5% chance of being fatally injured, compared to a 20% chance at 30mph, although this study is now regarded as having overestimated the risks. A recent review identified the studies which had produced the most reliable modern estimates4 . The results from one of these studies is presented in figure 1, which shows a fatality risk of 1.5% at 20 mph versus 8% at 30 mph

 
Both cities have plenty of areas with 20mph zones - with more likely on the way - and so fucking what if you have to go a bit slower?

.

These zones are residential areas, bordered by normal roads. They are meant to discourage rat running, so cars stick to the dual carriageways and ring roads etc.. These 30mph cars will have to find alternate routes on slow roads past schools etc, totally defeating the purpose.
 
Oh nos please don't change anything about motoring,

Don't close roads to cars, don't promote electric cars, smaller cars, fewer cars, less car ownership, no no. It's the natural order of things. Increasing gridlock, polution, time wasted, space wasted. If anything questions this paradign it't must be crushed in the cradle. We must defend our rights to choke on city pollution, get fatter, the inalienable right to impinge on public space with obstruction and noise.
 
Back
Top Bottom