TopCat
Putin fanboy
That's the spirit.A very large percentage of the U.K. population can get fucked, quite frankly.
That's the spirit.A very large percentage of the U.K. population can get fucked, quite frankly.
When my industry is on the verge of being completely fucked over due to a cavalcade of lies, then yes, it’s exactly the spirit.That's the spirit.
Really. So you actually envisage loads of people all pretending to be musicians and then pretending to go on pretend tours abroad with their fellow pretend musicians, all paying £227/year?Nothing other than I was just agreeing with Pickman's model that a special musicians passport would be a backdoor for non-musicians to regain FOM.
No of course not but that will still be an argument against it won't it? regardless of how many actually do it. Good luck with your attempt to get what you want by the way but I don't believe you have the slightest chance of achieving it.Really. So you actually envisage loads of people all pretending to be musicians and then pretending to go on pretend tours abroad with their fellow pretend musicians, all paying £227/year?
you'd have to bring back pubs firstbring back pianos in pubs. the professionalisation of music has taken music away from working class people.
they started shutting when they got rid of the pianos.you'd have to bring back pubs first
Just to confirm, all this has been made as hard for eu bands / organisations as UK ones? So less chance of seeing eg the Berlin philharmonic or Los fastidios or whoever in London I suppose
that's ok, boris johnson's working his hardest to ensure that a separate visa will be needed for scotland and perhaps wales too, while the six counties will doubtless be reintegrated into their southern neighboursort of - the issue is that for the eu band, they do it once and they can come to the uk and play in London Leeds Manchester and Newcastle.
for a uk band touring Europe - they have to do it per country.
The lack of live music in pubs is more to do with the cheapness of recorded music and a gradual erosion of the power of the musicians Union over the last half century than the professionalisation of music - there was far, far more people making livings as musicians in the years of pianos in pubs.bring back pianos in pubs. the professionalisation of music has taken music away from working class people.
Yes, you've made your opinion on the value and importance of arts and culture very clear indeed.No of course not but that will still be an argument against it won't it? regardless of how many actually do it. Good luck with your attempt to get what you want by the way but I don't believe you have the slightest chance of achieving it.
In order to do so you will have to convince the UK Govt to convince the EU that musicians are a special group of worker who should have privileged access over all other groups of workers. You aren't convincing me so I can't imagine that anyone in Brussels is going to buy it either.
Brexit barbarians...Yes, you've made your opinion on the value and importance of arts and culture very clear indeed.
Do you think only 'professional' sounding bands play in pubs then?bring back pianos in pubs. the professionalisation of music has taken music away from working class people.
Snappy.Brexit barbarians...
It clearly is a very large percentage. It’s a very tiny majority, but you don’t even need to be a majority to count as a large percentage. If 30% of the population want something, I’d still say that’s a large percentage that want it.52% isn't a "VERY LARGE PERCENTAGE" in anyone's book, come on MickiQ !
hmmm, I would agree with others that a large percentage would be 2/3 66%+It clearly is a very large percentage. It’s a very tiny majority, but you don’t even need to be a majority to count as a large percentage. If 30% of the population want something, I’d still say that’s a large percentage that want it.
the more of you under the bus, the more work for my mate bosha and his mobile disco.Snappy.
But what's your opinion as a Brexit fan? Are musicians fair game to be thrown under the bus as collateral damage for the supposedly wonderful gains of Brexit?
If you wanted to go and live and work in Germany then I can't see you should have priority over anyone else.Snappy.
But what's your opinion as a Brexit fan? Are musicians fair game to be thrown under the bus as collateral damage for the supposedly wonderful gains of Brexit?
Another music hater arrives, laughing at musicians losing their jobs.the more of you under the bus, the more work for my mate bosha and his mobile disco.
and in kabbes' example of 30%, a large proportion, like 70%, don't want it.hmmm, I would agree with others that a large percentage would be 2/3 66%+
who makes the stuff that bosha plays? its only british musicians i dont like.Another music hater arrives, laughing at musicians losing their jobs.
Surely this is an example of how "free movement" is a propaganda term used for emotive purposes, rather than a piece of language used to help make things clearer? Like, is "travelling and performing throughout the EU for a period of less than 90 days without requiring a visa" freedom of movement? I reckon it's fair to say it is. And "the right to permanent residency in any EU member state with the same rights and entitlements as any regular citizen of that state" is also freedom of movement. But I'm not sure it makes sense to say "A very large percentage of the population wanted [the right to permanent residency and so on] ended, therefore [visa-free travel for a period of less than 90 days]" has to go.Free movement for musicians is out of the question without free movement for everyone else. And indeed it should be why should musicians be a privileged group as opposed to brickies, plumbers, lawyers or bar staff. However free movement is a two way street and the British government and a very large percentage of the UK population wanted it ended.
This issue isn't about visa free travel (which with one or two minor modifications we still have) it's about the right to work anywhere in the EU without being treated any different from being a citizen of the country you're in. That's what FOM is about not the right to sit on a beach for a couple of weeks. FoM is a redline to the EU and there is a limit to how much they will compromise on it. Sadly ending it was a redline for the UK Govt and they weren't keen on compromising either so here we are and a lot of people are unhappy about being caught in the middle of it.Surely this is an example of how "free movement" is a propaganda term used for emotive purposes, rather than a piece of language used to help make things clearer? Like, is "travelling and performing throughout the EU for a period of less than 90 days without requiring a visa" freedom of movement? I reckon it's fair to say it is. And "the right to permanent residency in any EU member state with the same rights and entitlements as any regular citizen of that state" is also freedom of movement. But I'm not sure it makes sense to say "A very large percentage of the population wanted [the right to permanent residency and so on] ended, therefore [visa-free travel for a period of less than 90 days]" has to go.
Yeah this is my current thinking.For touring though the current arrangements seem shit. I expect a deal allowing you to tour will come in before the covid emergency has finished.
Absolutely correct. We could have worked out a deal where FoM could be kept for British citizens without us remaining in the EU,. Norway, Iceland, Lichtenstein and Switzerland have FoM rights, however FoM cuts both ways. In order for UK citizens to have FoM in the EU, we would have to accept their citizens have the same rights here. Taking Back Control (God I hate that phrase) was all about restoring UK control over immigration policy and the Conservatives made that a central plank of their manifesto.I mean, obviously I'm not in charge of the EU negotiations, so wot I think doesn't have much relevance to anything really. I still think that if we're talking on the level of principles, it should hypothetically be possible to work out a deal where people would have the right to work elsewhere in the EU for a limited period of time, and I'm not sure that such a deal would in itself be betraying the democratic vote or whatever. Whether there's any chance of Johnson and co putting that into practice without completely fucking it up is another question of course.
Roger Daltreys pigeons coming home to roost