ATOMIC SUPLEX
Member Since: 1985 Post Count: 3
Great review here. This guy is great.
Haha that guy is great!
And right. I don't think I can ever really fault his critique. His crazy voice is slipping though, he sounded half normal in some of that review.
Watched this at the weekend. On acid. It was a pretty spectacular way to spend three hours; totally predictable but a joy to behold nonetheless.
And it was sold out - I was expecting to be sat in a practically empty cinema I'd left it so long, how long has it been out now? Still packing the theatres.
Palestinian activists take 'Avatar' analogy to heart: LA Times
The Razzies were last night
I have bought Razzle for many years, is it even still on sale?
Me too. All too often the Oscars have sucked up to populist bullshit (see Cameron's previous effort about the boat that sinks). Good to see this year they have decided box office takings and aggressive PR campaigning by News International does not equate artistic merit.
Very happy Avatar didn't win big last night!
Me too. All too often the Oscars have sucked up to populist bullshit (see Cameron's previous effort about the boat that sinks). Good to see this year they have decided box office takings and aggressive PR campaigning by News International does not equate artistic merit.
It won what it should have won -- technical awards. The script and the plot left something to be desired, but the art direction and CGI was fab.
I didn't think the CGI was that great, there were times where it looked fairly average and the less said about some of the animation the better.
I didn't think the CGI was that great, there were times where it looked fairly average and the less said about some of the animation the better.
I didn't think the CGI was that great, there were times where it looked fairly average and the less said about some of the animation the better.
It won what it should have won -- technical awards. The script and the plot left something to be desired, but the art direction and CGI was fab.
How can anyone say that the CGI in Avatar was anything other that phenomenal!?
it should never have won the cinematography award - cinematography requires cameras, not computers
It's the best out there right now. In a year or two's time, though, it will look silly. That's the trouble with trying for photorealistic CGI, it ages very badly.
It's the best out there right now. In a year or two's time, though, it will look silly. That's the trouble with trying for photorealistic CGI, it ages very badly.
it should never have won the cinematography award - cinematography requires cameras, not computers