as I was moving to NI stamps only so basically couldn't be coerced
I was in wrag for a year and had to attend two interviews at the job centre. (then they told me there wouldn't be any more as I was moving to NI stamps only so basically couldn't be coerced )
(My emphases)
So you were in WRAG for a year but not on IR-ESA? Have I got that right?
(Apologies for tugging at this, it's confusing me).
I suspect that you were put in the W-RA group because the decision-maker is ambivalent about your brain injury, so they've put you in the group where they can reassess you the easiest.
It makes sense in its own way, but doesn't appear to be answering the question I asked!
I give up -- more a reflection on my dwindling energy than on you.
It makes sense in its own way, but doesn't appear to be answering the question I asked!
I give up -- more a reflection on my dwindling energy than on you.
A Department for Work and Pensions spokesman said: “Our sympathy goes out to Mrs Wootton’s family. A decision on whether someone is well enough to work is taken following a thorough assessment and after consideration of all supporting medical evidence.”
Linda also appealed but was rejected despite her history.
Linda’s was at a test centre in Southend, eight miles from her home in Rayleigh, Essex, on January 3. “She couldn’t even drive herself because she kept feeling faint,” said Peter, who was not allowed in to support her.
The normal shite. Suppose she didn't supply enough letters from doctors/consultantsA Department for Work and Pensions spokesman said: “Our sympathy goes out to Mrs Wootton’s family. A decision on whether someone is well enough to work is taken following a thorough assessment and after consideration of all supporting medical evidence.”
<snip>The normal shite. Suppose she didn't support enough letters from doctors/consultants
I had a look at the FAQ and it didn't seem to specify whether "attend the programme" means "go to pointless interviews" or "stack shelves in Poundland"
The normal shite. Suppose she didn't supply enough letters from doctors/consultants
I think we've seen enough evidence that even when you supply whatever you can the DWP ignores it anyway.
How true is this? How viable?
It made me cry thinking about how fucked up that is.
[limiting GP appointments] is one of a number of options grassroots members were asked to look at in a consultation document, Local Health Discussion Brief, posted on the Conservative Policy Forum (CPF) website last night.
Among them were whether GPs should take greater responsibility for out of hours care in their area - something Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt addressed earlier this week - and if seeing a GP for a routine appointment in the evening or at the weekend is a luxury the country cannot afford.
The CPF describes itself as a national party group that gives members the opportunity to discuss the major policy challenges facing Britain and is chaired by Cabinet Office Minister Oliver Letwin.
Health experts reacted angrily to the suggestions, according to the Independent on Sunday. [...more]
Don't stress just yet -- it's a Tory thinktank proposal that has already annoyed the healthcare pros. I sincerely doubt it has a chance of making it as far as policy.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/10081220/Conservatives-consider-limit-on-GP-visits.html
Best to try and nip these things in the bud as best as we can.
https://secure.38degrees.org.uk/page/s/dont-cap-GP-visits#petition
Don't stress just yet -- it's a Tory thinktank proposal that has already annoyed the healthcare pros. I sincerely doubt it has a chance of making it as far as policy.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/10081220/Conservatives-consider-limit-on-GP-visits.html
Among them were whether GPs should take greater responsibility for out of hours care in their area - something Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt addressed earlier this week - and if seeing a GP for a routine appointment in the evening or at the weekend is a luxury the country cannot afford.
Quite agree -- will sign the petition in a moment.
ETA: Duly signed.
Strikes me as this is the same 'liontamer's whip' crap that NuLab tried -- float a really wankerish idea, then slip through something slightly less offensive once all the original fuss has died down.