Aye, they seem a decent bunch & so far the only ones given the boot was an angry troll and a serial returner (who snuck in and wasn't an actual AV bod).
You're overstepping the mark here.
Much as you may like to as the UK is signatory to a number of international conventions concerning people claiming asylum they cannot just be deported once they have claimed asylum. There is a process. The Home Office has to look seriously at their claim and I can tell you the following nationals stand a high probability of being granted asylum: Syrians, because their country is a war zone, likewise Sudan. Eritrea because it is an extremely repressive dictatorship with widespread documented human rights abuses. Iran if the person claims and can reasonably prove to be a christian or if they are gay. During the course of an asylum claim the person claiming asylum has an initial screening interview and then, eventually a substantive interview which goes into detail as to why they should be granted leave to remain. Often because the person has no documentation NOT because they have been told to destroy it as claimed by that Migration Watch website and the Telegraph but because they have had it taken from them at some point by traffickers/smugglers OR they never had any in the first place, during the course of the main interview the Home Office will seek to ascertain if the person is, indeed where they claim to be from. They will ask the national currency of their country of origin, they will ask for well-known landmarks in the areas of the country they claim to be from. I know this for a fact because I have attended a number of these interviews.There has been quite a lot of talk about it and it makes absolute sense as they can't be deported because they don't know where to send them to. There's many reasons why people arrive without documentation and destroying it en route is one of them. No agenda, no prejudice, just a fact.
Almost all Channel migrants arrive without passports after being told to shred ID
Only 317 of 16,510 people making crossing had passports when picked up by Border Force, according to Home Office datawww.telegraph.co.uk
What happens to failed asylum seekers?
Thousands of migrants are trying to cross the Channel to the UK. But for those denied refugee status, what happens?www.bbc.co.uk
Most Dublin Airport asylum applicants arrived without a passport
Almost 70% of people who applied for international protection at Dublin Airport in 2023 arrived without a correct identity document, figures supplied by the Department of Justice to Prime Time show.www.rte.ie
Minus 18 years.All this drama and animosity over showing empathy for some people who have been killed, one of them being an eighteen year old girl with her whole life ahead of her
Clearly the portion of her life ahead of her was vastly less than that behindAll this drama and animosity over showing empathy for some people who have been killed, one of them being an eighteen year old girl with her whole life ahead of her
All this drama and animosity over showing empathy for some people who have been killed, one of them being an eighteen year old girl with her whole life ahead of her
To put it mildly! They’re not the only one! Surely warrants a ban, using that language to another poster!
Comments were posted about the reaction on here to the yacht tragedy and yet other posters have turned it into a discussion on migrants, so perhaps direct the last sentence of your post to them?
Have a fucking word with yourself. You were the original derailer of the thread posting that dodgy Migration Watch link.
Ah... I see you're one of those who starts calling for bans whenever someone says something you don't like.
Not true- read back through the posts! As a result I was asked to provide a link.
No, something untrue, abusive and inflammatory that the poster wouldn’t dare saying to my face!Ah... I see you're one of those who starts calling for bans whenever someone says something you don't like.
This is a wind-up, surely?
I fucking would (unless you’re dead hard or summat)
Possibly, but you'll probably hear worse before you leave.
Perhaps if it was a literal claim
Does it matter?
Yes, you made an unevidenced claim that asylum seekers destroy their documentation prior to arrival, were called out on it then provided a link to a website with a dodgy agenda in an attempt to back up your claim. Take. Your. Obvious. Bias. To. An. Appropriate. Thread. Or preferably fuck the fuck off.
He was a billionaire!
I hinted at it with the Darktrace thing, and while I'm still on the side of freak accidents the eyebrow is twitching here. Being treated as manslaughter now.
It probably does to whomever is the main beneficiary of his will.
The thread went off course at #536. Re read the posts!
Nah, it's all irrelevant, none of it matters.
krtek a houby post is entirely relevant to the thread, drawing attention to the fact that the death of a very rich man gets far more reportage that the many deaths of refugees at sea. Conversely many of your replies are completely off-topic and displaying an obvious agenda namely xenophobia/racism.
Supernanna is and the other fella has just popped up, seemingly just to back their pal up
And it was pointed out why that was and it ended up being a discussion in migration.Please do not accuse me of racism because I provided links that you didn't like!
