teuchter
je suis teuchter
Good. They too should be encouraged to use public transport.Staff have to pay for parking too.
Good. They too should be encouraged to use public transport.Staff have to pay for parking too.
Good. They too should be encouraged to use public transport.
So people should only be encouraged to use public transport in London.In London that's fine. Out in the real world, not so much.
And that is a perfectly valid viewpointPeople vote for the Conservatives. So that invalidates all arguments as to why it would be better if the Conservatives weren't in power. We just go along with whatever there's 'natural support' for at the time, and don't waste effort in trying to argue for change.
The issue is not about whether people should be able to opt out of a service once it's been decided that it's something worth paying for through taxation. It's whether free parking, on public land, for privately owned vehicles is something that should be provided as a 'service'. My view is that it should not be.
I think taxing cyclists would be an excellent idea, and a great way to claw in some much needed revenue. Nothing too excessive, maybe £10 a year for children under 16, and £50 for adults, with subsidies for students and anyone on benefits. This would at least help offset the cost of building cycle lanes a little, and would free up some cash to subsidise public transport.Increase parking charges = more money for public transport.
You're welcome.
How would you collect it? Much like cars you would need a central database of cycles with an initial entry whenever a new one is sold and the database updated when one is sold on. You would end up with a vast market for untaxed and unlicensed bicycles. We already have this problem with unlicensed/untaxed cars and cars are much easier to track than bikes owing to a) being far bigger and harder to hide and b) having a large machine readable number plate at each end. With bicycles someone would have to stop them and check them with a bar code reader or some such. Doing it on a sufficient scale would be prohibitive.I think taxing cyclists would be an excellent idea, and a great way to claw in some much needed revenue. Nothing too excessive, maybe £10 a year for children under 16, and £50 for adults, with subsidies for students and anyone on benefits. This would at least help offset the cost of building cycle lanes a little, and would free up some cash to subsidise public transport.
That's less than £1/week for a working adult. I'm sure nobody could argue against such a small fee, especially so when you consider it would be helping those less fortunate than them, such as people with disabilities, and others who have no choice but to rely on public transport.
I don't think Saul was being serious, TBH.
I think taxing cyclists would be an excellent idea, and a great way to claw in some much needed revenue. Nothing too excessive, maybe £10 a year for children under 16, and £50 for adults, with subsidies for students and anyone on benefits. This would at least help offset the cost of building cycle lanes a little, and would free up some cash to subsidise public transport.
That's less than £1/week for a working adult. I'm sure nobody could argue against such a small fee, especially so when you consider it would be helping those less fortunate than them, such as people with disabilities, and others who have no choice but to rely on public transport.
Ah yes, but the money from the bone-crushingly high parking charges goes into subisdising public transport, vital for carless locals particularly in remote places where commercial bus services may not be profitable.
What a strange suggestion. Should we also pay people who murder the elderly, because it will save on hospital bills?We should pay cyclists for their sterling work in reducing healthcare costs.
We should pay cyclists for their sterling work in reducing healthcare costs.
Every one who gets themselves squished costs the rest of us around a million quid. They should be insured for getting killed.
A train, when they jump the red lights at a level crossing, or a bus, when they ride down the inside of it.Squished by...?
Why would anyone ride a bike down the inside of a bus wouldn't be easier to just sit in a seat like the other passengers ?A train, when they jump the red lights at a level crossing, or a bus, when they ride down the inside of it.
Shall we use council tax revenue to pay for free of charge yacht berths? Yacht owners could probably get by without yachts but it would be less convenient for them to have nice weekends out, so let's subsidise it and non yacht-owners shouldn't complain.
Bike riders do it all the time. Most of them have zero road sense.Why would anyone ride a bike down the inside of a bus wouldn't be easier to just sit in a seat like the other passengers ?
Read his post againBike riders do it all the time. Most of them have zero road sense.
We should pay cyclists for their sterling work in reducing healthcare costs.
Fortunately someone at Westminster councul has seen sense and they've removed some from around here. That exercise in moronicity which made one of the two lanes a cycle lane along Cumberland Gate has now been ripped out and restored to a 2 lane road.Oh, we have. Round these parts we have paid tens of millions for bike lanes to be put in, not that they get used that much or correctly
I know this is an ancient post, but I live inGerrards Cross (been looking for a way to escape for 5 decades) and the in,y people who use the buses here are OAPs with passes (school buses notwithstanding. As an aside, can we go back to non-American school buses…?). There virtually aren’t any anymore; the 305 and 335 go to Slough about once a flood, and the X1 goes to Heathrow terminals 3 and 4 (i’ve no idea about terminals 1, 2 and 5). It’s moot as you’ll miss your flight if you rely on it. Then there’s the A40 bus which goes to Wycombe.^ this.
Pathetic how whinging car owners try and pull the 'what about the poor people' card when they are actively making poorer people's travel choices worse by choosing to drive, not to mention the damage they do to the countryside they are heading off to enjoy.
There used to be such a thing as Motability before the Tories decided you had to be practically dead to qualify. Might as well not exist now.See, all you stop bleating twats. Ever heard of the plastic bag charge? 5 tiny pennies has massively cut their use. So now the same has happened with Surrey's rural car parks, use of the countryside has fallen, Surrey Wildlife Trust's income has taken a large hit, fly tippers are moving in.
And scum like co-op who think that owning a car makes you so rich that they don't care about you, well, they can fuck right off, nasty, horrible wanker.
Councillors vote to scrap countryside parking charges
Dropped.
Mostly due to the fact that they are preventing the poorest in society from leading active and healthy lives. Something the tory brown-nosers on this thread don't feel is real or relevant.
The charging to 15 of 30 car parks was introduced in the summer of 2018 to generate money for the Countryside Estates. The decision sparked a huge backlash from the public with petitions and questions raised at meetings.
Although figures show an overall net income of £61,000, it cost around £300,000 to install the machines and set the scheme up.
So, that's about 1/4 million down the plughole, before you add in the cost of removing the machines.