mattie
missing in inaction
Prick. She's no ones ex wife. Is Ashley just Cheryl's ex husband?
And fuck off with blaming her for Ashley's behaviour.
*slow handclap*
Prick. She's no ones ex wife. Is Ashley just Cheryl's ex husband?
And fuck off with blaming her for Ashley's behaviour.
Why?*slow handclap*
Why?
Yep, I don't really know why you suddenly popped up on the thread to take a pop at Cheryl Cole tbh.Really?
What's a slow handclap signify? If you want to make a point spit it out.*slow handclap*
What's a slow handclap signify? If you want to make a point spit it out.
Otherwise stop saying a woman made a bad life choice cos her fucking HUSBAND kept playing away from home! Bloody men.
I don't want to put words into anyone else's mouth but my thoughts are that she has not played men at their own game. She has done well in part by playing the role of male fantasy which is not the same thing at all. The choices she has made have advanced her own position but have done nothing to advance the position of women in society. I don't think she is personally responsible for damaging the position of women in society.So your problem with Cheryl is that she's done well by playing men at their own game?
And did anyone claim her job was 'an act of feminism' at all?What kind of job *would* be an 'act of feminism'? Out of interest.
Good point, very few. To me being a feminist like being a socialist is something you do within the framework of the job (and sometimes more outside your job) rather than the job itself being feminist or socialist. There is therefore scope for women working in the sex industry (never been completely happy with the term but don't know of another) to act as a feminist but not through her actual work.What kind of job *would* be an 'act of feminism'? Out of interest.
I though you did in the post I quoted to be honest.And did anyone claim her job was 'an act of feminism' at all?
Please point out anywhere in 5 years of posting I may have given the impression that I would give anyone an easy time for holding a meeting in a strip club. To be honest, I'm actually quite insulted.Mainly because of #469
Her videos are a work of fiction. Is it a work of fiction written by men about male fantasy and directed by men, I wonder?I said she was a strong female role model, cos I think she is. She's done well for herself, if you check out her videos she's always in control of the men, she looks cracking and she left Ashley despite loving him.
Or me I would define myself as a socialist but I have ended up working for a bank, the only really connection between my work and my politics is in my role as a union rep.I'm some kind of ill-defined leftist but my job does nothing whatsoever to advance leftist causes. I wasn't saying she or anybody else had to advance feminism in her job, I was merely pointing out the ridiculousness of trying to claim that she was a strong female role model. It really does stretch credibility to breaking point. What's next, we say that Miss World is a bastion of female emancipation? Or are we back to the preposterous notion of Thatcher as a feminist?
Other than that, what emanymton said.
Grr did not mean to like that lol.Good point, very few. To me being a feminist like being a socialist is something you do within the framework of the job (and sometimes more outside your job) rather than the job itself being feminist or socialist. There is therefore scope for women working in the sex industry (never been completely happy with the term but don't know of another) to act as a feminist but not through her actual work.
I made a point about feminism, not about Cheryl Cole.I though you did in the post I quoted to be honest.
Then clarify what you meant by that post.Please point out anywhere in 5 years of posting I may have given the impression that I would give anyone an easy time for holding a meeting in a strip club. To be honest, I'm actually quite insulted.
How did you mean it?Grr did not mean to like that lol.
Well thanks for telling me that sex work can't be empowering. Appreciate that.
But you did so in a discussion that came out of a specific criticism of Cheryl Cole, in the context of a completely different argument. And that changing of context is, to be honest, half the problem here.I made a point about feminism, not about Cheryl Cole.
It's fine as long as you point out that no work can be empowering. And wait for them to tell you what work *is* empowering.Grr did not mean to like that lol.
Well thanks for telling me that sex work can't be empowering. Appreciate that.
I think it's as clear as I can make it here and now. I have no time for expansion, hence the short and pithy posts.Then clarify what you meant by that post.
Sod Cheryl Cole. You said:But you did so in a discussion that came out of a specific criticism of Cheryl Cole, in the context of a completely different argument. And that changing of context is, to be honest, half the problem here.
You do realise that the whole point of feminism was to try to create the situation in which a woman had worth other than just as a sex object, right? And that objectification is bad both prima facie and also for the way that encourages a mode of thought for which the value of women generally becomes degraded?
Her explanation is getting things mixed up. Neoliberalism - the collapse in the rate of profit - is the steam-roller that is now forcing single mothers with young kids to seek work or lose benefits etc.
It's capitalism that forces women back to work after 6 months post-partum - not an effect of feminism. These things aren't effects of the feminist movement - intended or unintended.
The fight for work has been a feminist campaign far longer than since the 1970s, it had to be fought in the early Edwardian era to allow women entry into even the limited number of professions.
Also the women who you describe will always be at the mercy of their potentially abusive male husbands, if they remain dependent on them.
Fay Weldon is - now - either an extreme liberal feminist or not a feminist at all. She fairly recently proposed sterilising all women until they reached the age of 20.