Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

BNP national demo in Keighley

Chuck Wilson said:
Please don't call me Christ and remember not to take any drugs to the demo. Btw UAF have called for a peaceful demo , how does that fit the 'no platform ' policy of WP?




I wondered that when I read WP Member's above post bemoaning SWP wet liberalism.

Could the day when the true vanguard bursts forth into the conciousness of the most advanced workers be close at hand?
 
MC5 said:
The Three Legs has changed a lot then, as the SWP used to have weekly meetings in the upstairs room for years. It was The Vine next door which had a fascist presence, has did a number of pubs in the Beeston area - a NF stronghold one time.


So much of a NF stronghold that the 'No Platform' SWP held meetings in the pub next door to theirs?
 
LLETSA said:
You crying again, Mr Experience? You never learn, it seems. I'm not going through it all again when our respective posting histories already show who came off worst on the previous occasions you chose to go down this road.

Other posters can make their own minds about that. It does seem though that rather than deal with fascists intimidating Asians in Keighley, all that concerns you is the deluded idea that you somehow won an argument based on ignoring fascists stirring up racial tensions in West Yorkshire and intimidating anyone who stands up to that.

LLETSA said:
Why not try addressing the issues for a change? For somebody who claims to be such a hardened class warrior you don't half get indignant about any criticism of your chosen brand of left-liberalism (albeit with archaic revolutionary rhetoric.) You are tiresomely repetitive with it, as well. Some imagination required in SWP HQ perhaps?

I have addressed the issue, but you choose to ignore the threat of fascists marching in West Yorkshire. The only time I get 'indignant' is at those more holier than thou making crass statements of something they nothing about.

LLETSA said:
I've never been to Tuscany. If you want to get personal, however, do the research: there are posts of mine where I referred to where I went on me hols, and I never even left this country. (Tell you what-if you find it, you can cut-and-paste it, like you do with everything else.) I've been to a lot of other places though, such as the ones you and I have argued about from time to time on other boards; arguments that showed up the inadequacy your substituting what the Sacred Texts of the Great Masters say for actually seeing things for yourself and drawing some conclusions. A lot of water has flowed under the bridge since the heyday of the failed Bolshevik experiment, tovarisch. Still, mantras can be comforting, I suppose.

It was a harmless bit of fun to wind you up LLETSA old boy. I coundn't give two hoots where you went to for your jollies. To be clear, I do see things for myself with some reading of history. Your conclusion about this issue is to ignore it.

LLETSA said:
Funny, too, that you, like so many of your fellow Robotrots, tend to throw out the 'teacher' accusations when you get frustrated by even the mildest of criticism of the dogmas that you hold most dear. You should know from other boards that this is something you share with plenty of the dullard far-right dogmatists, so many of whose traits you so unwittingly share (comes from being slaves to ideology): neither of you can genuninely accept the idea of any working class person who doesn't chant the approved recitations being able to articulate political opinions. Therefore thay must be 'teachers'. (It's always teachers; I wonder why....) However, I don't think half-term comes in the first two weeks of October anywhere (the period I was away), does it?

Nice bit of spin to a harmless piss-take LLETSA. Some of my best friends are teachers. I don't get frustrated by criticisms of dogma, nor am I a slave to any ideology. However, when someone replies to a post by saying:
Have you ever encountered a member of the WNP?
(have you?), then that is not about articulating a political opinion, but rather gearing up to take the piss (out of someone who appears to be committed to fighting fascism) which ironically is the one thing you can't deal with when it's thrown in your direction.
 
LLETSA said:
So much of a NF stronghold that the 'No Platform' SWP held meetings in the pub next door to theirs?

Some individuals drank there on a Saturday afternoon when no meetings took place. Unlike you, sat in your box at Man City, some anti-fascists took it upon themselves to make them feel unwelcome when the time was appropriate.
 
