neonwilderness
What would Badgers do?
Source?
Child in buggy blown on to London Tube station tracks
- Thread starter weltweit
- Start date
- Status
marty21
One on one? You're crazy.
he should have defended you against the hordes tbf
kittyP
Pluviophile
Er do you not remember the last thread where it all kicked off?
It was a guess, but most people know that most internet forums are almost entirely frequented by males.Source?
Also, there is no correct word in the English language to refer to someone whose gender is unknown. So the choice is either "he" or "she".
Sweet FA
✪ Three rounds Lord, in my .44 ✪
Bungle73, have you met Awesome Wells?
Last edited:
kittyP
Pluviophile
They?
Yes I noticed it too.
Some of the same people, in fact just diving in to play the man
MrSki
Who am I to say you're wrong
So is LUL a company or not?
neonwilderness
What would Badgers do?
Inserting "they" into what I wrote would have made it sound awkward. It's more natural, and automatic, to write he or she.
It's not a private company, in the same that the rail companies are, which is what I was getting at.
neonwilderness
What would Badgers do?
Not the ones I post on, and certainly not here
kittyP
Pluviophile
So when I whole group of people happen to disagree with someone / think they are acting like a twat / etc, it is bullying or playing someone?
Not just that they happen to agree with each other and are sick of the way someone acts? No?
There are quite a lot of people on here that make me
etc but I don't ever say anything narky to because they are nice people in the most (despite causing the above response in me). But some people are so consistently rude or contrary or belligerent or mind boggling in their responses that it's difficult not to get the hump with them.
MrSki
Who am I to say you're wrong
It is still a company and therefore can tow the company line.
kittyP
Pluviophile
They is more awkward than getting their gender wrong?
kittyP
Pluviophile
It doesn't make any difference. He was answering me and I was using "toe the company line" as a turn of phrase. Not making any comment on the status of TFL and LUL.
toggle
wobbly
so you make more sexist assumptions.
Yes I totally get that, however, several posters, their first post on this thread has had nothing to do with the OP or subject matter but rather is an insult or a "clever" put down of bungleSo when I whole group of people happen to disagree with someone / think they are acting like a twat / etc, it is bullying or playing someone?
Not just that they happen to agree with each other and are sick of the way someone acts? No?
There are quite a lot of people on here that make me
But some people are so consistently rude or contrary or belligerent or mind boggling in their responses that it's difficult not to get the hump with them.
toggle
wobbly
or perhaps admitting that he assumes that person with a buggy must be a stupid female and person with ability to use a computer must be male.
And funny how your original "sexism" accusation had nothing to do with how I referred to you, and now suddenly it's all about it.
You've clearly got a bee in your bonnet about this. But whatever, it isn't my problem.....
kittyP
Pluviophile
Because his responses are so damned predictable and infuriating.
Also Weltweit accused me and Toggle of doing "it". It was Bungle that started up with me and Toggle was doing nothing but pointing out why he was wrong.
Very selective reading there.
"Started up" with you? LOL! Rubbish. I made a simple comment in reply to your (ambiguous...and it was) post and now you're going apeshit over it.
toggle
wobbly
oh, do you believe I now unable to recognize your ability to make more than one sexist assumption? i can spell it out if you'd like.
you made an assumption that a person with a buggy must be female and another assumption that an internet forum user must be male. that's two seperate assumptions. both of which are sexist. only one of which was in any way about me, but I think is actually more about your general perspective on gender.
I would also like a source on that claim you've made on the gender of forum users.
kittyP
Pluviophile
I am not going apeshit over anything.
I am simply pointing out that I didn't start on you.
toggle
wobbly
oh kitty, your disagreed with him, didn't you realise that isn't allowed?
kittyP
Pluviophile
I didn't even do that, I just pointed out that he had misread my post, twice.
You appear to have bigger problems than anything I've said here.
You were pointing out how I "started" on you. When I did no such thing.
kittyP
Pluviophile
I said you "started up " with me, which you did.
I was saying all this in response to Weltweit and Alan who seemed to think it was people just having a dig at you, which I cleanly wasn't doing at the beginning.
Rather than read what I said, you read what you wanted to hear into what I said and jumped in to defend TFL, which is what you always seem to do in some way or another with transport stuff.
That's my point. Not that you "started on me". I am not fucking five.
Good stuff.
skyscraper101
0891 50 50 50
^this thread
- Status
