Gramsci
Well-Known Member
The Casey report has section on stop and search. Page 322 conclusion says:
The several pages in report on this lead to conclusion that harm done by stop and search is not outweighed by any decrease in serious crime .
It causes significant lack of trust in police by younger black people.
In short Id say , after reading this section of report,it's an example of how institutionalised racism operates
The section 60 is most extreme version of stop and search as no reason has to be given.
Its use in this case of murder is of course aimed at one section of Lambeth population. Middle aged white men aren't going to be affected. If they were then response to it might be different.
It's not , looking at the evidence, going to catch the murderer.
Stop and search is currently deployed by the Met at the cost of legitimacy, trust and, therefore consent. To date, the Met has been unable to explain clearly enough why its use is justified on the scale it uses it, and in the manner and way it is carried out, particularly on Black Londoners. It has damaged trust. If the Met is unable to explain and justify its disproportionate use and the impacts of these, then it needs a fundamental reset.
The several pages in report on this lead to conclusion that harm done by stop and search is not outweighed by any decrease in serious crime .
It causes significant lack of trust in police by younger black people.
In short Id say , after reading this section of report,it's an example of how institutionalised racism operates
The section 60 is most extreme version of stop and search as no reason has to be given.
Its use in this case of murder is of course aimed at one section of Lambeth population. Middle aged white men aren't going to be affected. If they were then response to it might be different.
It's not , looking at the evidence, going to catch the murderer.