MC5 said:
Some individuals drank there on a Saturday afternoon when no meetings took place. Unlike you, sat in your box at Man City, some anti-fascists took it upon themselves to make them feel unwelcome when the time was appropriate.



More boasting about unverifiable events, I see MC5.

However, boasting about unverifiable events is merely the other side of your mindless cut-and-paste political hackery, innit?
 
MC5 said:
Other posters can make their own minds about that. It does seem though that rather than deal with fascists intimidating Asians in Keighley, all that concerns you is the deluded idea that you somehow won an argument based on ignoring fascists stirring up racial tensions in West Yorkshire and intimidating anyone who stands up to that.



I'm sure that you intend to enlighten us as to exactly how you've 'stood up' to fascists intimidating Asians and how they have in turn 'intimidated' you, MC5.
 
MC5 said:
. Your conclusion about this issue is to ignore it.



Nowhere on this thread do I advocate ignoring anything. You seem to be unable to distinguish between this thread and another one from a couple of months ago. Still, I know the pressure you must be under, facing the bastards down while they're intimidating Asians in the Three Legs.
 
LLETSA said:
More boasting about unverifiable events, I see MC5.

However, boasting about unverifiable events is merely the other side of your mindless cut-and-paste political hackery, innit?

I don't see that as boasting. Where's all this cut and paste political hackery you speak of?
 
MC5 said:
However, when someone replies to a post by saying: (have you?), then that is not about articulating a political opinion, but rather gearing up to take the piss (out of someone who appears to be committed to fighting fascism) which ironically is the one thing you can't deal with when it's thrown in your direction.



As I suspected-you seem to have gone to sleep it off for a bit. Best thing, if this gibberish is how it affects you. Have I ever encountered a member of the WNP? No. And I don't think many others have either. Which was precisely my point. As you might have been able to see had you removed that slice of fried potato from the shoulder of your denim waistcoat.
 
LLETSA said:
I'm sure that you intend to enlighten us as to exactly how you've 'stood up' to fascists intimidating Asians and how they have in turn 'intimidated' you, MC5.

Dewsbury town hall, ended up in a room where the NF were to meet with two elderly Asians and another anti-fascist.

I found out that fascists had been told told to target me if seen on the streets (it's what they do to opponents). A friend had her windows put through and a swastika was painted on her house. Another friend was attacked by a local fascist loon (a teacher), but unbeknown to him, someone else was with him at the time and saw the fascist off.
 
LLETSA said:
As I suspected-you seem to have gone to sleep it off for a bit. Best thing, if this gibberish is how it affects you. Have I ever encountered a member of the WNP? No. And I don't think many others have either. Which was precisely my point. As you might have been able to see had you removed that slice of fried potato from the shoulder of your denim waistcoat.

You might not have encountered these idiots in the leafy suburbs where you are, but in Leeds the fascist crazy gang that inhabit it's environs is out to cause problems in West Yorkshire before they hang their jackboots up.
 
All our yesterdays

MC5 said:
Dewsbury town hall, ended up in a room where the NF were to meet with two elderly Asians and another anti-fascist.

I found out that fascists had been told told to target me if seen on the streets (it's what they do to opponents). A friend had her windows put through and a swastika was painted on her house. Another friend was attacked by a local fascist loon (a teacher), but unbeknown to him, someone else was with him at the time and saw the fascist off.



And there was I, thinking you were talking about the here and now- you know, the very issue that the BNP are going on about, the central issue of their supposed demo on the 5th Nov? I thought you were going to tell me about how they were using it to victimise a whole community (which they are) and what you are doing about it-you know, avowedly being a man of action? Silly me. Imagine my disappointment to discover it's just another excuse for MC5 to take a walk down Memory Lane. (Is that a road in Leeds?)

Still, I suppose all your tales will be verified when the latest of Eamonn Andrews' successors shoves that red book into your hands, eh MC5? Now, I know youy keep jumping up with a 'Grrr! I'll show him a thing or two, the Man City supporting scoundrel!' and rushing over to the computer every time you try to get settled on the divan, but just try and blot out what I've said and you'll soon be able to sleep it off.
 
