Rushy
basically a scrotum
It almost seems like you are taking critique of the project ... a bit personally.
Brixton Liveable Neighbourhood and LTN schemes - improvements for pedestrians and cyclists
- Thread starter teuchter
- Start date
It almost seems like you are taking critique of the project ... a bit personally.
thebackrow
Considerably more Brixton.
It almost seems like I attended some of those early, public, sessions and am tired of people insinuating things that clearly are not true, that onesie twat has repeatedly identified me on here so It’s hardly any secret. And I can confirm that that nothing was designed by enthusiastic amateurs (unless you think a public event at which people are invited to contribute ideas - you know the “public engagement” you’re saying didn’t happen despite it actually happening - shouldn’t have done)
Last edited:
Rushy
basically a scrotum
Yes I agree.
I don't entirely agree with this. The same offence is still being committed by going through the gate. The additional offence does not change that. Of course it's not as straightforward as someone driving through and having their number plate recorded on ANPR. But at the moment they produce no evidence at all even when there are multiple truck journeys a day, for instance. I'm generally thinking of covering of plates rather than fake ones.
Of course the argument is that polar at the extremes where the loons reside, but it would be unfair to write off all critique as an existential threat as some seem inclined to do.
teuchter
je suis teuchter
Are you proposing that Lambeth set up cameras that can automatically record number plates being covered up, and then driven through, such that the evidence they provide is sufficient for a fine to be issued?
I don't have much idea of how technically/legally difficult that would be to implement but presumably it would require additional infrastructure compared to what's already there.
Rushy
basically a scrotum
From what I understand they certainly can't do anything with what they have there. I doubt there is only one solution and would have thought that the most practical might be some limited permanent infrastructure with mobile / temporary additions. I understand that the TCPR in LBKC have permanent cameras set up to deal with this - I don't know the details.
The traffic order to make Streatham Hill LTN has been posted which gives people an opportunity to object to it until 22nd July.
As far as I’m aware any objects to stop it would be over a technical or process kind rather than I don’t like it as the public consultation has already happened.
This hasn’t stopped Ian Armstrong from pushing OneLambeth’s handy objection form pre populated with all your concerns.
docs.google.com
Interestingly Ian has shared the ‘results’ on Nextdoor but left off any for people with disabilities
As far as I’m aware any objects to stop it would be over a technical or process kind rather than I don’t like it as the public consultation has already happened.
This hasn’t stopped Ian Armstrong from pushing OneLambeth’s handy objection form pre populated with all your concerns.
SAY NO! TO LAMBETH LTNs. OPEN OUR ROADS.
Thank you for visiting...we urgently need your help! Please enter your email address to continue:
docs.google.com
Interestingly Ian has shared the ‘results’ on Nextdoor but left off any for people with disabilities
One Lambeth are back in the telegraph after a FOI request revealed Lambeth has made almost £22 million in fines in the last year! A spokesman for One Lambeth said, "It's an awful lot of money and it's probably more than any other council has made.” Anonymous source again
Nice of all the knobheads to pay more than 5% of lambeths budget.
thebackrow
Considerably more Brixton.
can't believe this non-story has been covered by the BBC.
If your'e struggling to pay your bills you could, you know, drive legally and not pay fines. Should we suspend speeding cameras when people are hard up?
OneLambeth seems to have neither a website nor a twitter account anymore. Seems to be little more than Ian Armstrong and Dave McCall posting the same message day after day (whether under his own name or as Stella Sawyer).
Last edited:
liquidindian
Hello
Does this even exist any more?
thebackrow
Considerably more Brixton.
NoneLambeth
sparkybird
ask the bird...
Plus if you're actually poor (and I know that's subjective) you probably can't afford a car in the first place. Car owning households in Lambeth have fallen and now 60% have no car. Car free are the majority.
sparkybird
ask the bird...
People are still donating to the fundraiser, even thought it's not been updated since early April.
So I guess so. I don't know if they decided to appeal again?
They’ve been active on Facebook as Lambeth posted a couple of times about the have your say on the permanent design which triggered them
Presumably unless all pavements were removed and all front gardens were zoned for parking the car-liban weren’t happy ?
liquidindian
Hello
If Lambeth had a "have an incoherent rant" they'd be happier.
toblerone3
Grrrrr
I went on a protest march in Bow in Tower Hamlets against the immediate removal of a much needed traffic filter on a local road (Antill Road) which was one of the main rat runs with traffic coming off the A12. The debate about LTNs in Tower Hamlets where Luftur Rahman has vowed to open all roads to cars is a toxic hornet's nest with personal abuse being thrown around.
Have suffered some pretty upsetting abuse and harrassment on 'Living in Bow' Facebook group this afternoon. Including one poster bring my five year old son's name into the argument (child stalking don't know how they found out the name) for not being working class enough.
Have screengrabbed and reported the posts. Might delete this post later.
Have suffered some pretty upsetting abuse and harrassment on 'Living in Bow' Facebook group this afternoon. Including one poster bring my five year old son's name into the argument (child stalking don't know how they found out the name) for not being working class enough.
Have screengrabbed and reported the posts. Might delete this post later.
Last edited:
toblerone3
Grrrrr
Its pretty low but I do need to tighten my privacy settings I think.
Sorry to hear that & unfortunately not surprising. Think they tend to be harmless but really not nice.
Crazy to see on a day like today so many driving in ridiculous SUVs and tons of idling engines.
AC doesn’t work on batteries Ed !
teuchter
je suis teuchter
Good on you for going to the protest though.
I was wondering if any of these reopenings could actually provide a good demonstration of the purpose of the restrictions. People will notice if currently quiet streets suddenly become refilled with traffic, and it's unlikely there's going to be a magic reduction in congestion elsewhere.
thebackrow
Considerably more Brixton.
He’s a one isn’t he?
“Poor housing and services, high tax and low social mobility”
after 12 years of Conservative government
“Poor housing and services, high tax and low social mobility”
after 12 years of Conservative government
sleaterkinney
Well-Known Member
Apart from his own eviction services company of course.
thebackrow
Considerably more Brixton.
Railton and Oval were made permanent back in December and the engagement on the final designs has ended. Streatham Hill and Tulse Hill decision was made on June 8 22. I suppose the Ferndale decision is still due (they've not published a consultation report yet) but what's the significance of this Friday?
[edit - I see it's the end of the Tulse Hill and Streatham Hill permanent traffic order statutory consultation]
Given that there has been a public consultation and they're just submitting the same objections again, which the council has already responded to in the consultation report and had visibility of when making the decision to make permanent this seems a total waste of effort. They're starting to look like those Japanese soldiers still out in the jungle fighting the Second World War decades after it had ended. 60 years after the war ends, two soldiers emerge from the jungle
[edit - I see it's the end of the Tulse Hill and Streatham Hill permanent traffic order statutory consultation]
Given that there has been a public consultation and they're just submitting the same objections again, which the council has already responded to in the consultation report and had visibility of when making the decision to make permanent this seems a total waste of effort. They're starting to look like those Japanese soldiers still out in the jungle fighting the Second World War decades after it had ended. 60 years after the war ends, two soldiers emerge from the jungle
Last edited:
Yep - Ian’s very confused. It’s that people have until 22nd July to the Streatham Hill traffic order. Presumably this is about procedure rather than just not liking it.
Given the rampant fraud of antis filling out the actual consultations one can only image you hat their own skewed survey results will be like.
Similar threads
