Larry Eliot is one of the most pro Leave voices in the media from day one, he is very partisan. As an economist he seems to do an amazing job of totally ignoring data like thisBrexit not the disaster the Remainers predicted, according to one Guardian journalist.
Anyone implying that the UK economy has outperformed those of supra-state members because of their "adherence to neoliberal economic ideas" is clearly spouting from his southern mouth.Larry Eliot is one of the most pro Leave voices in the media from day one, he is very partisan. As an economist he seems to do an amazing job of totally ignoring data like this
whether anyone sypmathises with the rationale and logic of that is another questionBrexit is Costing the UK £100 Billion a Year in Lost Output
Brexit is costing the UK economy £100 billion a year ($124 billion), with the effects spanning everything from business investment to the ability of companies to hire workers.www.bloomberg.com
UK govenrment borrowing is at record highs, IIRC serving the debt remains eye watering, and british infrastructure is collapsing infront of our eyes
...all down to Brexit? No, but how anyone has anything positive to say about the state of Britain is beyond meUK government borrowing near record high for October
Second-highest figure for the month confirms pressure on public finances ahead of Autumn Statementwww.ft.com
also all the stuff about the growing dominance of the far right in European politics applies absolutely equally to Britain, and Brexit played its nativist part in that also. i really dont see what point he is making bringing the fascist creep into a case about post-BrexitAnyone implying that the UK economy has outperformed those of supra-state members because of their "adherence to neoliberal economic ideas" is clearly spouting from his southern mouth.
These statements don't seem exactly positive.Larry Eliot is one of the most pro Leave voices in the media from day one, he is very partisan. As an economist he seems to do an amazing job of totally ignoring data like this
whether anyone sypmathises with the rationale and logic of that is another questionBrexit is Costing the UK £100 Billion a Year in Lost Output
Brexit is costing the UK economy £100 billion a year ($124 billion), with the effects spanning everything from business investment to the ability of companies to hire workers.www.bloomberg.com
UK govenrment borrowing is at record highs, IIRC serving the debt remains eye watering, and british infrastructure is collapsing infront of our eyes
...all down to Brexit? No, but how anyone has anything positive to say about the state of Britain is beyond meUK government borrowing near record high for October
Second-highest figure for the month confirms pressure on public finances ahead of Autumn Statementwww.ft.com
well depends which prediction you match againstAnd anyway, the thrust of the article is that Brexit didn't go into meltdown after Brexit like many Remainers were confident it would, and that the EU heartlands have major problems of their own.
there remain border checks that haven't been implemented of course....i wonder how long that can will be kicked for.
It may (?) be true that the "EU heartlands have major problems of their own", but aside from being part of the Euro-zone, I can't see what credible factors that Eliot regards as unique to the supra-state members that don't afflict the UK economy. The whole premise of the article is a nonsense; it's redundant to compare the post-brexit performance of the UK against EU economies without attempting to analyse the impact on the UK economy of non membership.And anyway, the thrust of the article is that Brexit didn't go into meltdown after Brexit like many Remainers were confident it would, and that the EU heartlands have major problems of their own.
House prices ARE falling. That ain't Brexit (is in the mix tbf).Also it’s a bit ‘hooray, house prices didn’t become more affordable’. Aren’t we lucky.
erHouse prices ARE falling.
Oh yeah .and intrest rates do go down next year. THEN the markets crash crash.er
View attachment 403296House Price Statistics - UK House Price Index
landregistry.data.gov.uk
6 days ago news:
UK house prices beat forecasts to rise again in November
Nationwide reports third consecutive monthly increase as hopes grow of stabilisation in property marketwww.ft.com
According to the government’s estimates, just over 5 million employees are covered by the new rules, many in education, where workers are often employed on term-time contracts, and retail, where people often work shift patterns or zero hour contracts.
A government analysis published this week reveals that the change will be so wide-ranging that it will save employers between £50m and £248m every year.
Officials said, however, that estimates of the number of people who will lose out are uncertain as it is unclear how many employers were actually abiding by the rules set out by the supreme court. “It is very difficult to know exactly how many employers were following the previous case law, so the figures involved are speculative and likely a significant overestimate,” a spokesperson said.
Officials say they were able to issue the new rules, in part because Britain has left the EU and with it the strict labour laws covered by the working time directive.
Richard Arthur, head of trade union law at Thompsons Solicitors, said: “This move takes advantage of what the government is allowed to do post-Brexit. The government is taking that opportunity and bringing in new rules to the advantage of employers.”
tbcPart-time and shift workers to lose up to £248m holiday pay in UK rule change
Experts say alteration to holiday rights is one of the most significant erosions of employment protections since UK left EUwww.theguardian.com
Labour officials could not guarantee, however, that they would overturn the change if they won the next election.
79. In short, the amount of leave to which a part-year worker under a permanent
contract is entitled is not required by EU law to be, and under domestic law is not,
prorated to that of a full-time worker.
80. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal
Leave voters are not responsible for the antics of the DUP. Their refusal to accept being the minority party in the north is the reason for the intransigence.There you are any lexiters here, equivocate away, but your vote to leave is continuing to fuck things in Ireland.
Stormont: Protesters tell politicians to 'get back to work'
Health workers stage a noisy protest as parties arrive for crucial talks with the government.www.bbc.co.uk
We've had seven years in the merde
Leave voters are not responsible for the antics of the DUP. Their refusal to accept being the minority party in the north is the reason for the intransigence.
I do credit them for their ability to extract eye watering extra funds for the north as part of the negotiations though.