Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

A thank you to Brexiteers.

Brexit not the disaster the Remainers predicted, according to one Guardian journalist.


'Britain’s economic performance in the seven years since 2016 has been mediocre but not the full-on horror show that was prophesied by the remain camp during the weeks leading up to the referendum. The doomsday scenario – crashing house prices (falls of up to 18% could result, warned then chancellor George Osborne) and mass unemployment – never happened.'


'Over a prolonged period, not just since the arrival of Covid-19, the EU’s economic performance has been woeful.'


'A number of factors are to blame for the EU’s economic woes. The one-size-fits-all nature of the single currency is one; the lack of a federal budget to match in size that of the US is another; the adherence to neoliberal economic ideas– such as tough controls on the size of budget deficits – a third. The problems go right to the heart of the EU. Its biggest economy – Germany – is expected to contract this year and has been left with a €60bn black hole in the public finances after the country’s constitutional court ruled against the coalition government’s spending plans.

Despite its relative decline, the EU remains prosperous. It is certainly rich enough to act as a magnet for those in poorer parts of the world seeking a better life. So at the same time as its economy has struggled, the number of migrants has increased. One result has been the rise of aggressively rightwing politics. In Germany, Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) is currently second in the opinion polls with voter support running at about 22%. In France, Marine Le Pen could be the next president. Giorgia Meloni leads the most rightwing Italian government since the second world war, while in the Netherlands the anti-immigration Freedom party led by Geert Wilders won the most seats in last month’s election. Something has gone seriously awry when politics in four of the founding members of the European project have turned so ugly.

Nor are the traditionally liberal Scandinavian countries immune to this trend. Denmark – which once had one of the world’s most liberal migration regimes – has shifted from a policy of welcome and integration to one of detention and return. Sweden and Finland have both seen the emergence of ultranationalist rightwing parties.'


 
Last edited:
Brexit not the disaster the Remainers predicted, according to one Guardian journalist.
Larry Eliot is one of the most pro Leave voices in the media from day one, he is very partisan. As an economist he seems to do an amazing job of totally ignoring data like this
whether anyone sypmathises with the rationale and logic of that is another question

UK govenrment borrowing is at record highs, IIRC serving the debt remains eye watering, and british infrastructure is collapsing infront of our eyes
...all down to Brexit? No, but how anyone has anything positive to say about the state of Britain is beyond me
 
Yeh just imagine if Corbyn had got in though we'd have spent all that money nationalizing stuff :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Larry Eliot is one of the most pro Leave voices in the media from day one, he is very partisan. As an economist he seems to do an amazing job of totally ignoring data like this
whether anyone sypmathises with the rationale and logic of that is another question

UK govenrment borrowing is at record highs, IIRC serving the debt remains eye watering, and british infrastructure is collapsing infront of our eyes
...all down to Brexit? No, but how anyone has anything positive to say about the state of Britain is beyond me
Anyone implying that the UK economy has outperformed those of supra-state members because of their "adherence to neoliberal economic ideas" is clearly spouting from his southern mouth.
 
Anyone implying that the UK economy has outperformed those of supra-state members because of their "adherence to neoliberal economic ideas" is clearly spouting from his southern mouth.
also all the stuff about the growing dominance of the far right in European politics applies absolutely equally to Britain, and Brexit played its nativist part in that also. i really dont see what point he is making bringing the fascist creep into a case about post-Brexit
 
Larry Eliot is one of the most pro Leave voices in the media from day one, he is very partisan. As an economist he seems to do an amazing job of totally ignoring data like this
whether anyone sypmathises with the rationale and logic of that is another question

UK govenrment borrowing is at record highs, IIRC serving the debt remains eye watering, and british infrastructure is collapsing infront of our eyes
...all down to Brexit? No, but how anyone has anything positive to say about the state of Britain is beyond me
These statements don't seem exactly positive.


'Britain’s economic performance in the seven years since 2016 has been mediocre but not the full-on horror show that was prophesied by the remain camp during the weeks leading up to the referendum. The doomsday scenario – crashing house prices (falls of up to 18% could result, warned then chancellor George Osborne) and mass unemployment – never happened.'

'Brexit provided opportunities to do things differently but those opportunities have so far not been exploited.'


And anyway, the thrust of the article is that Brexit didn't go into meltdown after Brexit like many Remainers were confident it would, and that the EU heartlands have major problems of their own.
 
