sleaterkinney
Well-Known Member
Not against the lycra clad cyclists on their payroll?
Brixton Liveable Neighbourhood and LTN schemes - improvements for pedestrians and cyclists
- Thread starter teuchter
- Start date
thebackrow
Considerably more Brixton.
Clearly not but chowce5382 never passes up an opportunity to behave like an arsehole and derive the opposite meaning from what anyone has said. He’s broken the forum rules so many times he should have been banned long ago.
It might be why he’s so confused about everything else - for all his legal knowledge he seems unable to comprehend the meaning of even quite basic sentences.
chowce5382
Active Member
Not sure which rule I’ve just broken? Can you explain?
Last edited:
chowce5382
Active Member
If I was I’d being pursuing a political route. I’m not so that answers that one
sleaterkinney
Well-Known Member
Is making a speech in windrush sq talking about lycra-clad white middle class men political?
chowce5382
Active Member
Not when you’re doing it to raise money to fund a legal challenge. If you were doing it as part of a process to overturn the current local government at the next election then it would be.
teuchter
je suis teuchter
You know fine well what rule you've broken, which is linking people's real life identities with their identity on here.
This was already explained to you:
Brixton Liveable Neighbourhood and LTN schemes - improvements for pedestrians and cyclists
As I’ve said again and again Ed, this is nothing do with me. If you called me a Blairite, I’d be very happy and comfortable with that. You still associate with this and have never condemned it - just said nothing to do with you despite you saying you’re their treasurer. As snowy_again says...
www.urban75.net
teuchter
je suis teuchter
Clearly it's a strictly defined legal term, used only to clarify some legal technicalities in relation to a campaign entirely limited to concerns about consideration of those with disabilities.
chowce5382
Active Member
Well, when it comes to LCC it not too far off the mark
chowce5382
Active Member
I was told that you couldn’t name names. I like the fact that you’re relying on this rather than picking up the point I was making. Obviously that’s just not important to youYou know fine well what rule you've broken, which is linking people's real life identities with their identity on here.
This was already explained to you:
Brixton Liveable Neighbourhood and LTN schemes - improvements for pedestrians and cyclists
As I’ve said again and again Ed, this is nothing do with me. If you called me a Blairite, I’d be very happy and comfortable with that. You still associate with this and have never condemned it - just said nothing to do with you despite you saying you’re their treasurer. As snowy_again says...
chowce5382
Active Member
So they were on the payroll? Asking for a friend
You seem to be taking in the conspiracy theories your mates keep spouting chowce5382 - here's a refresher.
thebackrow
Considerably more Brixton.
It is weird that this person @chowse5382 seems obsessed with made one stupid statement about three years ago, which didn’t seem representative of anything else they’d ever said or reflected in their behaviour in any way, and for which they had apologised and seemingly paid a fairly heavy price. Someone was an arsehole for the length of time it took to write a few tweets and presumably learnt from that and moved on. For OneLambeth to be still obsessed with them now they must have been amazingly influential and made a real difference. They seem terrified that person might continue to be using their skills and knowledge to make the case for a better Lambeth.
Yet he seems happy to associate with Sam, who despite being warned by the Police about her behaviour, appears to have carried on with the online abuse under another identity, as the official rep of his group, ever since. In the same way that despite having been warned about linking people to real life identities on here he continues to try to do so - there is no repentance nor growth.
Some people seem destined to always be arseholes. And arseholes on account of being full of shit, rather than cunts, which have warmth and depth. Qualities he and Sam seem to completely lack.
Yet he seems happy to associate with Sam, who despite being warned by the Police about her behaviour, appears to have carried on with the online abuse under another identity, as the official rep of his group, ever since. In the same way that despite having been warned about linking people to real life identities on here he continues to try to do so - there is no repentance nor growth.
Some people seem destined to always be arseholes. And arseholes on account of being full of shit, rather than cunts, which have warmth and depth. Qualities he and Sam seem to completely lack.
Last edited:
BigTom
Well-Known Member
Are you again trying to claim that LCC is mostly white males in lycra and generally represents this group/type of cyclists?
Because we went through this before and there was a good mix of apparent genders and ethnicities from the names/photos of their employees and going through their website I don't remember a single picture of anyone wearing lycra on their website.
LCC and other local campaign groups, like Cycling UK, do not represent sports cyclists who are most likely to be wearing lycra. They represent ordinary people who want to cycle and wear normal clothes to do so, they represent people who don't want to cycle fast and probably couldn't if they did want to (like me) and ultimately they represent all the people who currently don't cycle because it's not safe but would like to.
Please go and show me anything - I mean literally anything at all - from LCC which presents people wearing lycra or doing sports cycling.
If you can't do that then it's just pure prejudice on your part isn't it.
chowce5382
Active Member
But they didn’t learn from it did they as they have said since that you shouldn’t put something on social media that you wouldn’t say face to face. This undercuts the premise of what they are saying. I also wouldn’t say it a heavy price, it was probably right. Again, saying it was a heavy price, undercuts their protestations of contrition and so their apologies can’t be believed as a result
sleaterkinney
Well-Known Member
Let's be clear here, politics isn't just something that happens in Westminster or Lambeth Town Hall meeting rooms.
It was very much politics, why do you think Shaun Bailey showed up with his bus?
chowce5382
Active Member
Because he was standing for office. He took a political stance and said he would review them if he got into office. I said no such thing as I wasn’t sanding for office or holding myself out as doing so. That why supporting a legal challenge
from what i recall they invited all the candidates for london mayor to speak then claimed it wasn't a political rally
sleaterkinney
Well-Known Member
Didn’t Tory councillor and eviction specialist Tim Briggs speak at this non-political rally?
Tim Briggs has really lost the plot with this rant of a question (seems quite similar to chowce5382 's talking points 
).
).chowce5382
Active Member
The answer seems pretty vacuous whatever you think about the question.Tim Briggs has really lost the plot with this rant of a question (seems quite similar to chowce5382 's talking points
View attachment 306389
liquidindian
Hello
The last thing Tim wanted was an answer.
BigTom
Well-Known Member
Yeah, that definitely reads like someone who would be interested in a sensible reasonable debate. I wonder if anyone in the Conservative party has ever said anything racist Tim? Doesn't that mean we should also say your advice and thoughts comes from the vile racists of the Conservative party?
Also I'm pretty sure Lambeth council are funding the reporting and analysis of traffic levels on their roads, not LCC. I'm sure LCC have in the past funded Rachel Aldred to do some studies but that's not what he implies there. It's just a fucking joke. The answer isn't any good either but yeah I can't imagine having a reasonable conversation with tim briggs of the vile racist conservative party about LTNs.
Also I'm pretty sure Lambeth council are funding the reporting and analysis of traffic levels on their roads, not LCC. I'm sure LCC have in the past funded Rachel Aldred to do some studies but that's not what he implies there. It's just a fucking joke. The answer isn't any good either but yeah I can't imagine having a reasonable conversation with tim briggs of the vile racist conservative party about LTNs.
chowce5382
Active Member
Rather than the anti-Semitic Labour Party? Both are equally guilty on the charge you’ve raised
It was barely a question.
chowce5382
Active Member
Do better than that Ed
What was the question? Seemed like virtue signaling to me (to borrow a phrase).
Also, stop calling me Ed - not just because it's against the rules but it's far too over familiar from someone I really don't want to be at all familiar with.
chowce5382
Active Member
Ok, fair enough. I’ll call you edcraw. Better? Or ed for short.
No - use usernames. You're coming across pretty poorly these days and that's saying a lot.
Similar threads