How can I argue with that?

MC5 said:
You might not have encountered these idiots in the leafy suburbs where you are, but in Leeds the fascist crazy gang that inhabit it's environs is out to cause problems in West Yorkshire before they hang their jackboots up.



Oh right then. I never looked at it like that before. You win.

After all, it must be hard for you, sneering at Eddie and Tony over the rim of your Mackeson glass.
 
LLETSA said:
...avowedly being a man of action? Silly me. Imagine my disappointment to discover it's just another excuse for MC5 to take a walk down Memory Lane. (Is that a road in Leeds?)

Working class history has been covered by many (not enough working-class class ones though), here's one that does mention a road in Leeds - that exists.

The Making of the English Working Class, by E.P. Thompson.

As for the 'action' bit? That is meant by the second letter of the R and A board you keep mentioning.
 
After the bombings It would have been quite easy for us to piss around holding mean-nothing peace marches with a few buisness owners

!!!!
 
Boo said:
After the bombings It would have been quite easy for us to piss around holding mean-nothing peace marches with a few buisness owners

!!!!

Oh no, this looks like I wrote it...was trying to demonstrate my astonishment at this analysis from red hippy - thought that peace marches were quite important in the wake of the bombings especially in Leeds...
 
Boo said:
Oh no, this looks like I wrote it...was trying to demonstrate my astonishment at this analysis from red hippy - thought that peace marches were quite important in the wake of the bombings especially in Leeds...

Yeah, I didn't mean to misrepresent the importance of community action after the bombings. However, my experience of being on one of these marches was that rather than being the beginning of a road towards the community fighting back against the backlash, they were built in an obstructive way.... subordinating what the majority of young people on the demos wanted to the pro-government objectives of the religious leaders and buisness owners who were on the demonstration (clerics ripping megaphones of young women and warning them 'I know your father blah blah' because they didn't like what they were chanting, standing in the way of organising very necesarry defence against the police and racists attacks) Anyways, bit of a de-rail... PM if you want to talk more about this.
 
Just had a brief search on the internet and this info came up. Do people know if it is accurate?

If it is it kind of brings into question whether an organisation who had a leading organiser who was a gang rapist and current members who take part in wife beating, terrorism and beating up a pensioner are best placed to take on the serious issue of child abuse. It's also interesting to read the searchlight article about one of the mums in Keighley who helped make the documentary exposing child abuse in Keighley. She slams the BNP for their cynical use of such a sensitive subject. As I said, they're sick fuckers.


From Searchlight

On Sunday 14 April 2002 was the day the tide turned in Oldham. BNP members woke up to a large feature in the Sunday Mirror exposing their leafleting organiser Robert Bennett as a convicted gang rapist and armed robber.

From Wikipedia:

While they claim any individuals involved with criminality would be immediately expelled from the BNP, Brian Turner, a Burnley local authority BNP councillor found guilty of attacking his wife and a police officer – has recently been told he will keep his job. Turner was arrested on February 5th 2005 at Cuthbert Street in Burnley, after reports of a domestic violence incident at a house in St Cuthbert Street, Burnley. The court was told at a previous hearing how Turner, who has 11 previous convictions, was aggressive towards the police officer who tried to restrain him, and kicked him in the leg.

Tony Lecomber, is a convicted bomber and racist attacker, almost killing a man on the London Underground. He was never expelled from the party, and is now the BNP's national development officer.

Paul Bennett, BNP council candidate for Barnsley (assaulting a pensioner.)
 
cockneyrebel said:
Just had a brief search on the internet and this info came up. Do people know if it is accurate?

If it is it kind of brings into question whether an organisation who had a leading organiser who was a gang rapist and current members who take part in wife beating, terrorism and beating up a pensioner are best placed to take on the serious issue of child abuse. It's also interesting to read the searchlight article about one of the mums in Keighley who helped make the documentary exposing child abuse in Keighley. She slams the BNP for their cynical use of such a sensitive subject. As I said, they're sick fuckers.


