Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

And next, Syria?

There's no point wasting time debating tools, I guess when it doesn't matter any more the historians might get to what really went down. For now, the propaganda flies thick and Britain’s keyboard army push the squares in accordance with the desired outcome. Enjoy your soup.

Waiter, waiter, theres a fly in my soup. Thats you that is, zzzzzzzzz.
 
And for fucks sake, stop confusing whatever weird glow you get from being a grubby contrarian with actually finding articles that are illuminating and interesting. It's not interesting, its tired, predictable horseshit.
 
And for fucks sake, stop confusing whatever weird glow you get from being a grubby contrarian with actually finding articles that are illuminating and interesting. It's not interesting, its tired, predictable horseshit.

Article doesn't agree with the narrative to which you have become emotionally invested? Enemy-internet obviously, ignore. No harm in it mind, lives are at stake but I doubt you and your chums parroting really does much additional harm to Syrians on the ground. The circle-jerk called the Western media narrative would manufacture the necessary consent with its usual efficiency regardless of what you think is happening. I just think it's a shame that you're not even able to engage with positions with which you disagree. Just declare enemy articles enemy linked to the enemy internet by people with enemy opinions or enemy narratives haram and look away. I think this attitude flies in the face of intelligence. Anyway didn't mean to interrupt, as you were.
 
I'm not parroting anything and I know from the past that you don't actually have a coherent position for me to disagree with, you are all over the place you sloppy fucker.

Also I'm a fan of the potential of the internet and how it relates to the struggles of people. Not the way you use it though, fucking useless.
 
I'm not parroting anything and I know from the past that you don't actually have a coherent position for me to disagree with, you are all over the place you sloppy fucker.

Also I'm a fan of the potential of the internet and how it relates to the struggles of people. Not the way you use it though, fucking useless.

Yup, sloppy and all over the place. Welcome to life on planet Earth, it's confusing isn't it. Please continue discussing the latest plot in your nice pat Washington-DC Comic book.
 
I dont do comic book or black and white stinking up the place thanks. No 'enemy of my enemy is my friend' shit from me either so good luck actually pinning some love for Washington's agenda on me fuckstain. Casually Red might try from time to time because I relished the fall of the Gaddafi regime but if anyone was actually mad enough to try to re-read this thread, the Libya thread, the Bahrain thread or the Egypt thread you'd find me droning on about the complex realities without fear of labelling ANY sides stuff as bullshit or propaganda at key moments.
 
Yeah. I'm not wound up, just getting my stuff in briefly and then leaving him to it, since nothing is going to change and if these crap strongmen stances are the only stances being raised for us to argue with then no wonder this world events forum isn't what it used to be.
 
Hindsight is a generous provider of absolution of the guilt from falling for the sophisticated western government or state propaganda and their media sleights of hand that so often deceive us into believing the narrative they present, one that’s so often designed to justify military intervention.

Good articles from last year here:
Syria's White Helmets: War by Way of Deception - Part I
Part II - Syria's White Helmets: War By Way of Deception ~ 'Moderate Executioners'

From the second article above, one for the road...

Much of the propaganda surrounding Syria and the “conflict” is indeed, mythology spun-up by western agents of influence. A mythology created and disseminated by the NGO complex working diligently on the ground in Syria and remotely in the labyrinths of power, ensures that a steady flow of misinformation continues uninterrupted, one that is custom designed to alter public perception about the situation in Syria and drive us towards supporting the identical mistakes made in Iraq and Libya.

It is no error or oversight that the media barely mention Libya these days as it is plunged deeper and deeper into anarchy, where warlords occupy the terror vacuum created by the NATO’s deceptive intervention in 2011. Perhaps if people were confronted by images of the daily horrors endured by the people of Libya these day, they would be more reticent about the passive-aggressive re-creation of that same scenario in Syria.
 
Thanks be that you can see through the murk.

The White Helmets were established in March 2013, in Istanbul, Turkey, and is headed by James Le Mesurier, a British “security” specialist and ‘ex’ British military intelligence officer with an impressive track record in some of the most dubious NATO intervention theatres including Bosnia and Kosovo, as well as Iraq, Lebanon, and Palestine. Le Mesurier is a product of Britain’s elite Royal Military Academy at Sandhurst, and has also been placed in a series of high-profile pasts at the United Nations, European Union, and U.K. Foreign and Commonwealth Office.

it's not always quantum mathematics to be honest.
 
Nothing is real. None one dies, no one starves, no one drowns. No one freezes.

