ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
Lukehurst, apologist for Zionism and shill for neoliberalism. A total arsehole.
And bitter with it
He's not very well-endowed with reflexivity, is he?
Lukehurst, apologist for Zionism and shill for neoliberalism. A total arsehole.
And bitter with it
What am I? I'm a socialist inside an increasingly bourgeosified workers party with neoliberal, anti-working class elements in the leadership. There needs to be much more serious thought given to the conditions under which an effective left break from Labour can sustain itself as a viable vehicle. The electoral system is a major impediment. Even AV could have begun to generate a progressive dynamic. But we're pretty much stuck with what we've got. So there has to be maximum attention paid to making the anti-austerity case to Labour voters, and building forces for a full scale battle against Labour cuts post-2015.
And of course Labour are the natural rallying-point for anti-cuts activism, given what Balls has already said on the subject, and given what Labour councils have already passed in terms of cuts.
1h Ian McNeill @McNeill56
@OwenJones84 You still think the best thing for the Scots is to vote no to independence given your views on the Labour party in Scotland?
1h Owen Jones @OwenJones84
@McNeill56 Nationalism is not a substitute for class politics
But note a hard left Labour candidate would alienate more 2nd prefs from Lib Dems and other confused souls than the extra it would gain from the Greens' 2nd prefs (which are fairly automatic). In 2008 and 2012 it's been an automatic 'vote Labour 2nd Pref' from Green HQ. No iffing and butting about it. All London Assembly people are Labour centrists - Labour left has made no headway.
Typical Nu Labour type tbh.He's not very well-endowed with reflexivity, is he?
The Assembly candidates are no more centrist than any other set of Labour candidates - if anything some are marginally left leaning (Murad Qureshi, Tom Copley etc) - certainly isn't an argument against preferential voting systems (note that the Irish have a significantly better left representation under STV than we have over here).
out of curiosity, what do you do within labour to campaign for better left representation within that nefandous party?The Assembly candidates are no more centrist than any other set of Labour candidates - if anything some are marginally left leaning (Murad Qureshi, Tom Copley etc) - certainly isn't an argument against preferential voting systems (note that the Irish have a significantly better left representation under STV than we have over here).
The syriziation of the middle class left continues apace.In the context of Owen's argument, John Palmer's recent article for the RP website is worth a read:
http://www.redpepper.org.uk/facing-reality-after-the-crisis-in-the-swp/
Ability to influence that is very limited, beyond NEC elections. Best option is to press unions to use their influence to block Blairite candidates and promote people with some kind of class instinct and backboneout of curiosity, what do you do within labour to campaign for better left representation within that nefandous party?
What's happening here is that some people from the far-left are hoping for a Syrizia style umbrella to work in. It's about realising their hopes and needs, not something that's coming as a response to a working class demand or building organically out of anti-cuts campaigning.You don't think that a substantial section of the working class would welcome the emergence of a broad anti-austerity formation like Syriza here?
The middle class left licking their lips at owen and sensing a new leading role for themselves would for sure.You don't think that a substantial section of the working class would welcome the emergence of a broad anti-austerity formation like Syriza here?
I for one look forward to Welsh and Scottish activists rushing to embrace an Owen Jones network whose author's whose main idea is:
Yes, call on the unions to do something. The unions that are instinctively left-wing. Comes the reply: the leaders might be a prop of labour flavoured neo-liberalism, the members aren't, we must call on them to pressure the leaders to pressure the labour leaders. (of course, this say that there is no possibility of influencing the labour leadership from within the party - so bang goes the main argument for staying in, but that will be ignored). And there's yet another step, when it's pointed out that union members don't really care about and are not on the whole involved in this political stuff the next thing to do is pressure them to get involved in order to pressure the reps to pressure the leaders to pressure the labour leaders. I love this participatory democracy stuff.Ability to influence that is very limited, beyond NEC elections. Best option is to press unions to use their influence to block Blairite candidates and promote people with some kind of class instinct and backbone
Is the beige trilby standard SWP sartorial statement?
Fedora. A Trilby has a much skimpier brim.
It's a mid-life crisis fedora.
Typical Nu Labour type tbh.
The Assembly candidates are no more centrist than any other set of Labour candidates - if anything some are marginally left leaning (Murad Qureshi, Tom Copley etc) - certainly isn't an argument against preferential voting systems (note that the Irish have a significantly better left representation under STV than we have over here).
You don't think that a substantial section of the working class would welcome the emergence of a broad anti-austerity formation like Syriza here?