billy_bob
Air of bewilderment model's own
How funny did you find it?
Did you laugh aloud, grin a bit and snort, or just think "huh" without any overt expession?
I laughed out loud. I don't do it that often, so when I say I did it, I mean it.
How funny did you find it?
Did you laugh aloud, grin a bit and snort, or just think "huh" without any overt expession?
I laughed out loud. I don't do it that often, so when I say I did it, I mean it.
I laughed out loud. I don't do it that often, so when I say I did it, I mean it.
He literally says he is not after money…Kind of weird that no one seems to know anything about this 'concerted campaign of harassment, lies and fraud.'
If he's looking for damages, he's going to have to prove reputational damage and that might get interesting
You actually swallow all this horseshit? That is so funny.He literally says he is not after money…
He concluded: "This was never about money for myself or Martin. Ever. We could have cashed out years ago, never bought the Lost Forest, never signed off a further £70m+ investment this year alone.
"It’s about doing something different and building a business we are proud of and I’m sorry that there are a handful of people on a criminal mission to bring us down."
Walking past Marble Arch just now, this sage fella said:
"He has given freely to the poor,
His righteousness endures forever;
His horn will be exalted in honor".
I thought he was probably pissed and talking bollocks but it turns out it's from the bible (psalm 112:9)
It just reminded me of James Watt, a bit.
Is that true? If so my calling the chief engineer just chief, or any other chief something just as chief is offending a lot of people. There's a lot of professions where people are referred to as chief rather than by full title when talking to them.SpookyFrank actually referred to him as "chief"
Which is outrageously offensive to Native Americans, and comparable to the "N" word in some their communities.
Disappointing.
i was just worried that you hadn't read the articleYou actually swallow all this horseshit? That is so funny.
James Watt and Martin Dickie literally flogged off a chunk of the company to venture capitalists for £100 million years ago.He literally says he is not after money…
He concluded: "This was never about money for myself or Martin. Ever. We could have cashed out years ago, never bought the Lost Forest, never signed off a further £70m+ investment this year alone.
"It’s about doing something different and building a business we are proud of and I’m sorry that there are a handful of people on a criminal mission to bring us down."
Mate, if that's what it takes to amuse you, we should do a night out.
I'd have you in fucking stitches
He literally says he is not after money…
He concluded: "This was never about money for myself or Martin. Ever. We could have cashed out years ago, never bought the Lost Forest, never signed off a further £70m+ investment this year alone.
"It’s about doing something different and building a business we are proud of and I’m sorry that there are a handful of people on a criminal mission to bring us down."
Thanks, but our respective tastes in beer would be an insurmountable difference for me.
Ah, a "craft ale" man, eh?
Well kind of, but that's not what I meant. More that your contrarian edgelord trolling antics in favour of Watt are tiresome enough on this thread. I can do without an evening of similar.
Surely you'd spend the whole evening laughing?Well kind of, but that's not what I meant. More that your contrarian edgelord trolling antics in favour of Watt are tiresome enough on this thread. I can do without an evening of similar.
Surely you'd spend the whole evening laughing?
So it's not abut our respective tastes in beer at all then?
Your taste in beer = Brewdog are not pricks. HTH.
Did you believe him when he said that he hadn't bullied staff too? And when he made up all those PR lies that he never delivered on? Bless.i was just worried that you hadn't read the article
I get the impression that people are so eager to be negative & damming about them that they fail to read & fully comprehend information provided.What's your point? You keep posting things without any comment of your own and then acting as if you're just some kind of neutral information service making sure we're all kept up to speed. But the cumulative slant of the things you've chosen to post tends to give the impression that you have a stake in Brewdog, possibly in some marketing or PR capacity.
If that's not the case, why not share some of the negative, damning info about them too? Or, I don't know, actually express your own opinion on the rights and wrongs of the stuff that's happening?
i think my point was that he was not interested in suing someone for libel/slander going by what he said in the article anywayJames Watt and Martin Dickie literally flogged off a chunk of the company to venture capitalists for £100 million years ago.
Which parts about the bullying of his staff and his creepy attitude towards women have we all failed to fully comprehend?I get the impression that people are so eager to be negative & damming about them that they fail to read & fully comprehend information provided.
I dont care about Brewdog really, i quite like hoppy, citrusy craft beer.
I think the owner is probably a bit of a tosser but probably not a massive tosser but dont think he is the devil incarnate
Well there's a severe failure going on here, isnt there?
Even if it were so though, you would almost certainly come away from our night out, better informed, and quite probably better looking. Look at it as a self improvement opportunity.
Maybe the fact that he's now suing the director of a media agency for a campaign of untrue allegations about him?Which parts about the bullying of his staff and his creepy attitude towards women have we all failed to fully comprehend?
But the accusations of bullying and creepy behaviour came from hundreds of current and ex-employees not one person.Maybe the fact that he's now suing the director of a media agency for a campaign of untrue allegations about him?
As I said earlier, this could be a very interesting case.
Let's wait and see what the trial reveals.But the accusations of bullying and creepy behaviour came from hundreds of current and ex-employees not one person.
Wait - so you're actually suggesting that the people who appeared in the BBC documentary weren't telling the truth?Let's wait and see what the trial reveals.
That one person is very clever, it's true.
plus one hundred and six anonymous former staff, and thirty-nine current staff (and counting, as of 1st July 2021) who did not feel safe to include either their names or initials. Make of that what you will.