To suggest that they do=onions.
What I mean here is that there's been plenty of reports of the targeting of civilians and related infrastructure by all sides recently. No-one seems to have come out of it untarnished. One has only to look at one or two of the links that I've recently posted. One Twitter anti-regime activist tweeted the other day concerning the rebel shelling of a hospital as 'shameful' so you would think that if you were wanting to push a certain agenda say a pro-regime one that there'd be plenty of real-world events for your canvas. Instead of which we are offered up links from dodgy sites and ting. Just wtf. :facepalm:
 
What I mean here is that there's been plenty of reports of the targeting of civilians and related infrastructure by all sides recently. No-one seems to have come out of it untarnished. One has only to look at one or two of the links that I've recently posted. One Twitter anti-regime activist tweeted the other day concerning the rebel shelling of a hospital as 'shameful' so you would think that if you were wanting to push a certain agenda say a pro-regime one that there'd be plenty of real-world events for your canvas. Instead of which we are offered up links from dodgy sites and ting. Just wtf. :facepalm:

Perhaps I'm not pushing an agenda? Try reading the two articles I linked above to dodgy website 21stcenturywire.com, maybe it'll add some insight for you. Bet you daren't.
 
it's not always quantum mathematics to be honest.

The problem with your cite is that RMA Sandhurst is anything but elite, and any soldier knows this. It's the "bog-standard comprehensive" of the military colleges, where every junior officer gets sent, regardless of whether they have the smarts of Field Marshall Montgomery, or those of Lieutenant Duncan Smith.
 
Yeah. I'm not wound up, just getting my stuff in briefly and then leaving him to it, since nothing is going to change and if these crap strongmen stances are the only stances being raised for us to argue with then no wonder this world events forum isn't what it used to be.

You're taking a huff because someone actually disagreed with you . A forum going downhill because the narrative you put forward is being challenged for what it is ?. The usual western liberal regime change ballsology . Just as it was during the destruction of Libya, and elsewhere . The vast bulk of this uprising is either jihadist or blatantly sectarian in nature . Supported by the absolute scum of the earth, from Saudi and Qatari slave traders to scum like Clinton, Cameron, McCain, NATO , CIA etc That's been proven many times over . Stating the sheer obviousness of that isn't " a crap strongman stance " . It's calling out bullshit . Bullshit you whine about being challenged on .
 
lol. I don't mind people talking shit about me at all, I reserve the right to respond. I still think the forum has gone way downhill though, simply because there are less people contributing. That doesn't mean I'm feeling all lonely with less people to agree with me, I am moaning about a lack of diversity in terms of views disagreeing with me.

What, for example, is the point in me and you arguing with each other more these days? Our positions and disagreements were pretty clear some years ago and I'm not going to waste my time covering exactly the same ground anymore.
 
I stopped arguing with you months back, for largely the same reasons.

The lack of contributors might have something to do with the self appointed board police ganging up on posters and driving them off the forum when they disagree with them . As has happened a few times . Indeed Strassergate was a good example of that type of behaviour recently .
 
Prisoners took control of Hama prison earlier in the week. Looks like the regime are gearing up to take it back, so expect a massacre.

Negotiated end to uprising, apparently - dunno how far the regime can be trusted to honour its side.

After negotiation between the inmates and the regime through the mediation of a tribal chied sent by the regime “Sheikh Nawaf Al Mulhim” who also negotiated the end of Homs prison inmates’s desobedience.

The deal is as follows :

  • All 800 inmates will be liberated within the 4 months Iin several consecutive groups
  • The regime will run again the jail.
  • Those who have been sentenced to death will be amnistiated.
  • No security forces at the political inmates wing gate.
  • Only the jail police can enter with the regard to the shabbiha and Mukhabarat who attemtped several time to storm the prison.
  • SAA and regime security forces circling the jail will pull out.
  • Supply the prison with Food and water
  • No punishment against the inmates because of the desobedience campaign.
It is noteworthy that the inmates carried out their desobedience campaign collectively and with non violent means.


source - #Syria – Hama central prison – latest news
 
Fascinating piece on the contrasting approach of anarchists/radicals - specifically those with a narrow focus on Rojava that undermines the wider revolution and those looking far beyond just Rojava. Been hammering at this for ages, and the publication of 2 books (Burning Country: Stories of Syrians in Revolution and War + Khiyana: Daesh, the Left and the Unmaking of the Syrian Revolution) seems to have finally provoked some much needed reflection.

