cuppa tee
Well-Known Member
One of Brixton's biggest property developers wrote to me yesterday to tell me that Brixton Greens defamatory claims about me "were all over town,"
.....he must frequent different parts of town to me
One of Brixton's biggest property developers wrote to me yesterday to tell me that Brixton Greens defamatory claims about me "were all over town,"
One of Brixton's biggest property developers wrote to me yesterday to tell me that Brixton Greens defamatory claims about me "were all over town," adding that he believed that there was "no smoke without fire."
Given the untrue and damaging nature of the allegations - and the amount of time they were left online before they vanished without explanation - the onus is now very much on Brixton Green to make sufficient redress in this matter, and in a timely manner.
Having checked back through various BB articles I see that you did describe them as "trousering up funds". Perhaps that is what they were unhappy about?The allegation that I have spent money to "discredit" them, plus the claim that I alleged they "pocketed" money are nothing but Brixton Green lies.
The problem is if it gets legal. I was threatened with being sued for libel by the previous owners of the Dogstar many years ago, and had no alternative but to issue a grovelling apology and undertaking (not wishing to lose my house).I sincerely hope you have the wherewithal to give them a proper shafting.
You should have plenty of evidence, and I don't approve of bullying.
Maybe he does, but a LOT of people are aware of the dodgy claims they published. I've had no end of people ask me about it......he must frequent different parts of town to me
They made some quite serous allegations about me in an official statement, including the claim that I entered No 6 Somerleyton Road with a mob of people, caused a disturbance and disrupted a community youth project, resulting in the young people having to be sent home "for their own safety".The problem is if it gets legal. I was threatened with being sued for libel by the previous owners of the Dogstar many years ago, and had no alternative but to issue a grovelling apology and undertaking (not wishing to lose my house).
My advice would be to seek to resolve this situation amicably if at all possible. The complainant has apparently not threatened legal action here, but is applying psychological pressure by making allegations in revenge for their slight (as they perceive it).
Cool it I think. People have to co-exist. Doesn't mean they have to agree with each other, or how they make their living. Making further counter allegations is going to simply escalate the situation.
Excuse my passive aggressive sermon.
I reckon they could - and should - accept that their allegations are wholly untrue. Asking them to confess to lying might stick in their craw.They made some quite serous allegations about me in an official statement, including the claim that I entered No 6 Somerleyton Road with a mob of people, caused a disturbance and disrupted a community youth project, resulting in the young people having to be sent home "for their own safety".
Those allegations were wholly untrue and just removing them without explanation is not good enough. I want them to make it crystal clear that they made the story up.
There's no other way to word it, I'm afraid. I was nowhere near the building when this supposed disturbance took place.I reckon they could - and should - accept that their allegations are wholly untrue. Asking them to confess to lying might stick in their craw.
One of Brixton's biggest property developers wrote to me yesterday to tell me that Brixton Greens defamatory claims about me "were all over town," adding that he believed that there was "no smoke without fire."
Given the untrue and damaging nature of the allegations - and the amount of time they were left online before they vanished without explanation - the onus is now very much on Brixton Green to make sufficient redress in this matter, and in a timely manner.
Having checked back through various BB articles I see that you did describe them as "trousering up funds". Perhaps that is what they were unhappy about?
Having checked back through various BB articles I see that you did describe them as "trousering up funds". Perhaps that is what they were unhappy about?
The problem is if it gets legal. I was threatened with being sued for libel by the previous owners of the Dogstar many years ago, and had no alternative but to issue a grovelling apology and undertaking (not wishing to lose my house).
My advice would be to seek to resolve this situation amicably if at all possible. The complainant has apparently not threatened legal action here, but is applying psychological pressure by making allegations in revenge for their slight (as they perceive it).
Cool it I think. People have to co-exist. Doesn't mean they have to agree with each other, or how they make their living. Making further counter allegations is going to simply escalate the situation.
Excuse my passive aggressive sermon.
There's no other way to word it, I'm afraid. I was nowhere near the building when this supposed disturbance took place.
Was this on a page with a link like "Brixton Green's statement" on the RH side of their website?Here's what the mysterious Brixton Green claim:
"Jason Cobb has also made accusations that Brixton Green has been "pocketing" money from Lambeth Council."
This is completely untrue.
Plus also the Brixton Green lie that I have been spending money to discredit them - something that Brixton Green has fabricated.
Maybe he does, but a LOT of people are aware of the dodgy claims they published. I've had no end of people ask me about it.
https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/trouser#Verb
To "trouser funds" has connotations of misappropriation to me.
I reckon they could - and should - accept that their allegations are wholly untrue. Asking them to confess to lying might stick in their craw.
https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/trouser#Verb
To "trouser funds" has connotations of misappropriation to me.
Where have I said that Brixton Green has "pocketed" - or even trousered - money from Lambeth Council? This is the claim that has been made against me.
Was this on a page with a link like "Brixton Green's statement" on the RH side of their website?
If so I tried 2 different ways of retrieving that and the link is no longer available either for 1st July or 29th June.
Which suggests they have either realised, or been legally advised that they have been defamatory and it has been well and truly taken down.
Where have I said that Brixton Green has "pocketed" - or even trousered - money from Lambeth Council? This is the claim that has been made against me.
Add to that a partisan management of the boards and it's no surprise most local politicians stay well clear.
I don't know if it would be possible to construct such a thing. Urban75 isn't it, anyway.
In his previous cabinet portfolio Cllr Jack had to sort out stormy ructions at the Community/Police Consultative Group which he actually seemed to handle quite well. What a pity Boris then conceived the brilliant idea of abolishing police community consultation after 30 years in Lambeth (presumably it was inefficient and costly).Thanks for putting this up. Take it thats its in todays edition.
Interesting Jacko says that Council has "ongoing dialogue with those involved".. "and want to ensure tensions are resolved"
In his previous cabinet portfolio Cllr Jack had to sort out stormy ructions at the Community/Police Consultative Group which he actually seemed to handle quite well. What a pity Boris then conceived the brilliant idea of abolishing police community consultation after 30 years in Lambeth (presumably it was inefficient and costly).
Which suggests they have either realised, or been legally advised that they have been defamatory and it has been well and truly taken down.
.....he must frequent different parts of town to me
I managed to retrieve the original statement using Google cache. It seems pretty much the same as was posted up in 8 sections here in this thread on 25th June by a new user from Brixton Green apparently.As editor says after complaints from him it suddenly disappeared.
I guess the more sensible elements in BG saw the statement was a load of rather nasty bollox. Its got Brad all over it.
I wonder if everyone on the board of BG was even consulted about it.
The way its written show ineptitude. A short to the point non personalized statement would have worked better in PR terms. Still its an amusing read in hindsight. Not so funny for the editor