Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Andy Coulson, the Met Police and Murdoch

.

But it is funny to watch the tabloids trying to be outraged at the "lack of investigation" and hinting the this is because the police are "corrupt" when, in fact, the last thing they actually want is a proper investigation ...

Are they acting outraged anyway though? The impression I get is that the tabs are as far as they possibly can, ignoring this story.
 
That would appear to be a circular argument.
This is now the third thread on which you have attempted to precipitate a derailing. You know perfectly well that I have no intention of directly engaging with you, so please stop quoting my posts and directing questions or comments specifically to me.

Trolling reported.
 
Are they acting outraged anyway though?
I've seen mention of it in an "outraged" way about the police and they'd love to let loose on Coulson ... but you're right - they're not giving it anywhere near as much coverage as it merits, and they certainly aren't focusing on their own criminal and immoral behaviour.
 
This is now the third thread on which you have attempted to precipitate a derailing. You know perfectly well that I have no intention of directly engaging with you, so please stop quoting my posts and directing questions or comments specifically to me.

Trolling reported.

Just ignore her if you've no intention of answering. It's clearly not trolling, so stop wasting the mods' time by reporting points of view that you don't agree with ffs.
 
This is now the third thread on which you have attempted to precipitate a derailing. You know perfectly well that I have no intention of directly engaging with you, so please stop quoting my posts and directing questions or comments specifically to me.

Trolling reported.

You're kidding! :D:D:D

Dear Mods

Please ask him for proof before you ban me as well as him.

Thanks.

ymu
 
as part of that inquiry officers will speak to the former editor and also have Mr Miskiw and Ross Hall, a junior reporter at the paper, on their radar. None of them has been interviewed before.

Mr Miskiw's involvement with Mr Mulcaire was highlighted by the Culture and Media Select Committee last year when his signature was found to be on a contract agreeing to pay the private investigator £7,000 in relation to a story about the PFA chief executive Gordon Taylor.
Mr Miskiw failed to provide testimony to the select committee. He told The Independent that he had contacted MPs to "explain his position". A search of the Commons library reveals a doctor's note saying he was unwell and could not testify.
Old evidence turns up again.

The interesting thing is that this all blew up because the press had become so cock sure of itself that they were publishing minor stories about the royal family that could only have come from voice intercepts or a very very deeply placed source. Violation of the law had become so routine and so beyond the interest of the authorities to persue that they were simply sloppy and greedy.

It had become so pervasive that the police now look corrupt to a wide number of people as they tried not to upset the apple cart. This was not a nod and a wink to the occasional short cut in investigating but almost a private intelligence service tacitly beyond the law. No matter people try to frame it this situation needs sorting.
 
It's clearly not trolling...

Forum rules said:
Repeated efforts to derail the debate could result in forum access termination.
This obsessed poster is stalking me from thread to thread, posting either ACAB rubbish, having a personal go at me and the accuracy of what I post and / or misrepresenting what I have posted. If that is not "repeated efforts to derail the debate" then I do not know what is.
 
This obsessed poster is stalking me from thread to thread, posting either ACAB rubbish, having a personal go at me and the accuracy of what I post and / or misrepresenting what I have posted. If that is not "repeated efforts to derail the debate" then I do not know what is.

No, she is not.
 
This seems to be db's new tactic - he accused me and Butchers iirc of pretty much the same yesterday.

He should realise that folks have a right to disagree with and challenge his assertions on a bulletin board. The remarkable thing is that he beleives that these people are trying to 'goad' him, as if anyone arguing against his often dubious points must be wrong and he couldn't possibly be expected to restrain himself or argue constructively.

It's a hypocritical load of nonsense sadly, a wearying delusional appeal for special treatment. He'd be better advised not to post such circular nonsense in the first place, or to have the determination to argue his points clearly and constructively afterwards.
 
Please stop attempting to derail this thread (and then no doubt me for doing so).


You started the derail at #94. And, incidentally, you've made yourself look exceedingly unreasonable and silly by using that particular post of ymu's to report - because fridgie agreed with her a couple of posts further back.
 
You started the derail at #94.
Just for the record, for the benefit of all the normal readers of this thread and for the mods, this is Post #94:

This is now the third thread on which you have attempted to precipitate a derailing. You know perfectly well that I have no intention of directly engaging with you, so please stop quoting my posts and directing questions or comments specifically to me.

Trolling reported.
So I, er started the derail by, er, politely asking people to stop attempting to derail the thread. Proof indeed of the trolling of these idiots and, as I predicted, then lying so as to blame me for doing so, something that they have succeeded with time and time again in the past.

Pathetic. :(
 
Just for the record, for the benefit of all the normal readers of this thread and for the mods, this is Post #94:


Proof indeed of the trolling of these idiots and, as I predicted, then lying so as to blame me for doing so, something that they have succeeded with time and time again in the past.

Pathetic. :(

All normal readers of this thread will probably be wondering why you reported ymu's post to the mods - after a mod agreed with her :D You are entirely the architect of your own grievances.
 
Andy Coulson is a cunt.

He most certainly is but who is the bigger cunt Coulson or Piers Moron?

On the one hand Coulson was clearly complicit in an illegal phone hacking mess which saw one of his underlings end up in court, on the other Moron was clearly complicit in a share fixing scandel which saw a couple of his underlings end up in court.

Moron got away with it, don't be surprised if Coulson slips the noose, again.

Anyway, who's the bigger cunt?
 
He most certainly is but who is the bigger cunt Coulson or Piers Moron?

On the one hand Coulson was clearly complicit in an illegal phone hacking mess which saw one of his underlings end up in court, on the other Moron was clearly complicit in a share fixing scandel which saw a couple of his underlings end up in court.

Moron got away with it, don't be surprised if Coulson slips the noose, again.

Anyway, who's the bigger cunt?

Nick Clegg?
 
Oh well, looks like all the normal people have just lost another interesting thread, wrecked by The Collective. :(
I invite all interested parties to click on my user name > posts made by user and identify all those posts I made in the wee small hours last night to ascertain whether d-b has any factual basis for his claims.
 
Funny thing is - the security codes to access a great many phones are still the same now as they were 10 years ago.

The default codes are unchanged. So this could still be happening now.
 
Hi. Can I just remind some users of the "ignore poster" feature?

No. If he's going to make unfounded accusations, I am going to respond to them. This is ridiculous. He deluges the mods with reported posts made with no basis whatsoever, and yet again a mod comes on to make a general warning to all concerned. I want him to provide evidence that I am trolling him, an accusation he's made on multiple threads where I have simply disagreed with him. He's deluded. He's been pulling this crap for months, against multiple posters, and you're still giving him the benefit of the doubt.


Happy to take this to a separate thread to avoid derailing this one, but this ain't right.
 
I invite all interested parties to click on my user name > posts made by user and identify all those posts I made in the wee small hours last night to ascertain whether d-b has any factual basis for his claims.

.
 
Back
Top Bottom