marty21
One on one? You're crazy.
made the comment before you looked at the article properly - proves my point about jumping to conclusion don't you think?
it isn't about 'toeing' the line , you just get arsey about stuff real quick
Child in buggy blown on to London Tube station tracks
- Thread starter weltweit
- Start date
- Status
it isn't about 'toeing' the line , you just get arsey about stuff real quick
Treacle Toes
Time
Fucking terrifying. 
Yes, some stations/platforms are windy BUT this was a freak accident. Buggies can feel like sturdy things and unless you leave it on a hill/slope and assume it will roll away, I doubt the average person would think..'Ah tube station, let me put the brakes on just in case of a massive gust of wind'... Now, maybe they will if they read/hear about this story.
Yes, some stations/platforms are windy BUT this was a freak accident. Buggies can feel like sturdy things and unless you leave it on a hill/slope and assume it will roll away, I doubt the average person would think..'Ah tube station, let me put the brakes on just in case of a massive gust of wind'... Now, maybe they will if they read/hear about this story.
kittyP
Pluviophile
Right back from your first posts on here.
"Um, why do TfL need to "take responsibility"? The stupid woman should have left the brakes on."
And then "Oh really! What does this say then"
You not only got the facts wrong but just assumed I was having a go a TFL, when I wasn't, and jumped in like the transport white knight to save the day.
Like you do every time. Without actually looking at what's really going on.
Orang Utan
Psychick Worrier Ov Geyoor
Bungle reminds me of:
(The most relevant bit is from 1:31)
(The most relevant bit is from 1:31)
I get "arsey" when people start trouble for no particular reason, and also when they jump on something I said like it was the worst thing ever, and try to make something out of nothing.
Proves what "point"? So tell me why that matters in the slightest? The fact is the brakes were not put on on (it's as plain as the nose on you face, otherwise why would it have rolled away? The wind isn't THAT strong).
So someone who through their own carelessness causes their child to end up an electrified railway track isn't stupid? I see.
And your post was ambiguous, which you would have realised if you weren't so keen on joining the others in putting the boot into me.
toggle
wobbly
by not aggreeing with your opinions?
by thinking there are things our public transport can and should do better?
by thinking there are some things that are done by train companies that are completely unreasonable?
that isn't starting trouble. getting really arsey with people who disagree with you could well be considered to be starting trouble. but the only person here doing that is you.
pushchairs should be banned from the tube to be fair
LOL! It's waste of time even trying to argue with as you are so far from the reality of what's gone on in this thread it isn't true.
MrSki
Who am I to say you're wrong
When you reply to the post about towing the company line with the above response, What does LUL stand for? Is it not "London Underground Limited"? Therefore it is a limited company so can tow the company line.
When you say "Stupid woman should have put the brakes on" not three posts earlier it was stated the chap... Do you not read what is said just have pre-prepared answers to anything transport related?
weltweit
Well-Known Member
Nightmare for the kid's parents, and had the mum not reacted so quickly another train might have arrived, then of course there was the risk of the electric rail.
I do think it is a bit odd this coming out so long after the event. If the kid was injured they probably would have turned up at an A&E the same day.
Is there some public safety message the publishers are trying to get out there? I don't imagine such events are very common.
I do think it is a bit odd this coming out so long after the event. If the kid was injured they probably would have turned up at an A&E the same day.
Is there some public safety message the publishers are trying to get out there? I don't imagine such events are very common.
This exactly what I am talking about.
Why the f are you making such a big fucking deal over whether I said it was the man or the woman? Why the fuck does it matter? It doesn't.
kittyP
Pluviophile
I said it before you even posted on this thread.
It wasn't ambiguous as you would have realised if you were not trying to be so quick to run to the defence of a transport network.
And I meant that you got it wrong as it was a bloke that was with the buggy wasn't it?
It was your assumption that it was a "stupid woman" who had done something wrong.
^^bellend
So?
Um, yes it was; and that fact that you are now trying to argue that it wasn't only further proves my point.
For about the millionth time, so bloody what. Why the fuck does it matter in the slightest whether I said it was a man or a woman? This is exactly what I said about making a huge deal out of fucking nothing.
toggle
wobbly
you get arsey because people disagree with you or disagree with some transport company policy, start gobbing off left, right and center, refuse to consider that any opinion other than yours could have any potential merit. then when people don't respond to your demands to agree with you, then we get accusation that disagreement is some form of offense.
it's not just this thread, but a pattern you repeat on every thread on transport that I've seen you comment on.
bubblesmcgrath
Well-Known Member
Is the child ok? Hope so.
MrSki
Who am I to say you're wrong
Because not only could you not be bothered to watch the video before expressing an opinion, you could not even be bothered to read the thread. It just comes across as a bit arrogant that is all.
You know, making up a bunch of blatant lies makes it look like you're bell end here.
Orang Utan
Psychick Worrier Ov Geyoor
So, people with babies and toddlers should not use it?
kittyP
Pluviophile
How can I have been trying to put the boot in if I posted first?
Oh FFS
It proves nothing. I know what my intention was, I think the fact that you don't realise why your assumptions and wording speaks volumes, well, speaks volumes
MrSki
Who am I to say you're wrong
In your opinion but I doubt that yet again many others agree with you.
kittyP
Pluviophile
But Toggle is not lying at all.
Once again, everyone else can see something you can't.
Why is that?
Tell me how watching the video would have changed ANYTHING that I said?? I already knew what happened because it was stated in the OP. Nothing in the actual article, or the video, tells us anything useful that wasn't stated there.
How is it being "arrogant" to sate the bleeding obvious - that whoever was in charge of the pushchair was careless.
toggle
wobbly
weltweit
Well-Known Member
I can't see it.
I can see a few people having a go at bungle.
As they have done before.
I saw it recently with someone else in another thread.
It isn't attractive.
Sexism? LOL" You are a fucking joke. You and you fucking lies. Fuck off.
MrSki
Who am I to say you're wrong
If you had watched the video you would have seen it was a man. If you had read the thread you would have read that he was referred to as a chap & not a chapess.
neonwilderness
What would Badgers do?
If you'd watched the video first you might have realised that it wasn't the "stupid woman" who didn't put the brakes on
WHY
THE
FUCK
DOES
IT
MATTER
?????????????????????????????
Big deal out of nothing - just like I keep saying.
- Status
