Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Brixton Liveable Neighbourhood and LTN schemes - improvements for pedestrians and cyclists

The fact that something is quicker in the car, at a quiet time of day, does not necessarily mean that the public transport option is "poor".

And the context of this is the argument you hear so often, that well I'm not against LTNs but you know we really have to do other stuff first like making the public transport better. That might hold up in some places, places where there really aren't viable alternatives so you can't expect any significant transfer to other transport modes as a result of making the car option less convenient. But for the most part zone 3&4 London really isn't one of those places.

l
Agreed, although it is worth saying that public transport between South West and South East London really could be much improved.
This really doesn’t address anything I’ve said. I’m visiting family and the journey takes 40 minutes there and 25 minutes back. If I took public transport it would be 1 hour 10-15 minutes each way. It would make my daughter visiting her grandparents impossible. And I’m travelling to Bromley, a neighbouring borough, not going right across London. The journey could clearly take far less time on public transport of it was improved. You won’t win people over with a “suck it up attitude”.
Why would it make it impossible? People without cars do still see family members/visit less accessible places, it just takes longer. But if you haven’t got/don’t tend to use a car you just factor it in as your normal.
 
Agreed, although it is worth saying that public transport between South West and South East London really could be much improved.

Why would it make it impossible? People without cars do still see family members/visit less accessible places, it just takes longer. But if you haven’t got/don’t tend to use a car you just factor it in as your normal.

For me? Because the time it took to get there and back would mean I would get so little time there in the evening that it would be pointless. A combined 2 hour 30 minute journey time with my daughter, for less than an hour visit. If my relatives lived in another town I would say fair enough, but they are in a neighbouring borough.
 
If there were more direct routes from place to place then it would make journeys quicker.

I'm not sure what the issue is here. Clearly public transport can't be tailored to everyone's specific direct journey. There have always been journeys that are easier by car. No one is stopping you driving this journey - not LTNs, not ULEZ and not teuchter. So what's your point?
 
For me? Because the time it took to get there and back would mean I would get so little time there in the evening that it would be pointless. A combined 2 hour 30 minute journey time with my daughter, for less than an hour visit. If my relatives lived in another town I would say fair enough, but they are in a neighbouring borough.
Streatham and Bromley aren't 'really' neighbouring boroughs though are they? Bromley is huge and you need to go through Croydon, Lewisham or Southwark to get there from Lambeth.

What about someone who doesn't have a car and has to make your journey on public transport? Do they just give up?
 
For me? Because the time it took to get there and back would mean I would get so little time there in the evening that it would be pointless. A combined 2 hour 30 minute journey time with my daughter, for less than an hour visit. If my relatives lived in another town I would say fair enough, but they are in a neighbouring borough.
So you do what people with parents/grandparents in other towns/those without cars do, and schedule visits at different times of the week than weekday evenings. Having to do things slightly differently doesn’t mean not doing them at all.

As I said earlier, it’s different if you’ve got caring responsibilities for an older relative and need to do daily journeys. However, less cars on the road makes it easier for those people to do those journeys, along with those who driving then and there is essential.
 
I'm not sure what the issue is here. Clearly public transport can't be tailored to everyone's specific direct journey. There have always been journeys that are easier by car. No one is stopping you driving this journey - not LTNs, not ULEZ and not teuchter. So what's your point?
Yes good point. We’re quibbling a bit but presumably unless you drive like a twat, using the car at a quiet time of day is not the major issue here. Nor will LTNs inconvenience you as much if you have to go slightly further in quiet traffic.

It’s still a relative privilege having the choice in the first place.
 
I’m still slightly aghast by a woman on SMN going on about how she absolutely needed a car for the school/nursery/work journey, which was something we had been doing in various forms by public transport for years!
 
There is a little minibus that zooms around in the morning on weekdays, usually empty. It drives at high speed through the LTN filters. It has a Lambeth badge.

Some sort of on demand service connected to the schools maybe?

I guess when you're council owned there's no danger in getting a fine. :D
I suspect the buses you are referring to are ones that take children to specialist educational provision, and given the children will have various mobility issues between them it’s fair enough for them to be exempt from LTNs. Though again that’s not an excuse for speeding/driving like a twat if they are doing so.
 
