Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

car porn

Anyone watching for the love of cars on 4? Restoring an Aston DBS....Aston are soooo cute/cool/hot....wow. they showed lord brett sinclairs car! Errmmmmm
 
Did not like the interior, though on the plus side, the most expensive DBS ever, yet they will be barred fro the aston owners club for that digression :D
 
The Barkas van, East Germany's answer to the VW camper van of hippydom fame:

WP_20150422_09_45_34_Pro1_zpsfitui4oo.jpg
 
All muscle cars are terrible cars. That's just an unfortunate car fact. Here's a 1953 Salmson 2300S to cleanse the palate.

2407451917_0a1b9d2581.jpg
 
A friend of mine has one of them - stll haven't been in it though - he only drives it about in the summer -keeps it garaged up the rest of the year

I'm not surprised: good ones are worth a fair bit these days. I think the DS is a gorgeous-looking car, and it was way ahead of its time when it came out. Mind you, I've a sneaking affection for its successor too, the big Citroen CX:

citroen_cx25_gti_turbo_5.jpg


Citroens were great before they went all convenional and dull.
 
Almost all old cars are terrible. The appeal of "classics" is lost on me.

I think muscles cars of that era are objectively bad compared to what else was available as they were usually horribly underbraked and underdamped. eg compare that Charger to a BMW 3.0CS or Fiat 2400 of the same period.
 
I think muscles cars of that era are objectively bad compared to what else was available as they were usually horribly underbraked and underdamped. eg compare that Charger to a BMW 3.0CS or Fiat 2400 of the same period.
Oh yeah, they were particularly horrible. But anything from that era will be shit compared to whats available now. And in a crash you'll die.

Just don't see the appeal. Why would you want anything other than the best of what's available? I see the argument for the styling, so look to the companies that rip out all the shit bits and put modern brakes and suspension in. Then they might be nice.
 
This for example - all the beauty of the E-Type, but with everything bad about it (engine, brakes, suspension) done properly.

http://www.eaglegb.com/pages/eagle-speedster#.VWl5YmBH3_Q

Slight problem with Eagle is that you're looking at over £600k for all the options.

I reckon I'd go for a nice 70s XJS, and get KWE to overhaul it. They seem like an absolute bargain in comparison:

"Depending on the broad specification, lead time is about 20 weeks. A base price of around £90,000 + vat. Depending largely on engine choices this could rise to £130k + vat. The primary choice is 6 or 12 cylinders, supercharged or normally aspirated. So far, no one has ordered a supercharged V12 so we cannot be precise about costs, but it would certainly add around £30k to the base price and possibly a further 20 weeks. Another option for maximum power is to fit a 7 litre V12 Lister Jaguarengine which is normally aspirated but achieves around 500bhp. This in turn will need some body modifications to fit large enough wheels and tyres to handle the power. "
 
I think muscles cars of that era are objectively bad compared to what else was available as they were usually horribly underbraked and underdamped. eg compare that Charger to a BMW 3.0CS or Fiat 2400 of the same period.


Also the RMS Titanic had better steering and when round corners than American muscle cars
 
Also the RMS Titanic had better steering and when round corners than American muscle cars

It wouldn't have sunk if it had been an american muscle car. It wouldn't have turned and received the fatal gash in the side. It would have just hit the berg straight on and bashed the front. It would have stayed afloat.
 
Back
Top Bottom