Barking_Mad
Non sibi sed omnibus
Boil Lance.
Boils on his lance!
Boil Lance.
Rabobank will end its sponsorship of both the men’s and the women’s professional cycling teams per 31 December 2012. Rabobank will continue its ties with amateur cycling as a sponsor, including the youth training and the cyclocross team.
Rabobank has come to this decision following publication of the report from the American doping authority USADA last week. This report speaks volumes. Bert Bruggink, member of the Managing Board: “It is with pain in our heart, but for the bank this is an inevitable decision. We are no longer convinced that the international professional world of cycling can make this a clean and fair sport. We are not confident that this will change for the better in the foreseeable future.”
Very true. Do sponsors have their own association?Its this kind of pressure that has the most influence in cycling and IMHO its this kind of action that is the only action that can shift McQuaid and Verbruggen quickly (how are they still there?!?), corporate sponsors figure on their fatcat radars in a way fans, riders' health or morality do not.
It's a tricky question. I wonder how much of sport has been tarnished with either drug-taking, or match-fixing, and maybe we don't actually want to know exactly.But...but...but..Lance did so much for the sport!!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/ot...0801/Team-Sky-braced-departures.html?ITO=1490
Anyone any idea of which Sky rider/staffer being referred to in that article? Can't be Yates, because the accusee insists they never tested positive.
Mick Rodgers? Reckons his involvement with Ferrari was for 'training plans', that most worn of old chestnuts and non defence to boot. He must be top of the list? And how can DB still have Yatesy on the staff and keep a straight face.
Very true. Do sponsors have their own association?
For years, Connie and Daniel Roddy did all they could to support Livestrong, raising tens of thousands of dollars for the cancer charity founded by cyclist Lance Armstrong."It all started when Lance's first book came out," Connie Roddy said, referring to the 2001 publication of "It's Not About the Bike: My Journey Back to Life," which details Armstrong's bout with testicular cancer. "I read it cover to cover. I was just so taken by who he said he was."The Roddys, who live in Santa Monica, California, say they initially gave $50,000 to the foundation. In 2003, Connie Roddy said, she helped organize an event for the foundation at a health club that raised an additional $150,000.Now they want their money back."I feel we were really fooled. We were really hoodwinked," she said.
criticism poured in from some of the charity's donors.Former Livestrong donor Michael Birdsong of Salt Lake City is among them. "The charity was established and publicized and got their funds based on a fraud," he said.Birdsong said he was attracted to the organization after his wife -- an avid cyclist -- was diagnosed with breast cancer in 1998, about the time Armstrong won his first Tour de France title."She found his story very inspiring," he said. "Before we read his book, she would work all day, go to radiation treatments and go riding because that made her feel good."In 2007, the couple "became part of the public face of the foundation," said Birdsong, a software engineer. "I was one of the people who would answer questions from people to raise money."Though he had long been aware of Armstrong's alleged drug use, he said he didn't believe it. "I was a huge Armstrong fan from 1999 to the time he retired; I would defend him from anyone."But, as his involvement with Livestrong grew, "I started to ask what are they doing with all this money they are raising?"The foundation's IRS filing last year reported more than $100 million in net assets or fund balances.The organization spent $2.1 million in compensation to its seven highest-paid officers and three employees, according to the IRS form. No member of the board, whose members include CNN Chief Medical Correspondent Dr. Sanjay Gupta, was compensated, it said.Now, Birdsong said, he feels disillusioned. "The whole thing is founded on a lie. The guy cheated, and he forced other people to cheat. I would like my money back. We donated under false pretenses."
They are honouring the contract financially though - the team will be financed for next year but bear 'white label' sponsorship...they just want their name disconnected with cycling.
Which is probably the most damning statement of all.
"The important thing for us now is to build a team that satisfies the UCI, so we can apply for a license,"
On what he called a "landmark day for cycling", the Irishman, who became president of UCI in 2006, said he would not be resigning.