And anyway, the thrust of the article is that Brexit didn't go into meltdown after Brexit like many Remainers were confident it would, and that the EU heartlands have major problems of their own.
well depends which prediction you match against
i think it is broadly matching those predicted by the OBR - although OBR expected a lower migration figure, whereas the opposite has happened

there remain border checks that haven't been implemented of course....i wonder how long that can will be kicked for.
 
there remain border checks that haven't been implemented of course....i wonder how long that can will be kicked for.

My guess is for the remainder of this dying Tory government following the gradual withering away of the need for border checks as Shur Kieth's administration moves towards a stealthy re-joining of the single market over time.

Dreadful pile-up queues at Dover in peak holiday season and at Christmas has reduced even the most salivating Brexiteer appetite for full border checks I think.
 
And anyway, the thrust of the article is that Brexit didn't go into meltdown after Brexit like many Remainers were confident it would, and that the EU heartlands have major problems of their own.
It may (?) be true that the "EU heartlands have major problems of their own", but aside from being part of the Euro-zone, I can't see what credible factors that Eliot regards as unique to the supra-state members that don't afflict the UK economy. The whole premise of the article is a nonsense; it's redundant to compare the post-brexit performance of the UK against EU economies without attempting to analyse the impact on the UK economy of non membership.
 
Also it’s a bit ‘hooray, house prices didn’t become more affordable’. Aren’t we lucky.
House prices ARE falling. That ain't Brexit (is in the mix tbf).

Eurozone headaches, next year, down well to get some distance.. UK dependence on the financial sector our own nightmare.
 

According to the government’s estimates, just over 5 million employees are covered by the new rules, many in education, where workers are often employed on term-time contracts, and retail, where people often work shift patterns or zero hour contracts.

A government analysis published this week reveals that the change will be so wide-ranging that it will save employers between £50m and £248m every year.

Officials said, however, that estimates of the number of people who will lose out are uncertain as it is unclear how many employers were actually abiding by the rules set out by the supreme court. “It is very difficult to know exactly how many employers were following the previous case law, so the figures involved are speculative and likely a significant overestimate,” a spokesperson said.

Officials say they were able to issue the new rules, in part because Britain has left the EU and with it the strict labour laws covered by the working time directive.

Richard Arthur, head of trade union law at Thompsons Solicitors, said: “This move takes advantage of what the government is allowed to do post-Brexit. The government is taking that opportunity and bringing in new rules to the advantage of employers.”
 
It looks to me a bit like the way this is being reported is nonsense. The actual judgement is here:


Is it not the case that the changes have been justified with reference to EU law? Because the law as it stands is essentially retained EU legislation.

Look at paragraphs 78 and 79.

79. In short, the amount of leave to which a part-year worker under a permanent
contract is entitled is not required by EU law to be, and under domestic law is not,
prorated to that of a full-time worker.
80. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal

Doesn't that mean that the exact same conclusion would have been reached if we were still in the EU.

Additionally, paragraph 2 suggests that the UK allowance is actually more generous that what the EU WTD requires, and this has not changed.
 
There you are any lexiters here, equivocate away, but your vote to leave is continuing to fuck things in Ireland.


Leave voters are not responsible for the antics of the DUP. Their refusal to accept being the minority party in the north is the reason for the intransigence.

I do credit them for their ability to extract eye watering extra funds for the north as part of the negotiations though.
 
Leave voters are not responsible for the antics of the DUP. Their refusal to accept being the minority party in the north is the reason for the intransigence.

I do credit them for their ability to extract eye watering extra funds for the north as part of the negotiations though.

Leave voters created two different systems either side of a land border on the island of Ireland with no suggestion as to how that is supposed to be managed.
The subsequent mess is exploited by the DUP.
Yes they don’t want to be the minority party in ‘power sharing’, but they also want Northern Ireland to be treated no differently than Wales, Scotland, Kent or Cornwall within the UK.
Different treatment would not be happening if the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland was treated all the same as implied in the vote and written in black and white on the ballot paper.
It might be convenient for leave voters to blame the mess they have caused on the DUP, but it wouldn’t be true.
Any leave voters want to say in exact detail how to deal with the land border?
 
All new Portuguese ID cards and national state ID cards across the EU ( which are also used as passports within the EU) are biometric now . I got mine done last year photo , fingerprints and signature . Book on line provide scan of documents and then pitch up for the photo and electronic finger prints .
 
UK passport have been biometric for about a decade ..

this is about the ESS which will mean everyone a UK passport hold enter the EU they need to be figure printed and possible get authorisation/ visa

most like a small entry charge


but it a clear benefit for the UK
 
Back
Top Bottom