weltweit
Well-Known Member
Well spotted, I didn't notice that... So urgent they waited more than a fortnight to release the footage?? Aye, right!
Why are they now, so much later releasing it?
Well spotted, I didn't notice that... So urgent they waited more than a fortnight to release the footage?? Aye, right!
after editing no doubtWell spotted, I didn't notice that.
Why are they now, so much later releasing it?
Editing it for what? You can see everything.after editing no doubt
for releaseEditing it for what? You can see everything.
Bungle73
Dont one you think there should be some kind of automatic, self-lowering barrier at the edge of the platform to prevent this? I think that's where the whole responsibility issue comes in. Also, a few attendants on every platform to look out for this kind of thing.
Me too.When I read the thread I assumed that the buggy was next to the track. Effing hell.
as we had under BR
The lovely jubbly line has glass windows with sliding doors so you can't access the track at all.Bungle73
Dont one you think there should be some kind of automatic, self-lowering barrier at the edge of the platform to prevent this? I think that's where the whole responsibility issue comes in. Also, a few attendants on every platform to look out for this kind of thing.
Me too.
It was nowhere near the edge.
The lovely jubbly line has glass windows with sliding doors so you can't access the track at all.
Which line is that? - I have been on it but can't rememberThe lovely jubbly line has glass windows with sliding doors so you can't access the track at all.
It's not practical. And where would the money come from for these "attendants"? Anyway, this sort of thing hardly ever happens. There are very, very few accidents on the Tube.Bungle73
Dont one you think there should be some kind of automatic, self-lowering barrier at the edge of the platform to prevent this? I think that's where the whole responsibility issue comes in. Also, a few attendants on every platform to look out for this kind of thing.
That's not what they're there for. They're for airflow reasons.The lovely jubbly line has glass windows with sliding doors so you can't access the track at all.
Which line is that? - I have been on it but can't remember
after editing no doubt
It's not practical. And where would the money come from for these "attendants"? Anyway, this sort of thing hardly ever happens. There are very, very few accidents on the Tube.
That's not what they're there for. They're for airflow reasons.
The first time I heard it was over the intercom from a tube driver.Lovely jubbly line.
Never heard that before.
The Jubilee lineWhich line is that? - I have been on it but can't remember
I don't know why they were put there but they do stop you accessing the tracks.It's not practical. And where would the money come from for these "attendants"? Anyway, this sort of thing hardly ever happens. There are very, very few accidents on the Tube.
That's not what they're there for. They're for airflow reasons.
Save lives? What lives? When was the last time someone was killed by accidentally ending up onto the Tube tracks? I can't recall it ever happening. And as I said it isn't practical. I'm not sure where I said it couldn't be afforded.I knew you'd say that. They can tunnel through the middle of London but they can't afford a few barriers? Rubbish. It would save lives.
Save lives? What lives? When was the last time someone was killed by accidentally ending up onto the Tube tracks? I can't recall it ever happening. And as I said it isn't practical. I'm not sure where I said it couldn't be afforded.
Only on the extension. The rest of is the same as the rest of the Tube.I don't know why they were put there but they do stop you accessing the tracks.
Yeah I know.Only on the extension. The rest of is the same as the rest of the Tube.
Um, you didn't say attendants, you said barriers. 7 "accidental deaths from wind gusts"? Source?You asked where the money would come from for the attendants! I think if you check the figures for 2010/11 you'll see there were 7 accidental deaths from platform gusts.
Um, you didn't say attendants, you said barriers. 7 "accidental deaths from wind gusts"? Source?
Oh don't worry.I also said attendants. But I stand by the barriers too. Well, you know what I mean. Behind them.
If we agree that there were deaths and that barriers/ attendants would help and you're saying that money is no object then what's the problem?