Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

5G networks - safety, conspiracies and moron cell tower attacks

The rise of the idiots continues


With Facebook fuelling the stupidity:

Even on Friday, complaints to Facebook moderators about a group that appeared to encourage arson attacks on 5G masts received replies saying the page did "not violate our community standards" - although after the BBC contacted Facebook's press office it was taken down.
 
This keeps coming up as 'proof' that 5G is unsafe (and recently, always as evidence of its rile in the virus spreading)


But it's worth noting that the same publication ran this

 

These anti-5G cunts are annoying fuckwits at the best of times, but I think this crosses the line into something else. They're not just wasting their own money and poisoning their own bodies with their pseudomedical quackshit, they're actually committing sabotage at this point. All because they can't be fucking bothered to pick up a physics textbook and learn the difference between ionising and non-ionising radiation. Complete pieces of shit who deserve to get the book thrown at them when they get caught.
 

These anti-5G cunts are annoying fuckwits at the best of times, but I think this crosses the line into something else. They're not just wasting their own money and poisoning their own bodies with their pseudomedical quackshit, they're actually committing sabotage at this point. All because they can't be fucking bothered to pick up a physics textbook and learn the difference between ionising and non-ionising radiation. Complete pieces of shit who deserve to get the book thrown at them when they get caught.

I blame David Icke - he’s chief promoter of this 5G/coronavirus tinfoilery.

He recently did an live interview with London Real which was watched by a worldwide audience of 8 million!
 
All because they can't be fucking bothered to pick up a physics textbook and learn the difference between ionising and non-ionising radiation.

<strokes beard at suggestion of simplistic distinction between the two...>
 
<strokes beard at suggestion of simplistic distinction between the two...>
It's a spectrum, for sure. But the wavelengths used in telecommunications are at the opposite end of the spectrum to the nasty ionising shit.
 
While any connection to the virus is obvious bollocks and fuck the burner downers, I'm not really sure building 5G towers is actually vital at the moment.
 
Fair point. Much closer in range to those crowd control weapons. :hmm:

So things like the power output of the source (which is gonna be considerable for a crowd-control weapon, unlike a small device of 1-5 watts like a mobile), and the distance between source and object don't matter at all? Even ELF waves will cook a person if one stands sufficiently close to a sufficiently powerful source, but each individual photon does not have the energy to damage DNA, which is how ionising radiation causes cancer. Absent that, thermal energy transfer is the only known mechanism for EM radiation to cause damage, which is how that weapon works.

While any connection to the virus is obvious bollocks and fuck the burner downers, I'm not really sure building 5G towers is actually vital at the moment.

Do you really expect that the conspiracunts would have the technical know-how to tell the difference between a 5G and a non-5G tower? Fuck them all, they've long gone past the point where they can be granted any excuses.
 
So things like the power output of the source (which is gonna be considerable for a crowd-control weapon, unlike a small device of 1-5 watts like a mobile), and the distance between source and object don't matter at all...
<snip>

I really need a better way of signposting when I'm not being serious. :D
 
ah right, I guess 2g is staying for smart meters and alarm systems and the like

There are quite a few random bits and pieces like medical systems that use 3G to support systems that will be around well after 2023 - wonder what will happen with those...

edit: I guess some niche carrier, or maybe just one of the main ones, will pick that up?
 
There are quite a few random bits and pieces like medical systems that use 3G to support systems that will be around well after 2023 - wonder what will happen with those...

edit: I guess some niche carrier, or maybe just one of the main ones, will pick that up?


Thing is a niche carrier will have to be responsible for an entire 3G network and equipment with little income for it so I guess if they switch 3g off they will have to shunt the systems back to 2g or up to 5g
 
Thing is a niche carrier will have to be responsible for an entire 3G network and equipment with little income for it so I guess if they switch 3g off they will have to shunt the systems back to 2g or up to 5g

I think there will be a lot of devices out there that are 3G only.
 
Back
Top Bottom