Haven’t seen him campaigning to rip out this filter on Crescent Lane which surely displaces traffic onto the residents of Clapham Park.
Brixton Liveable Neighbourhood and LTN schemes - improvements for pedestrians and cyclists
- Thread starter teuchter
- Start date
BigTom
Well-Known Member
Well that's me convinced, after all doesn't every LTN advocate argue that 100% of journeys must be made by walking, cycling or pogo stick?
Presumably he’s in favour of his voters driving through other areas, and against anyone else driving through his area.
liquidindian
Hello
thebackrow
Considerably more Brixton.
I see one of the loudest Onesies is over on next door "railing" against a new pedestrian crossing on Streatham High Road. By "colluding" do they actually mean "co-ordination", with work on the main roads as well as the side streets to improve safety and convenience for people walking and cycling? It really is all a massive conspiracy.
sparkybird
ask the bird...
Apparently the TfL work has been long in the planning, even before Lambeth put in any LTNs so difficult to see how they could be colluding.
I just don't get it, if cash strapped TfL have identified a project that could save lives and serious injuries, how is that not something good?
I just don't get it, if cash strapped TfL have identified a project that could save lives and serious injuries, how is that not something good?
Think his paranoia has grown through the year, particularly as their doomed approach to answering a questionnaire probably meant they were excluded. To be fair to him, he’s been consistent and open to debate which is how it should be, unlike all those anonymous Twitter accounts
sleaterkinney
Well-Known Member
Any of our resident onesies care to comment on this:
www.lambeth-labour.org.uk
Lambeth makes first LTN schemes permanent - Lambeth Labour
Cllr Danny Adilypour is the Cabinet Member for Sustainable Transport, Environment and Clean Air (job-share) and a councillor in Streatham South ward. In December, the council published its intention to make the Railton and Oval to Stockwell low traffic neighbourhood schemes permanent. These...
www.lambeth-labour.org.uk
sparkybird
ask the bird...
wow, how did they ever think that was going to get past the data analysts?
Well some of them aren’t the brightest.
I doesn’t sound like it’s something that could be automated so sounds like it was done manually!
Big day in court next week. The appeal on the judicial review. I was fairly sure the basis of the appeal was whether Lambeth could use a rolling EQIA (unless I’m mistaken). If they win, presumably, rolling EQIA’s should not be used but as Lambeth now have an updated one for the permanent schemes, it’s academic. Only £8550 raised so far though out of £14500 needed. Big bill for someone….
thebackrow
Considerably more Brixton.
It’s a(nother) massive corrupt conspiracy that…er…somebody has actually read the Lambeth Labour page on the link in the tweet that they'd screenshotted.Any of our resident onesies care to comment on this:
Lambeth makes first LTN schemes permanent - Lambeth Labour
Cllr Danny Adilypour is the Cabinet Member for Sustainable Transport, Environment and Clean Air (job-share) and a councillor in Streatham South ward. In December, the council published its intention to make the Railton and Oval to Stockwell low traffic neighbourhood schemes permanent. These...
Last edited:
editor
hiraethified
Two LTNs to become permanent Lambeth Council confirms that Railton and Oval to Stockwell Low Traffic Neighbourhoods are to be made permanent
This is exciting
Hopefully the council will have enough money to really transform some areas.
“In both LTNs there will be exceptions for Blue Badge holders who are reliant on driving, being driven or on visitors who arrive by car. Taxis and fully accessible private hire vehicles will also be exempt along with rapid response healthcare providers and the emergency services.”
sleaterkinney
Well-Known Member
Surely no need for the court case now, right?“In both LTNs there will be exceptions for Blue Badge holders who are reliant on driving, being driven or on visitors who arrive by car. Taxis and fully accessible private hire vehicles will also be exempt along with rapid response healthcare providers and the emergency services.”
right? ;-/
The onesies don’t give a toss about blue badge holders of disabled people
Their narrative definitely seems to have gone away from this and now seems to be concern for pollution on boundary roads - as if the people campaigning for LTNs aren’t also in favour of measures to reduce this eg. ULEZ etc
It’s been exhausting how the opposition keeps coming up with changing concerns and bad faith arguments.
We should have been doing these measures decades ago like the Dutch but glad they’re becoming mainstream finally.
nick
Pleomorphic Adenomas R us
I'm no fan of the antis, but if this is true I could see it being interpreted as "big brother" stomping on the face of the plucky democratic antis.
Surely the Stop LTN placards are a useful way to mark out the residents worth talking to if/when the authorities go round making enquiries about the repeated vandalism?
Surely the Stop LTN placards are a useful way to mark out the residents worth talking to if/when the authorities go round making enquiries about the repeated vandalism?
Good point - there's online reporting so that's probably more likely than the council doing it off it's own back:
Reporting a board that breaches regulations
If you suspect that an estate agent board is being displayed outside of the regulations, you can report it to the Planning Enforcement Team. Contact the Planning Enforcement Team Online reporting form Email: planningenforcement@lambeth.gov.uk.
beta.lambeth.gov.uk
Jesterburger
Well-Known Member
Most other sign boards (estate agent ones; party political ones at elections; school fairs) come down after the event ends.
If anyone is allowed to erect permanent signs for any reason without enforcement, then it opens chances for more people to do the same. So I agree that if people have complained the council really should treat it as a standard enforcement complaint otherwise it sets a precedent.
If anyone is allowed to erect permanent signs for any reason without enforcement, then it opens chances for more people to do the same. So I agree that if people have complained the council really should treat it as a standard enforcement complaint otherwise it sets a precedent.
Similar threads
