Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Apparently, Feminism is dead!!!

It was supposed to be a dig by extension at Ashley Cole, as I rarely pass up an opportunity to ridicule the little bollocks, but I can see it's failed.

My bad, presumably.
 
What's a slow handclap signify? If you want to make a point spit it out.

Otherwise stop saying a woman made a bad life choice cos her fucking HUSBAND kept playing away from home! Bloody men.

It's failed badly.
 
So your problem with Cheryl is that she's done well by playing men at their own game?
I don't want to put words into anyone else's mouth but my thoughts are that she has not played men at their own game. She has done well in part by playing the role of male fantasy which is not the same thing at all. The choices she has made have advanced her own position but have done nothing to advance the position of women in society. I don't think she is personally responsible for damaging the position of women in society.

Going back to something that really annoyed me earlier in this thread, there is no contradiction between a women working as a stripper or prostitute and her being a feminist. But that is not the same thing as claiming her work is a act of feminism which advances the cause of women.
 
I'm some kind of ill-defined leftist but my job does nothing whatsoever to advance leftist causes. I wasn't saying she or anybody else had to advance feminism in her job, I was merely pointing out the ridiculousness of trying to claim that she was a strong female role model. It really does stretch credibility to breaking point. What's next, we say that Miss World is a bastion of female emancipation? Or are we back to the preposterous notion of Thatcher as a feminist?

Other than that, what emanymton said.
 
What kind of job *would* be an 'act of feminism'? Out of interest.
Good point, very few. To me being a feminist like being a socialist is something you do within the framework of the job (and sometimes more outside your job) rather than the job itself being feminist or socialist. There is therefore scope for women working in the sex industry (never been completely happy with the term but don't know of another) to act as a feminist but not through her actual work.
 
I said she was a strong female role model, cos I think she is. She's done well for herself, if you check out her videos she's always in control of the men, she looks cracking and she left Ashley despite loving him.
 
Mainly because of #469
Please point out anywhere in 5 years of posting I may have given the impression that I would give anyone an easy time for holding a meeting in a strip club. To be honest, I'm actually quite insulted.
 
I said she was a strong female role model, cos I think she is. She's done well for herself, if you check out her videos she's always in control of the men, she looks cracking and she left Ashley despite loving him.
Her videos are a work of fiction. Is it a work of fiction written by men about male fantasy and directed by men, I wonder?
 
Is Miss World a strong female role model?

Is Thatcher a strong female role model?

What do we mean by those words?
 
I'm some kind of ill-defined leftist but my job does nothing whatsoever to advance leftist causes. I wasn't saying she or anybody else had to advance feminism in her job, I was merely pointing out the ridiculousness of trying to claim that she was a strong female role model. It really does stretch credibility to breaking point. What's next, we say that Miss World is a bastion of female emancipation? Or are we back to the preposterous notion of Thatcher as a feminist?

Other than that, what emanymton said.
Or me I would define myself as a socialist but I have ended up working for a bank, the only really connection between my work and my politics is in my role as a union rep.
 
Good point, very few. To me being a feminist like being a socialist is something you do within the framework of the job (and sometimes more outside your job) rather than the job itself being feminist or socialist. There is therefore scope for women working in the sex industry (never been completely happy with the term but don't know of another) to act as a feminist but not through her actual work.
Grr did not mean to like that lol.

Well thanks for telling me that sex work can't be empowering. Appreciate that.
 
Please point out anywhere in 5 years of posting I may have given the impression that I would give anyone an easy time for holding a meeting in a strip club. To be honest, I'm actually quite insulted.
Then clarify what you meant by that post.
 
Grr did not mean to like that lol.

Well thanks for telling me that sex work can't be empowering. Appreciate that.
How did you mean it?
And my thoughts are not to well worked out in my own head but I think there can a difference between something that is empowering to an individual women and something that advances the cause of women as a whole. I would imagine Thatcher felt very empowered but she did nothing to help other women.
 
I made a point about feminism, not about Cheryl Cole.
But you did so in a discussion that came out of a specific criticism of Cheryl Cole, in the context of a completely different argument. And that changing of context is, to be honest, half the problem here.
 
Grr did not mean to like that lol.

Well thanks for telling me that sex work can't be empowering. Appreciate that.
It's fine as long as you point out that no work can be empowering. And wait for them to tell you what work *is* empowering.
 
But you did so in a discussion that came out of a specific criticism of Cheryl Cole, in the context of a completely different argument. And that changing of context is, to be honest, half the problem here.
Sod Cheryl Cole. You said:

You do realise that the whole point of feminism was to try to create the situation in which a woman had worth other than just as a sex object, right? And that objectification is bad both prima facie and also for the way that encourages a mode of thought for which the value of women generally becomes degraded?

And everything I've said to you is in *that* context, not whatever you were discussing with Edie about Cheryl Cole.
 
How the state's Business, Innovation and Skills Committee is proceeding with its new inquiry into "Women in the Workplace"

http://www.publications.parliament....ct/cmbis/writev/womeninworkplace/contents.htm


The head of mostly women's business organisation 30% Club (company chairs voluntarily committed to bringing more women on company boards) is quite explicit about the drive for more women on boards "I am doing it because I believe that there will be better boards and better investment returns not just for me but for the economy. If companies choose to be listed here, they should respect the infrastructure of the country in which they are listed." (Oral evidence 23 July 2012)


According to the annual review of the Davies report on workplace inequalities, the number of women on FTSE boards is increasing now at 15.5% compared to 12%, 2 years ago. The basic idea behind this liberalism is that once it reaches 30% it will be enough momentum for it to snowball to be close to 50%, without the use of quotas.
Once this happens apparently the structural inequalities (under 4% of pilots women, 75% of cabin crew women) will be put right. So it's a lo-ong evolutionary road for workplace male-female equality, even before you take into account issues over maternity and pregnancy.
 
Hmm, feminist jobs, eh? Not sure if I'd qualify. I hope that a good part of my work involves enhancing the emotional wellbeing of women and children, which is indirectly (and sometimes directly) empowering, and I very much keep my clothes on (in fact I'd be removed from premises pretty sharpish if I didn't :eek:). But then it's also a caring role and therefore as gender typed as you get. So meh.

Maybe I should become an actuary. I knows Mrs Kabbes does it but it doesn't strike me as a particularly female dominated profession ;)

Edit: or maybe the serious part of this post is that many feminists also fit certain feminine, gender typed ideals, and whilst I would be :hmm: at the idea of Cheryl being hailed a feminist icon, where do we start to draw the line? There's somethIng a bit dodgy about making clear rules for the club.
 
Her explanation is getting things mixed up. Neoliberalism - the collapse in the rate of profit - is the steam-roller that is now forcing single mothers with young kids to seek work or lose benefits etc.
It's capitalism that forces women back to work after 6 months post-partum - not an effect of feminism. These things aren't effects of the feminist movement - intended or unintended.

The fight for work has been a feminist campaign far longer than since the 1970s, it had to be fought in the early Edwardian era to allow women entry into even the limited number of professions.
Also the women who you describe will always be at the mercy of their potentially abusive male husbands, if they remain dependent on them.

Fay Weldon is - now - either an extreme liberal feminist or not a feminist at all. She fairly recently proposed sterilising all women until they reached the age of 20.


Fay Weldon is a self-important windbag.
 
Back
Top Bottom