Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

BrewDog: yet another hip company using 'rebel' language to sell its stuff

you are probably here more than most people...
Spy leads the field with 736, editor doesn't even break the 500 brogdale down at just over the 200 :(

true that he's here more than most people but there again most people don't post on urban
 
An interesting look at the recent PR campaign: BrewDog’s World Cup ‘anti-sponsorship’ is a shameless PR stunt. And it’s a good one

"For those dismissing the campaign, most of the criticism focuses on two questions. The first and most difficult to answer is: given that BrewDog’s bars will still be showing games despite its strongly anti-Qatar stance, doesn’t the campaign collapse under its own hypocrisy?

I would argue not. The reality is that a boycott would benefit no one. Fans would simply choose a different pub, staff would miss out on extra shifts and BrewDog would be missing out on revenue during a tough winter for no real benefit.

Instead, by showing the games and making donations to relevant charities, the brand is able to provide a platform to criticize Qatar while raising money for needy causes. It might be a less morally satisfying stance, but it’s also a less futile one.

BrewDog’s critics would rightly point out that it’s only the profits from Lost Lager that are going to charity, not the profits of their bars as a whole. And it’s perhaps true that, given the large sums of money the company is likely spending on media to promote the campaign, BrewDog would rather no one looked too closely at the exact sums that will be going to charity.

But the fact is that some money going to charity does more good than no money going to charity, which is why BrewDog’s philosophically untidy approach is preferable to a boycott.
.......
The marketing and communications industry’s obsession with ‘purpose’ can have real benefits for society, but it all too often blinds us to what we’re supposed to be doing: promoting our clients.

Yes, it’s true that BrewDog’s ‘anti-sponsorship of the World Cup’ is an opportunistic and superficial stunt designed to grab attention in a transparent attempt to promote BrewDog and make the company more money.

But why does everyone say that like it’s a bad thing?"
 
An interesting look at the recent PR campaign: BrewDog’s World Cup ‘anti-sponsorship’ is a shameless PR stunt. And it’s a good one

"For those dismissing the campaign, most of the criticism focuses on two questions. The first and most difficult to answer is: given that BrewDog’s bars will still be showing games despite its strongly anti-Qatar stance, doesn’t the campaign collapse under its own hypocrisy?

I would argue not. The reality is that a boycott would benefit no one. Fans would simply choose a different pub, staff would miss out on extra shifts and BrewDog would be missing out on revenue during a tough winter for no real benefit.

Instead, by showing the games and making donations to relevant charities, the brand is able to provide a platform to criticize Qatar while raising money for needy causes. It might be a less morally satisfying stance, but it’s also a less futile one.

BrewDog’s critics would rightly point out that it’s only the profits from Lost Lager that are going to charity, not the profits of their bars as a whole. And it’s perhaps true that, given the large sums of money the company is likely spending on media to promote the campaign, BrewDog would rather no one looked too closely at the exact sums that will be going to charity.

But the fact is that some money going to charity does more good than no money going to charity, which is why BrewDog’s philosophically untidy approach is preferable to a boycott.
.......
The marketing and communications industry’s obsession with ‘purpose’ can have real benefits for society, but it all too often blinds us to what we’re supposed to be doing: promoting our clients.

Yes, it’s true that BrewDog’s ‘anti-sponsorship of the World Cup’ is an opportunistic and superficial stunt designed to grab attention in a transparent attempt to promote BrewDog and make the company more money.

But why does everyone say that like it’s a bad thing?"
What is it about this marketing industry copy that you find particularly "interesting"?
 
PR man argues PR campaign good. I don't find that especially interesting.

I'm not aware that there's been a concerted call to boycott Brewdog bars for World Cup matches, though, so even the PR man's praise rests on something of a straw man argument.

(Incidentally, the author seems to concede on his Twitter that their deal to sell in Qatar itself further undermines Brewdog's charitability claim here.)
 
But God knows you've tried to find one

Not really with their beer. I've long since decided that their offerings are some way off what I want in an ale. They do a cracking gin though (LoneWolf), and some of their food is excellent. Obviously though, where they really come into their own is the strength of their PR, Marketing, and Business Development.

Absolutely outstanding.
 
Well, PR campaigns are to promote the brand, and to increase sales.

This one looks as though it will be successful, even though people are moaning about it.

I find that interesting.
In so much as any industry puff piece could be interesting; then fair play if it interests you.

To me it looks more relevant to the thread than interesting, in that it considers just the latest example of the company's hypocritical, "edgy" marketing.
 
Well, PR campaigns are to promote the brand, and to increase sales.

This one looks as though it will be successful, even though people are moaning about it.

I find that interesting.
But no opinion whatsoever about the morality of a multi-million, multinational company using the plight of workers and the LGBTQ community in Qatar as a means to increase sales and brand awareness?
 
Back
Top Bottom