The Most Important Thing: Two speaking tours and the Syrian Revolution

These two tours both offered anarchist perspectives on Syria and yet their narratives were surprisingly different – on our walk to the bus station, we dug into those differences and tried to understand them. In spite of their scale and commitment, the anarchic practices carried out by the Syrian revolution (not in Rojava) have been largely ignored by anarchists in the west, while Rojava has been widely, and often uncritically, celebrated. In light of rapidly changing events on the ground, as grassroots groups risk being decisively overshadowed by the maneuvers of states, it’s important to look more carefully at Rojava and the Syrian revolution to see where our solidarity should lie. This will help us support revolutionaries there in the years to come and also make sure that, in the present, anarchist support isn’t fuelling forces that divide and undermine revolutionary energy.

...

One reason for the lack of international support for the Syrian revolution might be that it has largely been made invisible. The stories of Razan and Omar underline an important reason for this invisibility – many of the anarchists and most passionate activists were killed (usually by the regime )early on or were forced to flee the country. Rojava, on the other hand, had a different experience of the regime’s violence, which contributed to increased visibility.

In his talk, Paul shared many personal stories of his travels through the liberated territories of Rojava, mostly in the Kobane area. These stories are compelling and inspiring, they demonstrate a clear commitment to building international understanding between anti-authoritarian rebels and deepening practices of solidarity. However, when it came to the broader context of struggle in the Syrian territory, he seemed not to understand that there could possibly be revolutionaries outside of Rojava. I don’t raise this to criticise him personally – I think his work in building international solidarity with Rojava is very valuable. However, he is far from alone in this attitude and I want to understand how someone so evidently committed to engaging with revolutionary currents in Syria could ignore the struggles being waged in the rest of the country.

When several people in the audience questionned the recent attacks by the SDF against territory controlled by other rebel groups north of Aleppo, Paul largely repeated the propaganda of the SDF, the Assad regime, and the Russian military (all of whom collaborated in these attacks): everyone there is al-Qaeda or ISIS, there is no one worth listening to. Paul insisted that these attacks were necessary to link the Efrin Canton to Kobane Canton (two provinces of Rojava) and assumed that only Assad supporters would have a problem with this.

Lots more at the link.
 
Last edited:
Fascinating piece on the contrasting approach of anarchists/radicals - specifically those with a narrow focus on Rojava that undermines the wider revolution and those looking far beyond just Rojava. Been hammering at this for ages, and the publication of 2 books (Burning Country: Stories of Syrians in Revolution and War + Khiyana: Daesh, the Left and the Unmaking of the Syrian Revolution) seems to have finally provoked some much needed reflection.

The Most Important Thing: Two speaking tours and the Syrian Revolution

These two tours both offered anarchist perspectives on Syria and yet their narratives were surprisingly different – on our walk to the bus station, we dug into those differences and tried to understand them. In spite of their scale and commitment, the anarchic practices carried out by the Syrian revolution (not in Rojava) have been largely ignored by anarchists in the west, while Rojava has been widely, and often uncritically, celebrated. In light of rapidly changing events on the ground, as grassroots groups risk being decisively overshadowed by the maneuvers of states, it’s important to look more carefully at Rojava and the Syrian revolution to see where our solidarity should lie. This will help us support revolutionaries there in the years to come and also make sure that, in the present, anarchist support isn’t fuelling forces that divide and undermine revolutionary energy.

...

One reason for the lack of international support for the Syrian revolution might be that it has largely been made invisible. The stories of Razan and Omar underline an important reason for this invisibility – many of the anarchists and most passionate activists were killed (usually by the regime )early on or were forced to flee the country. Rojava, on the other hand, had a different experience of the regime’s violence, which contributed to increased visibility.

In his talk, Paul shared many personal stories of his travels through the liberated territories of Rojava, mostly in the Kobane area. These stories are compelling and inspiring, they demonstrate a clear commitment to building international understanding between anti-authoritarian rebels and deepening practices of solidarity. However, when it came to the broader context of struggle in the Syrian territory, he seemed not to understand that there could possibly be revolutionaries outside of Rojava. I don’t raise this to criticise him personally – I think his work in building international solidarity with Rojava is very valuable. However, he is far from alone in this attitude and I want to understand how someone so evidently committed to engaging with revolutionary currents in Syria could ignore the struggles being waged in the rest of the country.

When several people in the audience questionned the recent attacks by the SDF against territory controlled by other rebel groups north of Aleppo, Paul largely repeated the propaganda of the SDF, the Assad regime, and the Russian military (all of whom collaborated in these attacks): everyone there is al-Qaeda or ISIS, there is no one worth listening to. Paul insisted that these attacks were necessary to link the Efrin Canton to Kobane Canton (two provinces of Rojava) and assumed that only Assad supporters would have a problem with this.

Lots more at the link.

Don't suppose anyone has those books in eformat?
 
Back
Top Bottom