Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Brixton Liveable Neighbourhood and LTN schemes - improvements for pedestrians and cyclists

Is there a reason for why suspending the Streatham Wells LTN would make the traffic down New Park Road (from Brixton Hill to the south circular) a nightmare again? :hmm:
Can’t think of a straightforward explanation but by removing the SW LTN we have just massively increased capacity in the area so that will encourage people to drive that were put off from driving due to congestion on the A23.
 
I think the poor weather we have been having recently i
This is excellent and explains the issues very well. Basically, any exit from the LTN on the narrow section of the high street needs to either be traffic light controlled, or blocked off entirely.
Agree with this. The extra large yellow box junctions on that southbound bit of SHR have the unintended consequence of giving traffic coming out of SW priority over buses.

The design of the LTN with LCR basically free flowing and SHR being the main way in/out seems a bit flawed.
 
I'm referring to junctions with Sunnyhill road/Shrubbery road which come just before the nice clear bus lane bit starts
 
I was sent this by a neighbour.


Lambeth Council has been a shambles throughout. Their “consultation” was a joke, their communications appalling and the implementation cack-handed. From installing LTN signs facing in the wrong direction, to suspending the scheme but leaving road-blocking LTN infrastructure in place, officials and councillors have proved inept.

One thing though seems sure: the whole debacle has made the task of getting people to ditch their cars much, much harder.

It's quite refreshing to see someone else agree with me, and to have put it more articulately as well.
 
Although she incorrectly states that there is a distributor road through the middle of it and that Streatham Wells has poor public transport links.
It's all relative, isn't it? Compared to where I grew up, the transport in Streatham Wells is amazing. But compared to most parts of Lambeth, it isn't great.

I definitely think that the council should have done something to improve bus services in the area before going live with the LTN. In fact, I still think they should do this, regardless of their previous position that it is TfL's responsibility alone. It is the buses which have brought the LTN down. You can inconvenience cars all you like, as long as people have public transport options, especially in the winter.
 
It's all relative, isn't it? Compared to where I grew up, the transport in Streatham Wells is amazing. But compared to most parts of Lambeth, it isn't great.
Is that really true? Here's a map of bus routes in S London. The density in the Streatham Wells area doesn't look particularly unusual for south London.

Screenshot 2024-03-14 at 18.58.38.jpg

And it's surrounded by several rail stations too.

Screenshot 2024-03-14 at 19.01.59.jpg
 
The council doesn't run the buses.
I know that, but surely there must be some communication between Lambeth and TfL to tell them that they are going to implement an LTN and there's a chance that the likes of the 315 won't be sufficient for the Valley Road area, or the P13 for the ABC roads.

It would be great if the LTNs could be used as a catalyst for more frequent buses, and buses with more capacity.

As I have banged my drum here repeatedly, the fact that the only bus between Tulse Hill station and Streatham High Road is the P13, which is a short wheelbase single decker and is timetabled every 20 minutes, is ridiculous. Surely the implementation of LTN in the ABC roads would increase demand on that very route, yet no improvements were made.

Sometimes I feel that an inadequate bus route ends up driving people away, and then poor passenger numbers are claimed to show a lack of demand. I am sure that if a 68 bus terminated at Streatham instead of West Norwood, taking in Christchurch Road and Streatham High Road, that stretch would be at capacity immediately. Is it something to do with an internal boundary between West Norwood and Brixton Hill garages, two different zones?
 
Last edited:
I imagine that the reality is TfL don't want to invest lots of scarce resources redesigning bus routes in an area that's about to have an LTN trial conducted, one where the street design might get altered several times or (as we have seen in Streatham Wells) abandoned or suspended. Once a scheme (and associated traffic patterns) beds in, I'd guess they'd then be more likely to look at adjusting routing and frequency.

Yup it's not ideal. Ideally it would all happen in a joined up and harmonious way. But it's like lots of things to do with LTNs - the realistic options are doing it in a slightly shambolic and under resourced way vs. not doing it at all.

While of course public transport could be better in SW I don't think it's so bad that you can make some kind of argument that you are asking car users to endure such intolerable conditions using public transport that it's not reasonable to make their car use a bit less convenient. Millions of residents of London rely on public transport of a similar kind of quality every day, and have no alternative.

The more people that are reliant on public transport the better the provision is and the better it gets funded. London itself as a whole (relative to the rest of the UK) is a demonstration of this.

Why are TfL currently short of funds? Because central govt, driven by the interests of the UK's car dependent majority are refusing to help cover the revenue black hole that happened during covid.
 
TfL also did a bit of cutting of bus frequency a year or so ago, including Streatham so the idea they'd add more in any meaningful way in any LTN area in Streatham is for the birds
 
I don’t know if it’s coincidence but I’ve seen/been in a lot more traffic in surrounding areas since the stopping of the SW LTN.

When is NPR actually meant to become a school road? I know it was planned but I can’t find any record of it now, and it’s remarkable how they’ve prioritised a whole load of schools on quiet roads but that NPR has no traffic restriction around its school and has been made a LTN through road. That road is really making me hate cars/drivers atm. :mad:
 
I don’t know if it’s coincidence but I’ve seen/been in a lot more traffic in surrounding areas since the stopping of the SW LTN.

When is NPR actually meant to become a school road? I know it was planned but I can’t find any record of it now, and it’s remarkable how they’ve prioritised a whole load of schools on quiet roads but that NPR has no traffic restriction around its school and has been made a LTN through road. That road is really making me hate cars/drivers atm. :mad:
Was it ever going to be? Can’t see a Richard Atkins on the list and presumably TfL wouldn’t allow NPR to be closed for a school street the same reasons it didn’t allow it for the local LTN.

