shifting gears
Well-Known Member
Chuk off and die
Thanks - that made my day.Chuk off and die
The Tory boy fled the national conference before Corbyn's first speech as party leader.
That's the kind of loyalty you get from Chuka!
Big name Labour MPs 'escape before Corbyn speech'
The Tory boy fled the national conference before Corbyn's first speech as party leader.
That's the kind of loyalty you get from Chuka!
Big name Labour MPs 'escape before Corbyn speech'
I'm still having to google half of these 'big names'.
I'm still having to google half of these 'big names'.
Seems the man who could not run for leadership might be going it alone then?
Umunna supporters: “he’ll leave and start own party if CLP votes AMM”. No denial.
I've met Chukka and I've been on Kilroy (the Kray edition). There is no comparison I assure you!He's slowly mutating into Robert Kilroy-Silk.
The funny thing about this report is Squawkbox have funded Chuka constituency events in the past.Seems the man who could not run for leadership might be going it alone then?
Umunna supporters: “he’ll leave and start own party if CLP votes AMM”. No denial.
I've met Chukka and I've been on Kilroy (the Kray edition). There is no comparison I assure you!
((((CH1))))I've met Chukka and I've been on Kilroy (the Kray edition). There is no comparison I assure you!
I haven't had the joy of Chuka sitting next to me rubbing my thigh and ramming a microphone under the nose of someone on my other side.“Senator, I served with Kilroy-Silk. I knew Kilroy-Silk. Kilroy-Silk was a friend of mine. Senator, you're no Kilroy-Silk”.
Can you clarify please?((((CH1))))
It's nothing to do with the silly article you linked to. Parentheses have been used as a symbol for giving people hugs (on here at least) for yonks, so while far right plonkers might have appropriated it for their own uses, that's by the by.Can you clarify please?
(((Echoes))): beating the far-right, two triple-brackets at a time
i'm sorry, i made the mistake of thinking you were familiar with urban ways of showing sympathyCan you clarify please?
(((Echoes))): beating the far-right, two triple-brackets at a time
If you look at the election results for Streatham you can see that the Labour vote was declining slowly under Keith Hill but has been growing steadily since Chuka has been their candidate whilst Tory, LD and Green vote share hasI hope he goes for it. I want to see his face when he discovers what his personal vote actually is. That said I doubt he's actually quite stupid enough to think he can win against an official Labour candidate.
If you look at the election results for Streatham you can see that the Labour vote was declining slowly under Keith Hill but has been growing steadily since Chuka has been their candidate whilst Tory, LD and Green vote share has
been falling. I would lay a bet that the proportion of people voting for Chuka rather than Labour is fairly high. If he run as an independent or SDP 2.0 then I think there is a good chance he could win and he might very well think so too. It is however an unknown though like me he must just think this, he has no way of actually knowing without letting the masses have their say and the man can sit on the fence for Britain. Unless he thinks he is going to be deselected I doubt he will risk it.
If you look at the election results for Streatham you can see that the Labour vote was declining slowly under Keith Hill but has been growing steadily since Chuka has been their candidate whilst Tory, LD and Green vote share has
been falling. I would lay a bet that the proportion of people voting for Chuka rather than Labour is fairly high. If he run as an independent or SDP 2.0 then I think there is a good chance he could win and he might very well think so too. It is however an unknown though like me he must just think this, he has no way of actually knowing without letting the masses have their say and the man can sit on the fence for Britain. Unless he thinks he is going to be deselected I doubt he will risk it.
How is any of this anything like Chuka?
You might very well be right maybe Chuka worries about that possibility as well, we're both essentially offering an analysis based on limited facts and of course the only way we going to know is if Chuka puts his money where his mouth is.I'd take that bet no problem. The background to those increased majorities is that Labour has done similarly in most comparable seats across London - I don't think he's outperformed that pattern particularly. I'd say that's a sign of the increased strength of the party vote making it even harder for an individual to win off their personal vote, not a sign that he'd perform well as a Chuka Party candidate.
You are entitled to disagree with me but offer an opinion as to why you think so.This is laughably wrong.
You are entitled to disagree with me but offer an opinion as to why you think so.
"This is laughably wrong" is a meaningless statement.
Is this true? if we take the recent vote on All Member Meetings as an indication, it's pretty evenly split.now actively hated by the huge majority of his own CLP