Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Berlin bans Airbnb apartment rentals to protect affordable housing

editor

hiraethified
Interesting development:

Berlin has banned tourists from renting entire apartments through Airbnb and its competitors in an attempt to protect affordable housing.

With the help of large fines, the German city's authorities are hoping to protect the property supply and keep rents as low as possible.

After the success of the various online rental portals, the number of properties available for long-term rental periods had fallen markedly

But from 1 May, the new law entitled "Zweckentfremdungsverbot" bans the short-term let of entire apartments to tourists without a city permit.
You won't be able to rent an Airbnb apartment in Berlin for much longer
 
Last edited:
Greebo and I found this out last week, as the building we've stayed in since 2008 can no longer do short-stay (under 2 months) rentals. A bummer that will make staying in Berlin more expensive. :(
We stayed in an Airbnb when we were in Berlin too but I can see why they're doing this.
 
We stayed in an Airbnb when we were in Berlin too but I can see why they're doing this.

Absolutely. Not only were ordinary rental prices climbing, but speculators and developers were buying up leases and then attempting to redevelop standard housing en masse into holiday lets.

Frankly, the only reason I'm a bit narked is that most stuff advertised on Airbnb and the likes of Mowitania is pretty well-informed regarding accessibility for disabled people, whereas hotels and pensions are a bit more wishy-washy - we've seen some advertising "step-free access" on the basis of "only having 5 steps", etc.
 
Buy a house, rent all the rooms out for a couple of hundred a night. profit. what could possibly go wrong.
Fuck Airbnb.
 
its just turning everyone into buy to let landlords who are charging as much for a room for a night or 2 as the weekly rent on the property should be.
New Orleans has been going mad about this for a while, people buying up multiple properties, renting the rooms out for massive sums, killing the neighbourhoods, sound familiar?
 
It doesn't stop you staying with Berliners, arguably more fun :p
Try again. My type of health limitation makes it potentially dangerous to share a kitchen. Going psychotic in the throes of a migraine triggered by their cooking or preparation or use of onions is not more fun than staying somewhere with the kitchen to myself.
 
I'm stumbling at the first step there.
This is apparently a big problem in places like San Francisco and other rapidly gentrifying cities. You have to remember that people will find novel ways to make money beyond the intended purpose of a particular platform. Ebay started out as a platform for folks to sell collectables, antiques and whatever they wanted to get rid of. Now something like 80% of their listings are new items. Etsy has similarly deviated from it's original stated purpose and actual crafters are competing with importers. So Air BNB might be ok if it was just people renting out spare rooms, but it's not hard to see how someone can make a lot of money opening a mini hotel (sans staff and the usual overhead) in a city that is already very expensive to live in and visit.
 
But that's not a Good Thing though.
Just for once, I'm going to be selfish and say that as far as I'm concerned it wouldn't the worst thing which TTIP could allow to happen.

As explained before, finding a suitable hotel anywhere (including the UK) is well nigh impossible, hostels are unsuitable because of VP's need for quiet (because of his ME), caravan parks and similar tend to be even less accessible, and the type of holiday flat VP and I have used before has been the least bad option. The place which we most recently stayed in was on Mowitania, but also on air BnB.

We used the local supermarkets, pharmacies, launderette, offies, newsagents, and bakeries. We didn't make a nuisance of ourselves, and we weren't partying hard on anyone's doorstep. The flat in which we stayed had very limited sunlight on only one side and IMHO you really couldn't live there long term without your health suffering (in deep shade at the bottom of a courtyard) but it was more than good enough for a short stay.

Since the change in rules, it's no longer rentable for less than 62 nights, so we can't go back without either paying well over the odds to leave the place empty for more than half the time booked, or making an arrangement with others to stay in the place for the weeks we won't be there.

The landlady, (who lives in the same block with her children, and has done for several years) suffers, and one more place which was disabled accessible (and suitable for people with allergies) falls out of use. I'm struggling to see who might gain from this change; even refugees would probably not want to be housed for long in somewhere with so little natural light (and no possibility of improving that, because of the type of building).
 
Just for once, I'm going to be selfish and say that as far as I'm concerned it wouldn't the worst thing which TTIP could allow to happen

My point, which I'm sure you understand, is that TTIP would also allow far worse things to happen.
 
My point, which I'm sure you understand, is that TTIP would also allow far worse things to happen.

I know a guy who thinks TTIP will be a great thing. It was one of those chaotic nights and I really wanted to quiz him on why but I didn't have time...
 
Back
Top Bottom