 
Was it ever going to be? Can’t see a Richard Atkins on the list and presumably TfL wouldn’t allow NPR to be closed for a school street the same reasons it didn’t allow it for the local LTN.

It WAS definitely on a list of planned school streets, I’ve seen it on a list and the fact that it’s not easily findable now makes me highly suspicious. If it doesn’t become a school street or even get the zebra crossing it so direly needs then that’s a dick move. If school streets are only implemented on roads that are already relatively quiet then what’s the bloody point of them?

It is so dangerous and has just got worse since SW reopened, and about 4 out of 5 drivers are unwilling in slow moving/constant traffic to pause to let kids cross. Not to mention the vans and trucks moving around carelessly and parking where they shouldn’t on the road intersecting with the HiH on the corner. I hate them all. Particularly the dickhead who shouted abuse at me for daring to cycle with my 9 year old down it. :mad::mad:
 
It WAS definitely on a list of planned school streets, I’ve seen it on a list and the fact that it’s not easily findable now makes me highly suspicious. If it doesn’t become a school street or even get the zebra crossing it so direly needs then that’s a dick move. If school streets are only implemented on roads that are already relatively quiet then what’s the bloody point of them?

It is so dangerous and has just got worse since SW reopened, and about 4 out of 5 drivers are unwilling in slow moving/constant traffic to pause to let kids cross. Not to mention the vans and trucks moving around carelessly and parking where they shouldn’t on the road intersecting with the HiH on the corner. I hate them all. Particularly the dickhead who shouted abuse at me for daring to cycle with my 9 year old down it. :mad::mad:
Yes, New Park Road seemed to get some coloured dots and a bit of a chicane to help with traffic at the school, rather than any solid traffic measure.

School street are less direct than protecting a school entrance. If you look at Hitherfield School, the kids enter on Leigham Vale, but that is not where the school street is. Same with Julians, Kids enter on Leigham Court Road, school streets are Springwell and Etherstone. The intention is to stop people driving there rather than block traffic at the entrance itself. Does the Brixton Hill perform a similar function for Richard Atkins?

I’ve always thought that in LTN design, and parklets, school streets, all the roads strategy, that having Leigham Vale as no through road to vehicles and a wide, flat area with benches and trees outside the school entrance would make most sense.
 
Once a scheme (and associated traffic patterns) beds in, I'd guess they'd then be more likely to look at adjusting routing and frequency.
I would again, raise the P13 since the Streatham Hill LTN went live.

The Streatham Hill LTN aims to stop traffic through the ABC roads in both directions between Tulse Hill and Streatham Hill.

The P13 takes exactly that route. Less private cars gives people an opportunity to get onto the bus.

The bus frequency wasn’t changed, the bus type wasn’t changed. And this is well over three years later. As a result, motorist either drive to Streatham, if necessary, or else just drive somewhere else, without an LTN restriction, to do the same thing.

If TfL is tight with resources then they need to become more innovative, ensure they are getting value for their money, rather than just do what they’ve always done and claim they can’t do any more.
 
The P13 takes exactly that route. Less private cars gives people an opportunity to get onto the bus.

The bus frequency wasn’t changed, the bus type wasn’t changed. And this is well over three years later. As a result, motorist either drive to Streatham, if necessary, or else just drive somewhere else, without an LTN restriction, to do the same thing.
Anecdotally a lot of people in Streatham hill gave up on driving to Streatham because of the traffic and now drive to Brixton instead (e.g. Acre lane Tesco) or West Norwood.

Ironic that the traffic is being displaced further away and journeys becoming longer.

I know a lot of people are reliant on P13 and it could definitely be improved
 
Yes, New Park Road seemed to get some coloured dots and a bit of a chicane to help with traffic at the school, rather than any solid traffic measure.
There was a consultation on filtering NPR in 2015 but they stopped short as there were too many objections. The dots and chicanes are just shit. This is why the council shouldn't just listen to people responding to consultations.

 
the only bus between Tulse Hill station and Streatham High Road is the P13, which is a short wheelbase single decker and is timetabled every 20 minutes, is ridiculous.

By the way it looks to me like the P13 is every 15 minutes (it was increased from 3ph to 4ph in 2014).

Is it frequently full to standing?

If TfL is tight with resources then they need to become more innovative, ensure they are getting value for their money, rather than just do what they’ve always done and claim they can’t do any more.

They've already had to make various cuts, remember the consultation a year or so ago about which bus routes to cut back? They are currently making savings by cutting back on maintenance which is not sustainable in the long term and I'd say it's already visible on the tube. There may be options available to them to raise more funding from within London, possibly via council tax or business rates, although I'm not sure how feasible that is. There is also talk of raising money via road pricing (which I'd support) which no doubt will raise a lot of complaints if/when it happens. I think I'm right in saying that unlike the res of the UK, the maintenance of the trunk road network in London is not paid for directlly by central government but by TfL - arguably this means public transport users, through fares, subsidise the road network for private motorists. So road pricing would be entirely justified.
 
There was a consultation on filtering NPR in 2015 but they stopped short as there were too many objections. The dots and chicanes are just shit. This is why the council shouldn't just listen to people responding to consultations.

It was considered as part of the LTN design but TFL vetoed it because it would cause delays at the S Circular A23 junction I think?
 
Why do anti-LTN accounts just produce outright lies?

All of the filters in Ferndale use ANPR cameras which the emergency services are allowed to drive through. And always have been.



Ferndale is actually a perfect example. The only physical filter in the area is part of the estate - when that was built it was done so that there was no through traffic.
Screenshot 2024-03-18 at 11.14.55.pngScreenshot 2024-03-18 at 11.15.46.png
 
Brixton Hill monitoring report published.

 
Back
Top Bottom