I'm not sure what the issue is here. Clearly public transport can't be tailored to everyone's specific direct journey. There have always been journeys that are easier by car. No one is stopping you driving this journey - not LTNs, not ULEZ and not teuchter. So what's your point?

To be honest things have gone off on a tangent. My issue with the LTN is the big increase in a bus commute.
 
Streatham and Bromley aren't 'really' neighbouring boroughs though are they? Bromley is huge and you need to go through Croydon, Lewisham or Southwark to get there from Lambeth.

What about someone who doesn't have a car and has to make your journey on public transport? Do they just give up?

No you don’t it neighbours Lambeth
Streatham and Bromley aren't 'really' neighbouring boroughs though are they? Bromley is huge and you need to go through Croydon, Lewisham or Southwark to get there from Lambeth.

What about someone who doesn't have a car and has to make your journey on public transport? Do they just give up?

Crystal Palace borders Bromley and is very close to Streatham common. It does neighbour the borough.

Someone who doesn’t have a car has a far more difficult time and probably won’t be able to see their family nearly so much. Again surely rather than “suck it up” we should be arguing for better public transport.
 
So you do what people with parents/grandparents in other towns/those without cars do, and schedule visits at different times of the week than weekday evenings. Having to do things slightly differently doesn’t mean not doing them at all.

As I said earlier, it’s different if you’ve got caring responsibilities for an older relative and need to do daily journeys. However, less cars on the road makes it easier for those people to do those journeys, along with those who driving then and there is essential.

Yes you can do things differently but having poor public transport links does mean people miss out on family time. Again rather than saying tough shit get on with it, I think public transport between SE and SW London could be much improved.

And yes I agree I want far less cars on the road. I want better public transport, I want enforcement measures, I want a collective state zip car organisation. But I don’t want an LTN that adds big commute times to buses. And obviously given that’s affected me a lot I will comment on it.
 
Yes you can do things differently but having poor public transport links does mean people miss out on family time. Again rather than saying tough shit get on with it, I think public transport between SE and SW London could be much improved.

And yes I agree I want far less cars on the road. I want better public transport, I want enforcement measures, I want a collective state zip car organisation. But I don’t want an LTN that adds big commute times to buses. And obviously given that’s affected me a lot I will comment on it.
And tbf I said exactly that about SW and SE London. But there’s also quite a gulf of meaning between “you might need to consider doing things slightly differently” and “tough get on with it”. Certainly there are different environmental and population circumstances currently compared to the hey day of the car, and different environmental understandings. Something needs to change and a little extra inconvenience for a large group of relatively privileged people, with exceptions for those who are more marginalised (such as those with mobility difficulties) is a better outcome than many others.
 
And tbf I said exactly that about SW and SE London. But there’s also quite a gulf of meaning between “you might need to consider doing things slightly differently” and “tough get on with it”. Certainly there are different environmental and population circumstances currently compared to the hey day of the car, and different environmental understandings. Something needs to change and a little extra inconvenience for a large group of relatively privileged people, with exceptions for those who are more marginalised (such as those with mobility difficulties) is a better outcome than many others.

I don’t disagree with that to be honest.

As an aside no idea what’s happened today but it was hell. The 118 route is entirely blocked. Greyhound Lane and Streatham high street. The road coming down Streatham common north is also at a stand still. It can’t go on like this.

I left loads of time for a blood test at Gracefield Gardens but will need to rebook.
 
Yeah I got the bus to work for the first time in ages (going the other way towards Brixton) and both the amount of full buses flying past without stopping and the traffic were noticeably bad. Not quite sure why I did really- I usually cycle but it’s a work do tonight so chose public transport on autopilot, but as I’m not drinking I could have completely used my bike!
 
Train strikes today which won’t help.

We are being told it needs time to bed in which may be the case but it’s not great at the moment.

Unless crippling rush hour bus travel is one of the aims too. Given the A23 is an important route in and out of London I’m sceptical how much traffic reduction we will see.
 
