Or, the UK Independent Party?
British Liberals Independence Party.
Or, the UK Independent Party?
What's wrong with march 30 or 31? if he does it on 1/4 everyone will think it's an April foolsMy one solace is that, when on 1st April, when he realises that the UK is STILL full of foreigners, and the EU really isn't that arsed that we've left, Nigel Farrage will walk calmly to the centre of Trafalgar Square, right next to lion number three, and shoot himself.
British Liberals Independence Party.
It’s not a funny acronym, but I’d still bet on this.If I was a betting man, which I am, I’d risk a flutter on “The Progressive Party”.
One thing I hadn't realised before today, but Starmer was explicit about it - it is now official Labour policy to call for a second ref. I'd missed that switch, but as I say, Starmer was very clear.
BBC political editor Laura Kuenssberg says MPs are voting on "what they do not want to do". She says the "idea is" that MPs will express a "strong view" that they do not want to leave the EU without a deal. "It's not binding, it's not a concrete guarantee," she says. They are expressing their will, she adds, "but that doesn't change the law".
The BBC's Europe editor, Katya Adler, says "hearts really are hardening" in Europe, but the Commission is more positive about an extension to Article 50 than the individual member states themselves. She says that the way out of the impasse must come from the UK, the EU is saying. There is also concern that Brexit could "overshadow" upcoming European elections. All 27 EU countries have to agree to an extension, she adds.
Only on weekendsI'm fucking confused. Are we leaving the EU or not?
I'm fucking confused. Are we leaving the EU or not?
why do you think it's an accident?So the Spelman amendment passed, meaning the other no deal vote, the one everyone was going to vote for, Tories included, won’t now get voted on. Have labour accidentally been very clever by making a whole load of Tory mps who were against no deal accidentally go on record as voting against an amendment that was against no deal?
It has been since last year, after all other options are exhausted - Corbyn mentions it a lot despite all the people on twitter saying he doesn’t.One thing I hadn't realised before today, but Starmer was explicit about it - it is now official Labour policy to call for a second ref. I'd missed that switch, but as I say, Starmer was very clear.
Cripes - passed by only four votes? It's still "not binding" so fuck knows what May and co will do now, although it means there is more of an imperative to come up with "something" that prevents the UK leaving with No Deal on 29th March. That will still happen if they don't stop playing tiddlywinks.
It has been since last year, after all other options are exhausted - Corbyn mentions it a lot despite all the people on twitter saying he doesn’t.
This is fucking hilarious. In a "we're all so fucked" kind of way.Guardian feed reporting that Gov now whipping against the vote
No you're not you just want the UK to remain in the EU by whatever means.
Guardian feed reporting that Gov now whipping against the vote
This. A million times thisThis is fucking hilarious. In a "we're all so fucked" kind of way.
Drowning, not waving territoryThis is fucking hilarious. In a "we're all so fucked" kind of way.
What I've done there is forget March isn't February.....What's wrong with march 30 or 31? if he does it on 1/4 everyone will think it's an April fools