From Searchlight

On Sunday 14 April 2002 was the day the tide turned in Oldham. BNP members woke up to a large feature in the Sunday Mirror exposing their leafleting organiser Robert Bennett as a convicted gang rapist and armed robber.

From Wikipedia:

While they claim any individuals involved with criminality would be immediately expelled from the BNP, Brian Turner, a Burnley local authority BNP councillor found guilty of attacking his wife and a police officer – has recently been told he will keep his job. Turner was arrested on February 5th 2005 at Cuthbert Street in Burnley, after reports of a domestic violence incident at a house in St Cuthbert Street, Burnley. The court was told at a previous hearing how Turner, who has 11 previous convictions, was aggressive towards the police officer who tried to restrain him, and kicked him in the leg.

Tony Lecomber, is a convicted bomber and racist attacker, almost killing a man on the London Underground. He was never expelled from the party, and is now the BNP's national development officer.

Paul Bennett, BNP council candidate for Barnsley (assaulting a pensioner.)



Given that this kind of stuff has been used against them for years already, to little effect on their growth, why do you appear to assume that it's going to have any great effect now?
 
Given that this kind of stuff has been used against them for years already, to little effect on their growth, why do you appear to assume that it's going to have any great effect now?

I don't think it's a be all and end all factor that will stop the BNP. But I don't think it's a bad thing to point out that a group that has members who have been convicted for beating up a pensioner, abusing and beating their wife and terrorism aren't the best people to deal with the issue of child abuse.

I also think that the stuff about the woman who helped make the documentary is damaging to the BNP.

And I doubt it helped their campaign in Oldham when it was revealed that one of their main organisers was a gang rapist. Hardly fits in with the family friendly image they're trying to promote.

I do think this kind of thing could make some people think twice about getting involved in the BNP, even if in and of itself it won't stop them growing.
 
a spoon full of sugar.............

Oldham
Far right runs Lib Dem candidate close

Candidate fails by 91 votes after recount

Helen Carter
Friday May 3, 2002
The Guardian

The far-right British National party came within a handful of votes of winning a council seat in Oldham last night, less than a year after the town was hit by racially motivated riots.

After a recount in St James ward, it emerged that the BNP candidate, Roy Goodwin, a local businessman, had polled 929 votes, 91 less than the winning Liberal Democrat, James McArdle, who had 1,020. Labour were forced into third place with 599 votes.

A sigh of relief could be heard among the mainstream parties as the BNP failed to win any seats, though they still received a total of 4,391 votes across the town.

Amid the concern over the BNP, it was hardly noticed that the Liberal Democrats had lost overall control of the council, ending with 29 seats. Labour gained four seats, finishing with 28.

The BNP came second in Chadderton South, which was held by Labour. Here, the Conservatives were forced into third place and the Liberal Democrats came fourth.

Always read the manufacturers advice when taking medicine.
 
I'll be working next door to the City Art Gallery on Tuesday and Wednesday of next week. So will be right on the spot for anti-fash demo as well
 
cockneyrebel said:
I don't think it's a be all and end all factor that will stop the BNP. But I don't think it's a bad thing to point out that a group that has members who have been convicted for beating up a pensioner, abusing and beating their wife and terrorism aren't the best people to deal with the issue of child abuse.

I also think that the stuff about the woman who helped make the documentary is damaging to the BNP.

And I doubt it helped their campaign in Oldham when it was revealed that one of their main organisers was a gang rapist. Hardly fits in with the family friendly image they're trying to promote.

I do think this kind of thing could make some people think twice about getting involved in the BNP, even if in and of itself it won't stop them growing.
I agree - LLETSA surely you can't deny that where the BNP are going after the law+order vote, or an anti-rapist vote, showing their organisers as criminals or rapists isn't going to help them!
 
Back
Top Bottom