But again, how often would these journeys be taken? Maybe regularly if there are care responsibilities but that won’t be the case for many people. A car journey once every few months is very different from daily use, and the less often you drive, surely the less inconvenience you get from a LTN?
I only travel with the car at off peak times to visit friends and family, I commute to work by train and I enjoy living in a street with less through traffic, so I am a "winner" from LTNs.

I do have sympathy with the bus users seeing massive increases in their commute times. And I think objectively Streatham Wells LTN is less useful than some of the LTNs in more built up areas. So I can see both sides of the debate.
 
I suspect the buses you are referring to are ones that take children to specialist educational provision, and given the children will have various mobility issues between them it’s fair enough for them to be exempt from LTNs. Though again that’s not an excuse for speeding/driving like a twat if they are doing so.
The one round our way drives like a lunatic.

The lack of good radial bus routes is real though. This is a map of London where you can see how far you can get in a certain time on public transport.
It's a somewhat coarse tool, and you can't select for buses only, but stil illustrative.
I dropped a pin on the junction of the A23 and the South Circular, a major E-W road and set the time to 30 minutes:

1701857906720.png

In fact there are no buses that travel the length of the South Circular. here are plenty that use it for short spells, but turn off to continue N-S
It's very obvious that PT caters primarily to axial commuting.
 
Last edited:
I do have sympathy with the bus users seeing massive increases in their commute times. And I think objectively Streatham Wells LTN is less useful than some of the LTNs in more built up areas. So I can see both sides of the debate.
I do too, but I also find it interesting where most people’s ire seems to fall (the LTNs/changes rather than any drivers who refuse to change).
 
It's very obvious that PT caters primarily to axial commuting.
This is at least partly to do with the constraints of the physical infrastructure. As with many cities, London has tended to develop as a series of main routes in and out of the centre.

The south circular is not a purpose built thing but cobbled together out of bits of roads here and there, and a lot of it is two-lane so doesn't have room for dedicated bus lanes.

While I agree that east/west transport across South London should be improved, I don't think there are a lot of easy solutions.
 
This is at least partly to do with the constraints of the physical infrastructure. As with many cities, London has tended to develop as a series of main routes in and out of the centre.

The south circular is not a purpose built thing but cobbled together out of bits of roads here and there, and a lot of it is two-lane so doesn't have room for dedicated bus lanes.

While I agree that east/west transport across South London should be improved, I don't think there are a lot of easy solutions.
We need an over/underground Circle line like they have North of the river.

Of course in Victorian times they would just get on with it but in 2023 land values are so high the cost would be astronomical.
 
We need an over/underground Circle line like they have North of the river.

Of course in Victorian times they would just get on with it but in 2023 land values are so high the cost would be astronomical.
Or Line 14 in Paris, under construction right now.
 
No you don’t it neighbours Lambeth


Crystal Palace borders Bromley and is very close to Streatham common. It does neighbour the borough.

Someone who doesn’t have a car has a far more difficult time and probably won’t be able to see their family nearly so much. Again surely rather than “suck it up” we should be arguing for better public transport.
OK it just touches, but most public transport options take you through other boroughs first. Anyway if you lived in Crystal Palace you could just walk over the border into Bromley.

How about arguing for less cars so that buses aren't delayed??? No point having better buses if they are clogged up by cars?
 
If you don't have a car you have to suck up that time difference. How about feeling sorry for those people?

I do. Which is why I’m saying there should be much better public transport. Clearly easy to west public transport could be significantly improved. LTNs don’t always help in that respect and the Streatham wells one is currently massively making my bus commute worse.
 
I’m still slightly aghast by a woman on SMN going on about how she absolutely needed a car for the school/nursery/work journey, which was something we had been doing in various forms by public transport for years!
However this is an issue for some people. Especially if you are a single parent and don't work near where you live. I am currently struggling to find staff for my team of relatively low paid workers. The people we need have been priced out of Lambeth and are finding the bus journeys too problematic. Some of them have cars and want to drive but are deterred by the cost of parking.
So what to do? Perhaps every male person that provides sperm that makes a child should be legally obliged to share responsibility 50/50 for getting their children to school and back, legally enforceable of course with proper recourse if you don't meet the obligation.
And all salaries should be liveable and housing affordable before you put more obstacles in the way of those juggling balls and treading water to stay in work.
 
Back
Top Bottom